TEMPT (tempted) -ATION (through action) aka the ongoing process of dying represents the temptation for the temporary living to ignore the need to resist. Resistance demands effort to sustain life; while being moved towards death represents the constant temptation to want to go with the flow; the path of least resistance; down the easy road; following the mainstream down the drain etc.
Everything one perceives is perceivable through motion and that motion represents therefore both the source of all inspiration needed to sustain life by resisting and the constant temptation of being moved towards death by ignoring to resist.
All the suggestions about what is or isn't a temptation tempt one to ignore that choice between need (inspiration for resistance) and want (temptation of information) shapes resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
Temptations would imply something that one would desire but perhaps shouldn’t have.
Everything wanted represents the temptation to ignore everything needed. One (perceiving) within all (perceivable) implies temporary access to everything. Ignoring this for suggestions is what allows others to suggest what one "shouldn't have" like weapons for self defense or free speech for example.
Temptations to comply with the craziness or to look the other way?
That represents you defining yourself by the suggestions of others; instead of adapting to everything perceivable. Question fundamental needs (breathing; drinking; eating; sheltering) and apply your choice to comply (want) or not comply (not want) with the ignored need to adapt?
Choose "not comply" and hold your breath to recalibrate to the natural order enforced upon you. This isn't about compliance; but about ignored response-ability (choice) within a balance based system.
Who are the farmers of men?
The parasitic few represent the response to the ignorance of the many (their host). As one seed within the soil of all; any other one who uses suggestion to direct growth within loss becomes a farmer. Cultural subversion implies cultivation (farming).
Are they not men?
a) "are" implies to be (one thing) out of (everything); while "not" represents ignoring perceivable (everything) for suggested (nothing).
b) men and women represent SEX, noun [Latin sexus; seco, to divide.] aka divided form (life) out of dividing flow (inception towards death) and furthermore; this self differentiation of base flow into ingredient form represents "trans"mutation. Each one represents both male and female aspects; hence the need to sustain self requiring both to find balance with each other (intercourse).
Hence men and wo(mb)men; male and fe(minine) male and of course the rise of a man (adam) causing the divide (rip) for the decline (eve).
c) all represents one in energy. Self discernment of being one within all has to be grown before the oneness of all can be comprehended. Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see: "all for one and one for all".
Are you saying you think we create reality based on auto suggestions?
a) creationism (implies out of nothing) represents the suggested inversion of perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything). The ones perceiving within all perceivable cannot perceive the creation of anything that isn't already available as the source material (energy). One cannot create a "new" thought without shaping it out of already perceivable inspiration.
b) inspiration represents the "auto"matic flow of perceivable to each one perceiving it within; while suggested information represents the choice of those within to react with ignorance to all perceivable.
Reality represents predefined energy; perceivable as ongoing inspiration. Fiction represents what our temporary ignorance thereof shapes within until reality transmutes it all back to source. The parasitic few suggest the many to hold onto fiction; while ignoring the natural order of reality taking it apart. The many are being utilized by the suggestions of the few to build their own tools of self destruction (society aka the beast system) and it's all happening by willing consent.
As a side note when I read your comments I imagine you like Data or Spock from Star Trek.
At the beginning you questioned the bias of the norm...now ask yourself if reading text and then responding by trying to personify whoever wrote it; while applying fictitious information to it...does that represent "normal" behavior?
Anyway; sure I can shitpost like any other; but "been there; done that". Consenting to suggested conformity tempts the individual to ignore growing resistance to temptation.
TEMPT (tempted) -ATION (through action) aka the ongoing process of dying represents the temptation for the temporary living to ignore the need to resist. Resistance demands effort to sustain life; while being moved towards death represents the constant temptation to want to go with the flow; the path of least resistance; down the easy road; following the mainstream down the drain etc.
Everything one perceives is perceivable through motion and that motion represents therefore both the source of all inspiration needed to sustain life by resisting and the constant temptation of being moved towards death by ignoring to resist.
All the suggestions about what is or isn't a temptation tempt one to ignore that choice between need (inspiration for resistance) and want (temptation of information) shapes resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
Everything wanted represents the temptation to ignore everything needed. One (perceiving) within all (perceivable) implies temporary access to everything. Ignoring this for suggestions is what allows others to suggest what one "shouldn't have" like weapons for self defense or free speech for example.
That represents you defining yourself by the suggestions of others; instead of adapting to everything perceivable. Question fundamental needs (breathing; drinking; eating; sheltering) and apply your choice to comply (want) or not comply (not want) with the ignored need to adapt?
Choose "not comply" and hold your breath to recalibrate to the natural order enforced upon you. This isn't about compliance; but about ignored response-ability (choice) within a balance based system.
The parasitic few represent the response to the ignorance of the many (their host). As one seed within the soil of all; any other one who uses suggestion to direct growth within loss becomes a farmer. Cultural subversion implies cultivation (farming).
a) "are" implies to be (one thing) out of (everything); while "not" represents ignoring perceivable (everything) for suggested (nothing).
b) men and women represent SEX, noun [Latin sexus; seco, to divide.] aka divided form (life) out of dividing flow (inception towards death) and furthermore; this self differentiation of base flow into ingredient form represents "trans"mutation. Each one represents both male and female aspects; hence the need to sustain self requiring both to find balance with each other (intercourse).
Hence men and wo(mb)men; male and fe(minine) male and of course the rise of a man (adam) causing the divide (rip) for the decline (eve).
c) all represents one in energy. Self discernment of being one within all has to be grown before the oneness of all can be comprehended. Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see: "all for one and one for all".
a) creationism (implies out of nothing) represents the suggested inversion of perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything). The ones perceiving within all perceivable cannot perceive the creation of anything that isn't already available as the source material (energy). One cannot create a "new" thought without shaping it out of already perceivable inspiration.
b) inspiration represents the "auto"matic flow of perceivable to each one perceiving it within; while suggested information represents the choice of those within to react with ignorance to all perceivable.
Reality represents predefined energy; perceivable as ongoing inspiration. Fiction represents what our temporary ignorance thereof shapes within until reality transmutes it all back to source. The parasitic few suggest the many to hold onto fiction; while ignoring the natural order of reality taking it apart. The many are being utilized by the suggestions of the few to build their own tools of self destruction (society aka the beast system) and it's all happening by willing consent.
At the beginning you questioned the bias of the norm...now ask yourself if reading text and then responding by trying to personify whoever wrote it; while applying fictitious information to it...does that represent "normal" behavior?
Anyway; sure I can shitpost like any other; but "been there; done that". Consenting to suggested conformity tempts the individual to ignore growing resistance to temptation.