There's a strange line I have yet to see any liberal cross, for all the line crossing they seem so enthusiastic about.
They defend their position with, "It's not murder because that's not a baby," and any discussion proceeds to whether or not it's a baby. But the other out is, "I don't care whether you think it's murder, and I don't care if you think I'm a murderer."
It's bizarre because, in essence, that's just a judgement and not subject to debate. I mean, if I see some dude smoking and eating a jelly donut, and walk up to him and say, "You're committing suicide!" he's not going to debate me as to the definition of suicide. He might even say, "Sure is, but what a way to go!"
So for all their hatred and disregard and derision of people with whom they disagree, I believe something very low level is at work. That is, if someone tells them they're a murderer, then their subconscious calculates it out and comes up with, "Well, maybe you are." And that's what even such degraded people can't accept.
Because you don't give a shit about the babies once they are born.
I hate that argument. It plays into the left-right paradigm and assumes that a person against abortion is also against spending to help children have what they need.
try to assure the person that I do, in fact, care and that I believe children should have what they need to thrive.
Then I would try to get that person to see that being aborted is not tantamount to being otherwise destined to grow up in poverty.
If the person persists by claiming that abortion occurs mostly among the poor, I would remind them that government policies that make survival subject to economic factors are fundamentally unfair. Even a poor family should be able to raise a child.
Socialists can justify anything by how they perceive its affect on society. You getting your vaccines benefits all of us. By the same measure, you aborting the child you can't afford to raise properly also benefits all of us (in their twisted worldview). Since their argument is really about perceived benefit to society and not reason, that's where you will find logical disconnects like the one highlighted in this video.
There's a strange line I have yet to see any liberal cross, for all the line crossing they seem so enthusiastic about.
They defend their position with, "It's not murder because that's not a baby," and any discussion proceeds to whether or not it's a baby. But the other out is, "I don't care whether you think it's murder, and I don't care if you think I'm a murderer."
It's bizarre because, in essence, that's just a judgement and not subject to debate. I mean, if I see some dude smoking and eating a jelly donut, and walk up to him and say, "You're committing suicide!" he's not going to debate me as to the definition of suicide. He might even say, "Sure is, but what a way to go!"
So for all their hatred and disregard and derision of people with whom they disagree, I believe something very low level is at work. That is, if someone tells them they're a murderer, then their subconscious calculates it out and comes up with, "Well, maybe you are." And that's what even such degraded people can't accept.
NPCS suffer divide by zero error
He can pull it off because he's a tall Chad. If a Normie went around filming asking that question they would get assaulted asap.
Good for him lol
Timestamp 2:51:
I hate that argument. It plays into the left-right paradigm and assumes that a person against abortion is also against spending to help children have what they need.
try to assure the person that I do, in fact, care and that I believe children should have what they need to thrive.
Then I would try to get that person to see that being aborted is not tantamount to being otherwise destined to grow up in poverty.
If the person persists by claiming that abortion occurs mostly among the poor, I would remind them that government policies that make survival subject to economic factors are fundamentally unfair. Even a poor family should be able to raise a child.
Socialists can justify anything by how they perceive its affect on society. You getting your vaccines benefits all of us. By the same measure, you aborting the child you can't afford to raise properly also benefits all of us (in their twisted worldview). Since their argument is really about perceived benefit to society and not reason, that's where you will find logical disconnects like the one highlighted in this video.