I'm with you on those as well. I cancelled cable tv before 2008 and never ever ever did Twitter or any social media after it. (Snapchat, discord, ticktock, etc)
I'm still an OG Facebook bozo so I'm pretty sure we're not being hypnotized by the Zucc.
I like the Toxo line of thought, because I vaguely remember it brushing across the News and then disappearing into the annals.
It feels like some how we entered some crazy alternate reality and everyone not from here ended up on these forums
The forums represent herding of cattle; while the deliberate contradiction of reasoning represents both ongoing division within the cattle and a litmus test for compliance among the cattle.
Those who get inspired to resist temptations will grow; while those who fall for temptation will experience loss. Meanwhile the farmers of men are exploiting ignorance of perceivable inspiration through suggestion of information; defined; redefined and contradicted by them.
For people complying, I think they are living under a normalcy bias a bit.
a) the many are being domesticated by the suggestions of the few to view the world through the lens of reason aka as a want versus not want; agree vs disagree; true vs false; good vs bad etc. conflict. Reasoning represents the conditioned "norm" for which the few suggest the mainstream narrative.
b) BI'AS, noun - "a weight on the side of a bowl which turns it from a straight line". If one reasons about want vs not want (imbalance); instead of adapting to need/want balance as the choice in-between; then one leans (bias) out of balance.
Hell perhaps I am to a certain degree
Living implies struggling to resist the constant temptation of dying...a temporary adaptation to an ongoing balance. Every moment we choose want over need; we imbalance ourselves to "a certain degree".
In fact my bubble of the world is perfectly fine and then I look on here and I am like “damn the world is fd up.” And I wonder if that is intended.
Fundamentally; this system represents balance; yet most of those within choose to ignore this; hence causing imbalance for each other, which led to the parasitic exploitation of the many by the few.
From your perspective...each one represents a growing ecosystem aka a temporary seed within the ongoing soil of all perceivable (inspiration). You need to adapt to this; while resisting the temptation to want to ignore it for the suggestions by all the other ones.They do not represent the source of anything; they all represent the reaction to the enacting source of everything.
This place (not the forum per se; but the internet as a whole) represents a controlled environment for suggested information aka the utilization of technology to weaponize suggested information...Plato's digital cave allegory. You can still use any aspect of it as inspiration for adaptation; but that requires your free will of choice as resistance (need) to temptation (want).
As for "fd up"...everything suggested (laws of men; communication by languages; rise and fall of civilizations; politics; religions; entertainment; science; all the -isms; branded identities; outcome oriented progressivism; the concept of suggested values; working for instead of representing the center of work and so on) represents a deliberate inversion of everything perceivable...and it's ones consent by free will of choice to any of it that fuels it against all of us.
I believe fear is a powerful tool being doled out in different ways to each side.
Fear implies outcome orientation caused by consent to "believe" a suggested outcome by others. Nature represents the origin for everything within; while moving them towards predefined outcome (death); which implies the need to resist until dying; which is called living. Suggested hope/fear tempts one to ignore resisting that which is for that which isn't; yet which others suggest will be.
As for each side...consent to want or not want any suggested information causes the want vs not want conflict of reason aka division among the many by consent to the suggestions of the few. This choice (want or not want) represents the foundation for every conflict, and before one can make it; one chose want (suggestion) over need (perception).
As choice you aren't on any side...you represent the center (choice) of momentum (balance); causing sides (want vs not want) when ignoring to balance in-between need/want. Consider this...if you choose to step to the left; it implies you came from the right; yet if you choose to step back to the left; it implies you came from the right. The same position (balance) representing left/right for the responding center (choice).
Another one...only while life is being moved from inception towards death; hence being within the momentum of motion; can it have the free will of choice over direction (up/down; left/right; front/back). The many are being deceived to ignore the ever changing moment (um) aka their foundation of existence aka the ongoing balance within which they represent the temporary center (choice).
