You're not accounting properly with chemtrails. Depopulation is a gigantic profit motive especially in countries that have infastrucure. Look how many Africans china has been killing because they want an Africa without Africans. And there's precedent behind it with agent orange, everyone knows that.
Cloud seeding is real. They really do it, that's undisputed. The question is how does weather modification fit into war.
I think the more compelling evidence is that pro geo engineering scientists openly say yes this is possibly hazardous to future generations, it is not very expensive and is something they want to do.
That's why I put emphasis on Global death. Using chemtrails for weather modification as you point out isn't even a conspiracy theory but a verified tactic that was employed in Vietnam. It's the idea that the Rich and Powerful are trying to murder the planet by poisoning the atmosphere where things become highly unlikely.
Most people who believe everything that the history books tell them, will argue that chemtrails are fake. There are no such thing as chemtrails, just contrails. Trails formed from condensation.
So explain to me what the point is arguing semantics about the who and the why, when the truth is, it is a conspiracy of global proportions and peons such as you and I are not privy to this information.
The most simplest explanation is likely the most plausible. They are doing it to combat global warming. But are you going to argue with the 1% of us who do understand that condensation trails evaporate, while a chemical trail will spread like ink in water, that its main or even secondary goal is not about killing us, when we have no way of knowing that?
Just seems like your stoking the division honestly.
And clot shots are "safe and effective" because Dr fauci lying to me is highly unlikely.
You have no fucking idea how likely anything is. You can't say that. You just have "feelings" like a woman or you have evidence. Pick one. Don't confuse the two.
Look at this german pussy I'm talking down to in another thread. It's literally illegal to question the narrative in his shithole country and he's telling ME, the person with sourced facts about everything, how "unlikely" it is that jews took their guns before they genocided Germany.
Hitler took the guns, you NSDAP blah blah blah
That's not true. Hitler RESTORED fun rights that the bolshevik child raping jews took away.
He won't look at evidence shoved right in front of his stupid face and neither will you so long as you're so emotionally invested in reaching a conclusion before even investigating
The "co-conspirator" dismissal is what many normies use to explain away even obvious conspiracies, such as the "Great Reset" we are currently living through.
The conspirators got the entire world on board with this agenda, yet not everyone is truly "in the know". Doesn't make a difference as things are compartmentalized and everyone is following orders making the plan happen (whether they fully grasp it or not).
Compartmentalization exists so that people can follow orders while being given information on a need-to-know basis. The Manhattan Project employed 130,000 people, only a handful of them knowing what was really being planned.
People can be highly incentivised and be selected based on their perceived loyalty. The NSA employs 32,000 people, but there are very few whistleblowers from that agency.
Who profits and/or who benefits?:
When there is a lack of transparency, it is not obvious what opportunities exist for people to unethically enrich themselves acquire political advantage.
can't keep the public in the dark with too many co-conspirators.
a) the few are the ones utilizing the "light-bringer" allegory upon the many.
b) what if darkness represents the ignorance (dark) of the many; who lack comprehension (light) of the perceivable (inspiration); caused by their consent to the suggested (information) by the few?
c) isn't it the few who utilize sleight of hands; notices of liability; reveals of method; alleviation of karmic retribution by disclosing everything in disguised form?
d) what if the co-conspirators of the suggesting few represents the consenting many who follow the suggested orders willingly; while ignoring to resist the natural order?
e) look at the recent corona narrative...what wasn't disclosed to the public? Didn't the few put "I can't breathe" leads to death right into everyone's face? How does one disclose anything to a public that ignores perceivable reality for suggested fiction?
You're not accounting properly with chemtrails. Depopulation is a gigantic profit motive especially in countries that have infastrucure. Look how many Africans china has been killing because they want an Africa without Africans. And there's precedent behind it with agent orange, everyone knows that.
Cloud seeding is real. They really do it, that's undisputed. The question is how does weather modification fit into war.
I think the more compelling evidence is that pro geo engineering scientists openly say yes this is possibly hazardous to future generations, it is not very expensive and is something they want to do.
That's why I put emphasis on Global death. Using chemtrails for weather modification as you point out isn't even a conspiracy theory but a verified tactic that was employed in Vietnam. It's the idea that the Rich and Powerful are trying to murder the planet by poisoning the atmosphere where things become highly unlikely.
Lol.
Most people who believe everything that the history books tell them, will argue that chemtrails are fake. There are no such thing as chemtrails, just contrails. Trails formed from condensation.
So explain to me what the point is arguing semantics about the who and the why, when the truth is, it is a conspiracy of global proportions and peons such as you and I are not privy to this information.
The most simplest explanation is likely the most plausible. They are doing it to combat global warming. But are you going to argue with the 1% of us who do understand that condensation trails evaporate, while a chemical trail will spread like ink in water, that its main or even secondary goal is not about killing us, when we have no way of knowing that?
Just seems like your stoking the division honestly.
And clot shots are "safe and effective" because Dr fauci lying to me is highly unlikely.
You have no fucking idea how likely anything is. You can't say that. You just have "feelings" like a woman or you have evidence. Pick one. Don't confuse the two.
Look at this german pussy I'm talking down to in another thread. It's literally illegal to question the narrative in his shithole country and he's telling ME, the person with sourced facts about everything, how "unlikely" it is that jews took their guns before they genocided Germany.
That's not true. Hitler RESTORED fun rights that the bolshevik child raping jews took away.
He won't look at evidence shoved right in front of his stupid face and neither will you so long as you're so emotionally invested in reaching a conclusion before even investigating
The "co-conspirator" dismissal is what many normies use to explain away even obvious conspiracies, such as the "Great Reset" we are currently living through.
The conspirators got the entire world on board with this agenda, yet not everyone is truly "in the know". Doesn't make a difference as things are compartmentalized and everyone is following orders making the plan happen (whether they fully grasp it or not).
Decided to share this with you guys to see if the win conspiracy community has any issue with my reasoning here.
TL;DR - This isn't meant to be a video about debunking conspiracies or promoting them, just how to take a more rational approach to them.
Number of co-conspirators:
Compartmentalization exists so that people can follow orders while being given information on a need-to-know basis. The Manhattan Project employed 130,000 people, only a handful of them knowing what was really being planned.
People can be highly incentivised and be selected based on their perceived loyalty. The NSA employs 32,000 people, but there are very few whistleblowers from that agency.
Who profits and/or who benefits?:
When there is a lack of transparency, it is not obvious what opportunities exist for people to unethically enrich themselves acquire political advantage.
a) the few are the ones utilizing the "light-bringer" allegory upon the many.
b) what if darkness represents the ignorance (dark) of the many; who lack comprehension (light) of the perceivable (inspiration); caused by their consent to the suggested (information) by the few?
c) isn't it the few who utilize sleight of hands; notices of liability; reveals of method; alleviation of karmic retribution by disclosing everything in disguised form?
d) what if the co-conspirators of the suggesting few represents the consenting many who follow the suggested orders willingly; while ignoring to resist the natural order?
e) look at the recent corona narrative...what wasn't disclosed to the public? Didn't the few put "I can't breathe" leads to death right into everyone's face? How does one disclose anything to a public that ignores perceivable reality for suggested fiction?
Helpful if helpful!
Edit: I'm 5 minutes in and I can already tell this is far too rational for this place. Enjoy your banning.