Capitalism in its western form have some restrictions. Some ways of making profit accounted as crime.
- Killing competitor is a crime.
- Theft is a crime.
- Patent infringement is a crime.
- Insider trading is a crime. And so on.
So, capitalism could have restrictions.
What if there could be another capitalism, with another, slightly different set of restrictions?
Say,
- Killing competitor is a crime.
- Theft is a crime.
- Usury is a crime.
- Profiteering (all that stock games) is a crime.
- Intentional limiting of customer in a bought product usage (all that "planned obsolescence", "usage licenses" and "authorized service only") is a crime. with keeping all other freedoms of private business you could find in western capitalism.
Will it still be a capitalism? Do capitalism you defend should have usury and profiteering as essential part of it?
Just asking for a friend who think that western type of capitalism is doomed and sooner or later will be completely demolished by insane elites. So we will have to build new type of capitalism, that have no vulnerabilites that allow creation and existence of elites. :)
What rules and restrictions such capitalism should have to avoid a core possibility of elite formation?
Take in mind, that under "elite" I mean parasitic bastards, like current ones, not a meritocratic elite, like best engineers or best business organizers.
The very idea of money being a religion is marxist. There is no such thing as "capitalism". Everyone needs money, everyone uses it, some do despicable things to obtain it especially marxists.
I like the idea of no usury.
The problem is we don't see our fellow man as constituents, we see them as something to be exploited. Marxists are far ahead in the exploitation game and they project that onto "capitalists".
"Capitalism" is also the word used by Marxists to have something for Communism to oppose.
Before the Soviets introduced it into translations of "Das Kapital" (Marx didn't use it himself) it was just "commerce".
True. Marx & Engels use "kapitalistische produktionsform" in their writings (along with "socialistishe" and "kommunistishe produktionsform"). However, term "capitalism" was not invention of Soviet translators, that term was introduced in some Marx & Engels followers in the West around 1860s. There was no any Soviets at the time.
Yes, the term was a French invention, years before, but not use like it is today.
Marx-ism...take the suggested cult of personality (marx) out and look at the suggested -ism; which represents choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law. If one consents to a suggested -ism; then one consents to be contracted under the choice of those suggesting it.
The industrialization of this contract law is called RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" aka choice binding choice by means of suggestion. The original bond under natural law represents being choice the reacting choice at the center of an enacted, perceivable balance (need/want for living within dying).
Money aka M-ONE-Y aka MY ONE represents ones suggested ownership claim upon other ones; utilizing the aforementioned contract law (choice to choice) to tempt ignorance towards being choice (perceiving evaluation) within balance (perceivable value).
In short....money tempts choice to consent to a substitute value suggested by the choice of others; which a) gives other the power to evaluate reality for all those who consent to ignore it and b) it systematically devalues ones choice of evaluation within all perceivable value; since others are gonna parasitically squeeze the shit out of ones ignorance.
Every suggested fiction (-isms) represents the ignorance of those consenting to it, and by consenting to it; they mentally uphold the suggested definition thereof; which they react to. The may are tempted to view suggested fiction as perceivable reality.
No other life-form uses money to sustain themselves; the majority of our own species lives under so called "world wide poverty"; hence with next to no access to money, and the so called rich don't use money, since they already claim ownership over everything the ignorant many consented monetary value to by their consenting choice of evaluation.
As the ones perceiving within all perceivable; ones status quo represents the mimicry and expression of everything perceivable, and yet the many are so ignorant that they consent to allow the few to claim ownership over "intellectual property" through copyright. The perceiving ones are being tricked to ignore the right to copy all perceivable for the sustenance of self. The only restriction upon "free" will of choice represents its foundation aka the "dom"inance of balance enacted upon it...free-dom.
Who told that? You need money only in current system. In another systems the concept of money could be completely senseless. You don't need money in the society where you cant be owner (one that WEF dream to build). You also don't need money in society where you could easily create anything you need.
I agree, but that is not absolute thing. You could find examples of non-exploiting societies in some families, groups of friends, may be even in some communities. However that examples have a limit - number of members, every person should know each other personally and fully. And humans can't personally and fully know more than, I suppose, around hundred persons. That examples are not scalable.
Marxism, really, is some kind of two-caste society, where one small caste is fully exploit another using ideology. Some kind of sect where regular members praise and feed priests. Money is not needed in that system, meanwhile.
Wrong. You need capitol to rent
Create it FROM WHAT? Thin fucking air? That's more of a pipedream than anything a communist dumb shit would say.
I thought the most obvious would be a bartering system but you still need some metric to compare items.