I think we are being trained to associate traits with groups of people whether they are true at times are not.
a) true implies vs false; hence a rebranded want vs not want conflict of reason. What represents truth within constant change and can those within change define truth?
b) the suggested laws of men are utilized to domesticate free will of choice; while under the laws of nature (the only thing that cannot change within constant change aka the rules that define how change operates) being "free" will of choice implies within the "dom"inance of balance. Choice needs to be unrestricted to operate within a restricting balance otherwise it couldn't adapt to constant change.
c) all the groups represent cattle-pens aka isolated sides within a conflict of reason; herded together in either agreement or disagreement to any suggestion made by their farmers. For example...consent to the suggestion of "abortion" allows the few to rebrand want vs not want into pro-life vs pro-choice. Now they have two distinct groups with malleable traits; defined by the same suggestion, and for those with eyes to see there's also a sleight of hand..."life equals choice". It's like one side uses choice to choose life over choice; while the other side uses choice to chose choice over life; while being alive.
Who's to blame for such an intense level of ignorance?
I do think the over posting of crime by race is intended so eventually one would start to fear every black person.
a) for the few; the only thing that matters about the black vs white conflict; represents the consent of the many to the suggested identitarianism. The trick is to suggest the many to be the same (black or white); which tempts them to ignore that absolutely everything perceivable represents a difference from one another. Moving differentiation represents perceivable inspiration for each one within to sustain self.
b) CRIME, noun [Latin; Greek; to separate, to decree, to divide.]...the living represent the separated; divided "crime" within the separating; self differentiating natural "law". The parasitic few suggest "law enforcement" to tempt the many to ignore being the force of resistance (living) within the force of velocity (dying) and so instead of resisting the natural order; the many are following the suggested orders of the few towards the only outcome (death).
c) RACE, noun [Latin radix ,radius, rod, ray, radiate, etc.]...that represents ones growth potential; ones expressed ecosystem expanding outwards; the sharing of individual self (blood) within the collective self (bloodline) for self sustenance. The race springs from center; through oneself. The parasites suggest it to represent a choice among others. They suggest miscegenation (race mixing) to increase the want for belonging; while simultaneously grow doubt about origin; hence embracing mongrelization (mimicking sameness; while ignoring differentiation).
I think the posting of the extreme side of liberals is so we also dehumanize them
a) all suggested boogeyman tempt to blame others; while shirking responsibility over self.
b) the biggest dehumanization was achieved by the suggestion of animals. HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] + AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.]...that's you aka animated (animal) form (human) within animating flow (inception towards death).
The may are tempted to ignore animation; while pretending that humanity stands above it; yet simultaneously they are tricked to insult each others as animals. All of this bullshit represents minds within the willing state of ignorance. The knowledge (perceivable inspiration) isn't hidden...it's being ignored; willingly denied access to consciousness.
Liberals...conservatives...I believe we are being fed and complying with propaganda as well.
Right there...suggested liberalism and conservatism. Liber (free) represents being free will of choice; while to conserve (guard) represents self sustenance of the living by resisting dying. Now ask anyone about the definition of suggested liberalism and conservatism and they can drown you with books full of suggested explanations about those -isms. This is all self inflicted by ignoring perceivable inspiration for suggested information.
In order to have a war one must first stop seeing each as human.
Within the natural order (balance); to have a war (imbalance), one has to choose to ignore the perceivable order for suggested orders; hence following a chain of command into self destruction; while justifying it as blaming others.
Ask around about definitions for being human and most will answer "not an animal". This represents lack of self discernment of being reacting form (human) within enacting flow (animal). Once again not really hidden; yet easily ignored for tempting suggestions by others about savage animals and sophisticated top of the food chain humans.
many on the left are good people...many black people are wonderful people
Your consent to left vs right; good vs bad; black vs white aka your choice to want vs not want the suggestions of others is what causes the issues and what perpetuates them. Adapt to inspiration aka to the perceivable differences in behavior among other to grow your own comprehension of everything perceivable; which in return will shape the world around in accordance to your reactions. Wanting to help others represents the temptation to ignore the need to sustain self; which is why the few exploit it with suggested humanitarianism (we are the ones that make a better world so let's start giving).
Others have to make the choice to sustain themselves by themselves; but your growth can provide extra inspiration for them.
liberals need to grow a moral compass
Moralism represents suggested restrictions upon free will; while tempting to judge the consequences of choices among one another; while ignoring that judgement of others represents the ignorance of self sustenance.
