a) nature doesn't suggest information; it communicates perceivable inspiration.
b) those within nature who ignore perceivable inspiration (reality) can suggest information (fiction) to each other by choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law.
c) the foundation of "what" can only imply energy; while any suggested explanation build upon it represents a different comprehension of the same perceivable source enacting itself upon senses.
d) the foundation for all numbers (designation of a unit) represents being the perceiving ONE (unit; unitas; the state of being one; oneness) within the ONEness (energy) of the perceivable ALL. Energy designates itself internally from whole (oneness) into units (ones); which in return allows the whole (perceivable) to communicate with each unit (perceiving).
Others suggest numbers to tempt one to ignore being one within oneness. Two suggested identical things have to exist as each one in a different place for oneself to be able to perceive them.
e) what is more beneficial for oneself...reasoning about suggested information (by military.com) or adaptation to perceivable inspiration (in this case simple pattern recognition)?
f) what benefits do others get from choosing to want (upvote) vs not want (downvote) among themselves? Did what I wrote causes that conflict or their response to it? Could it be that the difference between suggested information (want) and perceivable inspiration (need) is depending on responding choice?
g) IN (being within) FORM (formed by) -ATION (through action). Notice that when you question suggested information; that you ignore that your questioning represents a "reaction", hence being within and formed by enacting aka form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
the mage
How much do you comprehend about MAGIC; noun (from root magh) - "to be able, have power" ? What enables you and what power do you represent?
What are you suggesting by posting this information?
Thats a bot
a) nature doesn't suggest information; it communicates perceivable inspiration.
b) those within nature who ignore perceivable inspiration (reality) can suggest information (fiction) to each other by choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law.
c) the foundation of "what" can only imply energy; while any suggested explanation build upon it represents a different comprehension of the same perceivable source enacting itself upon senses.
d) the foundation for all numbers (designation of a unit) represents being the perceiving ONE (unit; unitas; the state of being one; oneness) within the ONEness (energy) of the perceivable ALL. Energy designates itself internally from whole (oneness) into units (ones); which in return allows the whole (perceivable) to communicate with each unit (perceiving).
Others suggest numbers to tempt one to ignore being one within oneness. Two suggested identical things have to exist as each one in a different place for oneself to be able to perceive them.
e) what is more beneficial for oneself...reasoning about suggested information (by military.com) or adaptation to perceivable inspiration (in this case simple pattern recognition)?
f) what benefits do others get from choosing to want (upvote) vs not want (downvote) among themselves? Did what I wrote causes that conflict or their response to it? Could it be that the difference between suggested information (want) and perceivable inspiration (need) is depending on responding choice?
g) IN (being within) FORM (formed by) -ATION (through action). Notice that when you question suggested information; that you ignore that your questioning represents a "reaction", hence being within and formed by enacting aka form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
How much do you comprehend about MAGIC; noun (from root magh) - "to be able, have power" ? What enables you and what power do you represent?