It might work with two people finding eachother in the desert. One has water and the other has bread, but as a "system" with more than 2 people it doesn't fucking work.
Yeah, with jews stealing everything and putting ethnic Russians in camps. You're full of shit. Communists still needed money, just because they starved citizens doesn't mean they didn't need and use money. All of your communist leaders were rich.
Go back to cannibalism then if that's what your dumb ass wants. People didnt need money in bolshevist Russia because they fucking ATE EACHOTHER.
You will be provided bed and food for free if you are a good obeying citizen doing you everyday mandatory work.
You will not believe, but you could synthesise a lot of things literally from thin air if you have enough energy and appropriate technology. You again will not believe ne, but even plants do it without any problems. There is also soil around to use.
Also, there is such thing like fusion, that allow making any substance you need, if, again, you have enough energy and apropriate tech to do it.
You could literally make anything form thin air. Two questions - energy and tech. And, somehow, authorities trying hard to deprive you from both.
There was attempts in late USSR to build such global system for making global barter possible. But USSR was crushed and that research was buried.
Works easily. With more than 2 people. First have potatoes and want spade, second have spade and want honey, third have honey and want potatoes. Easy as fuck if they are smart enough to just share about their needs and existing commodities to each other. First give potatoes to third, third give honey to second, second give spade to first. I witnessed much more complex schemes among businesses in early 1990s when the money cost nothing in crashed USSR. First Russian stocks was barter ones, where multiple businesses shared their needs and commodities and finding solutions for their problems. If there would heve been powerful enough computers and networks, it could work flawlessly. However, authorities have no ability to tax that deals, so barter was prohibited.
However, barter is not necessary. In modern world the most valuable thing is energy. Everybody need it and, what is the most important, you could mathematically calculate the "price" of any commodity in energy. Energy unit could be the "money" for trade.
How? You exactly describe that two marxism casts - Jews who gain the profit and Russians that work in camps for food.
Fascinating to see such rant as a reaction to simple and obvious assumptions and examples. :) What's the cause? Are you shure that money is not something sacral for you?
https://youtu.be/0CTG7h2cuNc
James Lindsay's podcast is a great place to start. He's very knowledgeable.
There was a jew Rothschild who changed his name to "Karl Marx". He took concepts from German philosophy and inverted it, as satanists do. The ideas of Karl Marx are not original, you can trace them through philosophers like Hegel. The "Hegelian dialectic" is their method.
Marxism is a religion. They say they hate religion but they're really just anti-christian. They use alchemical nomenclature. They destroy with the thought that's they'll rebuild it better but they never build anything, they only destroy.
Critical race theory is race marxism. They want to destroy white people because "oppression"
They want to fuck kids because that's "sexual oppression"
They make everyone trannies which is gender Marxism, the idea that everyone is the same and infinitely malleable.
Look at any of the fake "revolutions" they've instituted. It never goes through the steps Marx laid out, it just goes right to murdering different ethnic groups.
The bolsheviks in Russia said the poor farmers were "oppressing " everyone so they killed them. Then they genocided all of Ukraine when there was nobody left to grow food.
The Marxists of today are cultural marxists. They're destroying culture in the name of "tolerance" while they don't "tolerate" anyone who isn't a child fucking communist.
There's a lot to go over. Succinctly, marxism is a jewish , antichristian, religion based on thievery while crying you're the victim.
I can confirm this.
Marxism is centered on "oppression". Marxism just decalre any exploitation evil. Yes, exploitation could be evil, but that does not mean that if I hire somebody to help me in my workshop it is evil exploitation. But at the same time the exploitation of citizens by authorities is a good thing.
That marxist idea - to make "opression" from anything and blame everybody in that "crime" leaving that anything perfecly legal to use for ideological "priests" have a wide use in nearly every shit we observe now.
Ok, pedophile
Go ahead and "debunk" the fact that 95% of bolshevist government were jews.
I'll wait
https://communities.win/c/NationalSocialism/p/15HvPqSYNV
This doesn't take too long to read
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/
That is a proposal on society structure created by Marx and Engels. It includes some kind of philosophy with some basic laws (questionalble and unproved), definition of communism and description of ideology that should be accepted by that future society. All marxism is stated in few extremely boring books. Marx and Engels followers tried to enhance and develop that doctrine, but separated in opinions and started to kill each other.
Shortly, marxism is a howto for building communism. That howto was never fully implemented, and in my opinion will never really work.
There is few interesting tips in that howto, but that interesting and useful tips are greatly cancelled and hidden by any implementors. The example of one of such interesting tip - https://conspiracies.win/p/11S0Nl6aJl/one-thing-they-dont-want-you-to-/