Rape doesn't represents the conflict between morally right vs morally wrong; but the choice of want over need; in this the temptation of lust luring towards death over the responsibility to propagate for the sustenance of life. Reasoning among moralism distracts the many from adapting with the choices to the expressions of other choices. Those rapes could be prevented if response-ability (choice) is grown in efficiency. Rapists respond to opportunities among reduced resistance; growing efficiency of choice implies growth of resistance to temptations.
Another big one represents pedophiles; who are tempted by childhood innocence; which implies the adulthood guilt aka the ignorance of the many towards self sustenance; which in return increases childhood innocence; hence attracting those who want to exploit it. The choice to ignore balance is what causes the imbalance reactions of others.
to stand up to criminal behavior while not also falling for propaganda.
The suggested laws of men represent the propaganda; that when consented to, allows crime to flourish.
Police are used as law enforcement against the consequences of the crime they enforce beforehand by preventing the citizens to defend themselves against the suggested crimes by the few (drugs; prostitution; human trafficking; poverty; subversion etc.) Crime represents the response to the suggested laws of men, and standing up against crime (choice of not wanting suggested crime) confirms suggested laws of men (domestication of free will to curtail behavior).
one story or a few does not represent actual reality but can be hyped up to seem that it does.
Living represents the story of each one within the narrative of dying. Any other suggested his-story tempts one to ignore this. Perceivable (reality) or suggested (fiction)...your choice.
TEMPT (tempted) -ATION (through action) aka the ongoing process of dying represents the temptation for the temporary living to ignore the need to resist. Resistance demands effort to sustain life; while being moved towards death represents the constant temptation to want to go with the flow; the path of least resistance; down the easy road; following the mainstream down the drain etc.
Everything one perceives is perceivable through motion and that motion represents therefore both the source of all inspiration needed to sustain life by resisting and the constant temptation of being moved towards death by ignoring to resist.
All the suggestions about what is or isn't a temptation tempt one to ignore that choice between need (inspiration for resistance) and want (temptation of information) shapes resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
Temptations would imply something that one would desire but perhaps shouldn’t have.
Everything wanted represents the temptation to ignore everything needed. One (perceiving) within all (perceivable) implies temporary access to everything. Ignoring this for suggestions is what allows others to suggest what one "shouldn't have" like weapons for self defense or free speech for example.
Temptations to comply with the craziness or to look the other way?
That represents you defining yourself by the suggestions of others; instead of adapting to everything perceivable. Question fundamental needs (breathing; drinking; eating; sheltering) and apply your choice to comply (want) or not comply (not want) with the ignored need to adapt?
Choose "not comply" and hold your breath to recalibrate to the natural order enforced upon you. This isn't about compliance; but about ignored response-ability (choice) within a balance based system.
Who are the farmers of men?
The parasitic few represent the response to the ignorance of the many (their host). As one seed within the soil of all; any other one who uses suggestion to direct growth within loss becomes a farmer. Cultural subversion implies cultivation (farming).
Are they not men?
a) "are" implies to be (one thing) out of (everything); while "not" represents ignoring perceivable (everything) for suggested (nothing).
b) men and women represent SEX, noun [Latin sexus; seco, to divide.] aka divided form (life) out of dividing flow (inception towards death) and furthermore; this self differentiation of base flow into ingredient form represents "trans"mutation. Each one represents both male and female aspects; hence the need to sustain self requiring both to find balance with each other (intercourse).
Hence men and wo(mb)men; male and fe(minine) male and of course the rise of a man (adam) causing the divide (rip) for the decline (eve).
c) all represents one in energy. Self discernment of being one within all has to be grown before the oneness of all can be comprehended. Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see: "all for one and one for all".
Are you saying you think we create reality based on auto suggestions?
a) creationism (implies out of nothing) represents the suggested inversion of perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything). The ones perceiving within all perceivable cannot perceive the creation of anything that isn't already available as the source material (energy). One cannot create a "new" thought without shaping it out of already perceivable inspiration.
b) inspiration represents the "auto"matic flow of perceivable to each one perceiving it within; while suggested information represents the choice of those within to react with ignorance to all perceivable.
Reality represents predefined energy; perceivable as ongoing inspiration. Fiction represents what our temporary ignorance thereof shapes within until reality transmutes it all back to source. The parasitic few suggest the many to hold onto fiction; while ignoring the natural order of reality taking it apart. The many are being utilized by the suggestions of the few to build their own tools of self destruction (society aka the beast system) and it's all happening by willing consent.
