Your comment is a stack of assumptions, and has nothing to do with the actuality of the matter.
You mention tests. Here's a simple one, you don't even have to move: does water bend? Are the cargo ships now at sea tilted relative to your position? Yes or no?
Yes, I'm aware of meniscus, and you'd be right to assume that would be my reply. We both know that surface tension would produce concave/convex water surfaces only if the area were tiny enough, as depicted. Surface tension may still occur at the edge as you increase the surface area, but the rest of the water would level out. (I may be mistaken about this.)
I may have been a bit harsh in my previous reply, but perhaps you'd reconsider answering?
The real question is, barring negligible and irrelevant surface tension artifacts of minuscule surfaces, what is the measured and measurable shape of waters surface at rest?
Bubbles are often spherical - does that prove the shape of the gas? The logic you are trying to employ (to play apologist) is silly!
I asked two simple questions - can you really not answer either of them? In any case, I have lots to say - but I can’t and won’t make you talk to me to learn what they are!
Such are the tactics of a flat earth shill
A shill is someone being paid by (or useful idiot to) the psyop. The psyop’s purpose is to STOP you from ever seriously discussing/studying the subject (typically by saying offensively stupid things as loudly and often as possible). I want the complete opposite!
But unfortunately, that isn't me.
Great! Then ignore my diction and focus on the meaning and content instead! If you didn’t understand what I meant, or would like it rephrased into words with less syllables - just ask!
The two simple questions are :
what is the measured and measurable shape of waters surface at rest? (ignoring irrelevant meniscus effects, because they only happen with small surface area and do not curve the way the globe model requires them to in any case)
Bubbles are often spherical - does that prove the shape of the gas?
Your comment is a stack of assumptions, and has nothing to do with the actuality of the matter.
You mention tests. Here's a simple one, you don't even have to move: does water bend? Are the cargo ships now at sea tilted relative to your position? Yes or no?
Meniscus (liquid)
I'll save you the reply and write it myself: "Ohhhh, you know what I meant!"
Yes, I'm aware of meniscus, and you'd be right to assume that would be my reply. We both know that surface tension would produce concave/convex water surfaces only if the area were tiny enough, as depicted.
Surface tension may still occur at the edge as you increase the surface area, but the rest of the water would level out.(I may be mistaken about this.)I may have been a bit harsh in my previous reply, but perhaps you'd reconsider answering?
The real question is, barring negligible and irrelevant surface tension artifacts of minuscule surfaces, what is the measured and measurable shape of waters surface at rest?
Bubbles are often spherical - does that prove the shape of the gas? The logic you are trying to employ (to play apologist) is silly!
I asked two simple questions - can you really not answer either of them? In any case, I have lots to say - but I can’t and won’t make you talk to me to learn what they are!
A shill is someone being paid by (or useful idiot to) the psyop. The psyop’s purpose is to STOP you from ever seriously discussing/studying the subject (typically by saying offensively stupid things as loudly and often as possible). I want the complete opposite!
Great! Then ignore my diction and focus on the meaning and content instead! If you didn’t understand what I meant, or would like it rephrased into words with less syllables - just ask!
The two simple questions are :
Same shape as your mom's penis because your mom gay
Пошёл на хуй cyka
a) what comes first...the form or the flow-state of water?
b) SHAPE, verb - "to form within the mold of flow"