An apple randomly falling due to the stem snapping shouldn't have any force in the x axis, only y due to (g) acceleration at 9.81 m/s^2. (the cause of this can be debated elsewhere, but it does reliably occur.)
No offense, but this is incorrect. If you believe the earth is rotating, then everything on the earth is rotating with it, including the trees, and thus the apples on the tree. The apples still have an “X component” (aka horizontal motion).
Imagine you dropped an apple in a moving train.... does it fall straight down to your feet, or does it fall “behind” you as the train drives forward?
No need to refer to an apple falling from a tree because globers will tell you the apple and tree are spinning with the earth and so when it drops it is already moving with the spin of the earth
What you could point out are helicopters, airplanes, hot air balloons, birds and insects
These things remain airborne, change their directions, and have no issue combating the supposed 1600 km/h spin (near the equator)
Retards will tell you the earth is pulling all of those things including our atmosphere along in perfect harmony, ignoring the fact that the earth would only be spinning in the same direction always. Think about how that would relate to these airborne objects going any direction they choose
Momentum and inertia don’t explain this
I’m a helicopter. I fly somewhere, anywhere, doesn’t matter. Before I land, I hover for a bit
I’m a helicopter. I fly somewhere, anywhere, doesn’t matter. Before I land, I hover for a bit
Why isn’t the earth spinning below me?
By the time you take off you are already moving in the direction of the spin you fucking retard.
By your logic, if you are driving on a train that goes 200km/h and let something fall out of your hand, that object should shoot away at 200km/h in the direction opposite of the direction of the train.
Choice implies being subjected to objectifying balance...choice exists at the center of balance; balance (momentum) exists at the center of motion.
This is how life can have free will of choice over movement (up/down; left/right; forward/back); while being moved from inception towards death aka one direction.
a) question direction (dying) causing reaction (living); then generator (dying) causing reactors (living)?
b) while being alive; one cannot perceive ones inception and death; because one exist in-between aka as reacting choice within enacting momentum.
Planar and motionless!
No offense, but this is incorrect. If you believe the earth is rotating, then everything on the earth is rotating with it, including the trees, and thus the apples on the tree. The apples still have an “X component” (aka horizontal motion).
Imagine you dropped an apple in a moving train.... does it fall straight down to your feet, or does it fall “behind” you as the train drives forward?
Exact same scenario here
No need to refer to an apple falling from a tree because globers will tell you the apple and tree are spinning with the earth and so when it drops it is already moving with the spin of the earth
What you could point out are helicopters, airplanes, hot air balloons, birds and insects
These things remain airborne, change their directions, and have no issue combating the supposed 1600 km/h spin (near the equator)
Retards will tell you the earth is pulling all of those things including our atmosphere along in perfect harmony, ignoring the fact that the earth would only be spinning in the same direction always. Think about how that would relate to these airborne objects going any direction they choose
Momentum and inertia don’t explain this
I’m a helicopter. I fly somewhere, anywhere, doesn’t matter. Before I land, I hover for a bit
Why isn’t the earth spinning below me?
No glober can answer this
Okay. The helicopter airplane idea expressed here is the first flat earth thought that has intrigued me. Very interesting.
And yes, you are right with the apple. That was my first response.
Holy cow. My mind is blown right now and I will have to think about this more.
By the time you take off you are already moving in the direction of the spin you fucking retard.
By your logic, if you are driving on a train that goes 200km/h and let something fall out of your hand, that object should shoot away at 200km/h in the direction opposite of the direction of the train.
How do you explain that it does not?
I didn’t specify which direction I’m travelling
You’re just retarded, handshake
Why? Explain.
Your train example is impressively retarded
Why? Explain.
Choice implies being subjected to objectifying balance...choice exists at the center of balance; balance (momentum) exists at the center of motion.
This is how life can have free will of choice over movement (up/down; left/right; forward/back); while being moved from inception towards death aka one direction.
a) question direction (dying) causing reaction (living); then generator (dying) causing reactors (living)?
b) while being alive; one cannot perceive ones inception and death; because one exist in-between aka as reacting choice within enacting momentum.