As a side note when I read your comments I imagine you like Data or Spock from Star Trek.
At the beginning you questioned the bias of the norm...now ask yourself if reading text and then responding by trying to personify whoever wrote it; while applying fictitious information to it...does that represent "normal" behavior?
Anyway; sure I can shitpost like any other; but "been there; done that". Consenting to suggested conformity tempts the individual to ignore growing resistance to temptation.
Inversion.
Mockery.
Doublethink.
And dam. Not fucking monkey is gonna make for a dull weakend.
There's got to be a common factor between us all.
Anyone out there do the DMT/LSD drugs? Is that the only thing that protects us from the brainwash?
Not watching tv
I'm with you on those as well. I cancelled cable tv before 2008 and never ever ever did Twitter or any social media after it. (Snapchat, discord, ticktock, etc)
I'm still an OG Facebook bozo so I'm pretty sure we're not being hypnotized by the Zucc.
I like the Toxo line of thought, because I vaguely remember it brushing across the News and then disappearing into the annals.
The forums represent herding of cattle; while the deliberate contradiction of reasoning represents both ongoing division within the cattle and a litmus test for compliance among the cattle.
Those who get inspired to resist temptations will grow; while those who fall for temptation will experience loss. Meanwhile the farmers of men are exploiting ignorance of perceivable inspiration through suggestion of information; defined; redefined and contradicted by them.
a) the many are being domesticated by the suggestions of the few to view the world through the lens of reason aka as a want versus not want; agree vs disagree; true vs false; good vs bad etc. conflict. Reasoning represents the conditioned "norm" for which the few suggest the mainstream narrative.
b) BI'AS, noun - "a weight on the side of a bowl which turns it from a straight line". If one reasons about want vs not want (imbalance); instead of adapting to need/want balance as the choice in-between; then one leans (bias) out of balance.
Living implies struggling to resist the constant temptation of dying...a temporary adaptation to an ongoing balance. Every moment we choose want over need; we imbalance ourselves to "a certain degree".
Fundamentally; this system represents balance; yet most of those within choose to ignore this; hence causing imbalance for each other, which led to the parasitic exploitation of the many by the few.
From your perspective...each one represents a growing ecosystem aka a temporary seed within the ongoing soil of all perceivable (inspiration). You need to adapt to this; while resisting the temptation to want to ignore it for the suggestions by all the other ones.They do not represent the source of anything; they all represent the reaction to the enacting source of everything.
This place (not the forum per se; but the internet as a whole) represents a controlled environment for suggested information aka the utilization of technology to weaponize suggested information...Plato's digital cave allegory. You can still use any aspect of it as inspiration for adaptation; but that requires your free will of choice as resistance (need) to temptation (want).
As for "fd up"...everything suggested (laws of men; communication by languages; rise and fall of civilizations; politics; religions; entertainment; science; all the -isms; branded identities; outcome oriented progressivism; the concept of suggested values; working for instead of representing the center of work and so on) represents a deliberate inversion of everything perceivable...and it's ones consent by free will of choice to any of it that fuels it against all of us.
Fear implies outcome orientation caused by consent to "believe" a suggested outcome by others. Nature represents the origin for everything within; while moving them towards predefined outcome (death); which implies the need to resist until dying; which is called living. Suggested hope/fear tempts one to ignore resisting that which is for that which isn't; yet which others suggest will be.
As for each side...consent to want or not want any suggested information causes the want vs not want conflict of reason aka division among the many by consent to the suggestions of the few. This choice (want or not want) represents the foundation for every conflict, and before one can make it; one chose want (suggestion) over need (perception).
As choice you aren't on any side...you represent the center (choice) of momentum (balance); causing sides (want vs not want) when ignoring to balance in-between need/want. Consider this...if you choose to step to the left; it implies you came from the right; yet if you choose to step back to the left; it implies you came from the right. The same position (balance) representing left/right for the responding center (choice).
