Capitalism in its western form have some restrictions. Some ways of making profit accounted as crime.
- Killing competitor is a crime.
- Theft is a crime.
- Patent infringement is a crime.
- Insider trading is a crime. And so on.
So, capitalism could have restrictions.
What if there could be another capitalism, with another, slightly different set of restrictions?
Say,
- Killing competitor is a crime.
- Theft is a crime.
- Usury is a crime.
- Profiteering (all that stock games) is a crime.
- Intentional limiting of customer in a bought product usage (all that "planned obsolescence", "usage licenses" and "authorized service only") is a crime. with keeping all other freedoms of private business you could find in western capitalism.
Will it still be a capitalism? Do capitalism you defend should have usury and profiteering as essential part of it?
Just asking for a friend who think that western type of capitalism is doomed and sooner or later will be completely demolished by insane elites. So we will have to build new type of capitalism, that have no vulnerabilites that allow creation and existence of elites. :)
What rules and restrictions such capitalism should have to avoid a core possibility of elite formation?
Take in mind, that under "elite" I mean parasitic bastards, like current ones, not a meritocratic elite, like best engineers or best business organizers.
Marx-ism...take the suggested cult of personality (marx) out and look at the suggested -ism; which represents choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law. If one consents to a suggested -ism; then one consents to be contracted under the choice of those suggesting it.
The industrialization of this contract law is called RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" aka choice binding choice by means of suggestion. The original bond under natural law represents being choice the reacting choice at the center of an enacted, perceivable balance (need/want for living within dying).
Money aka M-ONE-Y aka MY ONE represents ones suggested ownership claim upon other ones; utilizing the aforementioned contract law (choice to choice) to tempt ignorance towards being choice (perceiving evaluation) within balance (perceivable value).
In short....money tempts choice to consent to a substitute value suggested by the choice of others; which a) gives other the power to evaluate reality for all those who consent to ignore it and b) it systematically devalues ones choice of evaluation within all perceivable value; since others are gonna parasitically squeeze the shit out of ones ignorance.
Every suggested fiction (-isms) represents the ignorance of those consenting to it, and by consenting to it; they mentally uphold the suggested definition thereof; which they react to. The may are tempted to view suggested fiction as perceivable reality.
No other life-form uses money to sustain themselves; the majority of our own species lives under so called "world wide poverty"; hence with next to no access to money, and the so called rich don't use money, since they already claim ownership over everything the ignorant many consented monetary value to by their consenting choice of evaluation.
As the ones perceiving within all perceivable; ones status quo represents the mimicry and expression of everything perceivable, and yet the many are so ignorant that they consent to allow the few to claim ownership over "intellectual property" through copyright. The perceiving ones are being tricked to ignore the right to copy all perceivable for the sustenance of self. The only restriction upon "free" will of choice represents its foundation aka the "dom"inance of balance enacted upon it...free-dom.