Another one...only while life is being moved from inception towards death; hence being within the momentum of motion; can it have the free will of choice over direction (up/down; left/right; front/back). The many are being deceived to ignore the ever changing moment (um) aka their foundation of existence aka the ongoing balance within which they represent the temporary center (choice).
a) true implies vs false; hence a rebranded want vs not want conflict of reason. What represents truth within constant change and can those within change define truth?
b) the suggested laws of men are utilized to domesticate free will of choice; while under the laws of nature (the only thing that cannot change within constant change aka the rules that define how change operates) being "free" will of choice implies within the "dom"inance of balance. Choice needs to be unrestricted to operate within a restricting balance otherwise it couldn't adapt to constant change.
c) all the groups represent cattle-pens aka isolated sides within a conflict of reason; herded together in either agreement or disagreement to any suggestion made by their farmers. For example...consent to the suggestion of "abortion" allows the few to rebrand want vs not want into pro-life vs pro-choice. Now they have two distinct groups with malleable traits; defined by the same suggestion, and for those with eyes to see there's also a sleight of hand..."life equals choice". It's like one side uses choice to choose life over choice; while the other side uses choice to chose choice over life; while being alive.
Who's to blame for such an intense level of ignorance?
a) for the few; the only thing that matters about the black vs white conflict; represents the consent of the many to the suggested identitarianism. The trick is to suggest the many to be the same (black or white); which tempts them to ignore that absolutely everything perceivable represents a difference from one another. Moving differentiation represents perceivable inspiration for each one within to sustain self.
b) CRIME, noun [Latin; Greek; to separate, to decree, to divide.]...the living represent the separated; divided "crime" within the separating; self differentiating natural "law". The parasitic few suggest "law enforcement" to tempt the many to ignore being the force of resistance (living) within the force of velocity (dying) and so instead of resisting the natural order; the many are following the suggested orders of the few towards the only outcome (death).
c) RACE, noun [Latin radix ,radius, rod, ray, radiate, etc.]...that represents ones growth potential; ones expressed ecosystem expanding outwards; the sharing of individual self (blood) within the collective self (bloodline) for self sustenance. The race springs from center; through oneself. The parasites suggest it to represent a choice among others. They suggest miscegenation (race mixing) to increase the want for belonging; while simultaneously grow doubt about origin; hence embracing mongrelization (mimicking sameness; while ignoring differentiation).
a) all suggested boogeyman tempt to blame others; while shirking responsibility over self.
b) the biggest dehumanization was achieved by the suggestion of animals. HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] + AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.]...that's you aka animated (animal) form (human) within animating flow (inception towards death).
The may are tempted to ignore animation; while pretending that humanity stands above it; yet simultaneously they are tricked to insult each others as animals. All of this bullshit represents minds within the willing state of ignorance. The knowledge (perceivable inspiration) isn't hidden...it's being ignored; willingly denied access to consciousness.
Right there...suggested liberalism and conservatism. Liber (free) represents being free will of choice; while to conserve (guard) represents self sustenance of the living by resisting dying. Now ask anyone about the definition of suggested liberalism and conservatism and they can drown you with books full of suggested explanations about those -isms. This is all self inflicted by ignoring perceivable inspiration for suggested information.
Within the natural order (balance); to have a war (imbalance), one has to choose to ignore the perceivable order for suggested orders; hence following a chain of command into self destruction; while justifying it as blaming others.
Ask around about definitions for being human and most will answer "not an animal". This represents lack of self discernment of being reacting form (human) within enacting flow (animal). Once again not really hidden; yet easily ignored for tempting suggestions by others about savage animals and sophisticated top of the food chain humans.
Your consent to left vs right; good vs bad; black vs white aka your choice to want vs not want the suggestions of others is what causes the issues and what perpetuates them. Adapt to inspiration aka to the perceivable differences in behavior among other to grow your own comprehension of everything perceivable; which in return will shape the world around in accordance to your reactions. Wanting to help others represents the temptation to ignore the need to sustain self; which is why the few exploit it with suggested humanitarianism (we are the ones that make a better world so let's start giving).
Others have to make the choice to sustain themselves by themselves; but your growth can provide extra inspiration for them.
Moralism represents suggested restrictions upon free will; while tempting to judge the consequences of choices among one another; while ignoring that judgement of others represents the ignorance of self sustenance.
Rape doesn't represents the conflict between morally right vs morally wrong; but the choice of want over need; in this the temptation of lust luring towards death over the responsibility to propagate for the sustenance of life. Reasoning among moralism distracts the many from adapting with the choices to the expressions of other choices. Those rapes could be prevented if response-ability (choice) is grown in efficiency. Rapists respond to opportunities among reduced resistance; growing efficiency of choice implies growth of resistance to temptations.
Another big one represents pedophiles; who are tempted by childhood innocence; which implies the adulthood guilt aka the ignorance of the many towards self sustenance; which in return increases childhood innocence; hence attracting those who want to exploit it. The choice to ignore balance is what causes the imbalance reactions of others.
The suggested laws of men represent the propaganda; that when consented to, allows crime to flourish.
Police are used as law enforcement against the consequences of the crime they enforce beforehand by preventing the citizens to defend themselves against the suggested crimes by the few (drugs; prostitution; human trafficking; poverty; subversion etc.) Crime represents the response to the suggested laws of men, and standing up against crime (choice of not wanting suggested crime) confirms suggested laws of men (domestication of free will to curtail behavior).
Living represents the story of each one within the narrative of dying. Any other suggested his-story tempts one to ignore this. Perceivable (reality) or suggested (fiction)...your choice.
TEMPT (tempted) -ATION (through action) aka the ongoing process of dying represents the temptation for the temporary living to ignore the need to resist. Resistance demands effort to sustain life; while being moved towards death represents the constant temptation to want to go with the flow; the path of least resistance; down the easy road; following the mainstream down the drain etc.
Everything one perceives is perceivable through motion and that motion represents therefore both the source of all inspiration needed to sustain life by resisting and the constant temptation of being moved towards death by ignoring to resist.
All the suggestions about what is or isn't a temptation tempt one to ignore that choice between need (inspiration for resistance) and want (temptation of information) shapes resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
Everything wanted represents the temptation to ignore everything needed. One (perceiving) within all (perceivable) implies temporary access to everything. Ignoring this for suggestions is what allows others to suggest what one "shouldn't have" like weapons for self defense or free speech for example.
That represents you defining yourself by the suggestions of others; instead of adapting to everything perceivable. Question fundamental needs (breathing; drinking; eating; sheltering) and apply your choice to comply (want) or not comply (not want) with the ignored need to adapt?
Choose "not comply" and hold your breath to recalibrate to the natural order enforced upon you. This isn't about compliance; but about ignored response-ability (choice) within a balance based system.
The parasitic few represent the response to the ignorance of the many (their host). As one seed within the soil of all; any other one who uses suggestion to direct growth within loss becomes a farmer. Cultural subversion implies cultivation (farming).
a) "are" implies to be (one thing) out of (everything); while "not" represents ignoring perceivable (everything) for suggested (nothing).
b) men and women represent SEX, noun [Latin sexus; seco, to divide.] aka divided form (life) out of dividing flow (inception towards death) and furthermore; this self differentiation of base flow into ingredient form represents "trans"mutation. Each one represents both male and female aspects; hence the need to sustain self requiring both to find balance with each other (intercourse).
Hence men and wo(mb)men; male and fe(minine) male and of course the rise of a man (adam) causing the divide (rip) for the decline (eve).
c) all represents one in energy. Self discernment of being one within all has to be grown before the oneness of all can be comprehended. Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see: "all for one and one for all".
a) creationism (implies out of nothing) represents the suggested inversion of perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything). The ones perceiving within all perceivable cannot perceive the creation of anything that isn't already available as the source material (energy). One cannot create a "new" thought without shaping it out of already perceivable inspiration.
b) inspiration represents the "auto"matic flow of perceivable to each one perceiving it within; while suggested information represents the choice of those within to react with ignorance to all perceivable.
Reality represents predefined energy; perceivable as ongoing inspiration. Fiction represents what our temporary ignorance thereof shapes within until reality transmutes it all back to source. The parasitic few suggest the many to hold onto fiction; while ignoring the natural order of reality taking it apart. The many are being utilized by the suggestions of the few to build their own tools of self destruction (society aka the beast system) and it's all happening by willing consent.
At the beginning you questioned the bias of the norm...now ask yourself if reading text and then responding by trying to personify whoever wrote it; while applying fictitious information to it...does that represent "normal" behavior?
Anyway; sure I can shitpost like any other; but "been there; done that". Consenting to suggested conformity tempts the individual to ignore growing resistance to temptation.