Just A Reminder:: Everything You Know Is A Lie - World Population
(media.scored.co)
Comments (43)
sorted by:
Queen Elizabeth privately owns 2.6 billion acres. There could be more habitable land if she wasn't full of greed. Just the largest example of land hoarding.
Y. W.
Also illustrates how little impact human activity has on global climate.
When a single volcano eruption emits more co2 than the entire human population does in a year, you know you're being lied to.
When they say the oceans are rising due to polar melting, yet the maldives which are 8 inches above sea level continue to draw tourists, you know you're being lied to.
I'm retarded. What exactly is this picture implying? That the population of earth is bigger than they say? Or smaller?
That Earth ain't even close to full.
Fair enough.
Either way, I've always suspected the actual population much more.
Hans Rosling pointed out that the human race reached "peak child" in the early 2000s. That is (if trends remain unaltered) the most children that will ever be born in a year, with ever fewer thereafter. He has a very entertaining and informative TED presentation on human population.
It's quite sad when you think about it. Unless you're a Lefty death cultist.
Overall peak or local peak? I would imagine there's a lot of up and down over longer time scales.
Overall peak, entire human race. Make sure to watch his TED Talk, you won't be sorry (or your money back!).
I'll go look for it
It's an interesting way to grasp the enormity of large numbers (billions) but 1 person per square meter isn't habitable. NYC is considered very crowded with 1 person per 96 square meters if I did my math right (27,000 people per square mile).
To fit the world population into a crowded mega city as dense as NYC it would need to be bigger than Texas (277,000 square miles), which is logistical nightmare to say the least.
If you take an urban sprawl city like Phoenix, with a density of 2800 people per square mile you'd need a megacity almost the size of Australia (2.7 million square miles). More realistic, but still quite challenging to run a city that size.
Hawaii is only 10mil Sq meters though.
I did my math wrong cause I'm American. You're correct.
Well ... if you'd quit dipping your wick in the slaves, Mr. Jeffersonian Man.
Were farming up here.
a) NUMBER; noun - "the designation of a unit" + UNIT; noun (Latin unitas) - "the state of being one; oneness". ALL perceivable designates each ONE perceiving it through self differentiation.
b) the parasitic few tempt the many to ignore oneself by suggesting them to count other ones as two; three; four etc.
Sleight of hand: "I'm the Count and I love to count things; would you like to count with me?" If one consents to the suggestion of counting then its open sesame for others to put numbers into ones memory (mind).
c) true (want) vs lie (not want) tempt to ignore adaption to constant change (need). The natural order (life being moved from inception towards death) doesn't suggest either true or false information; it communicates perceivable inspiration for those being moved to adapt to.
d) KNOWLEDGE; noun - "to perceive". Truth vs Lie represents in response to suggested.
What the fuck is all this babble. ??? Anyway, I hope this makes sense to someone.
He makes sense to no one.
No they don't. At least they are polite.
I can politely take a crap on your kitchen table. Doesn't make it any better.
Why would you even go there? Unnecessary. They are polite with their ramblings. Gheez.
Hey. I think I just came up with s shtick . Dig this. I follow you around, and in every one of your threads, I post exerts from the bible, and juxtapose them against cute puppy pictures, while claiming I exist on a higher plain. And the more you complain, the more obscure the biblical text becomes, as long as the dog pictures becoming more hostile and violent, up until I am posting links to disturbing images of dog fights in a retaliatory manner.
why (adverb) So whether you eat or drink or whatever, like do it all for the glory of God. 1 sillyboy 10:31
https://pixabay.com/photos/rottweiler-puppy-dog-background-869018/
What was the topic of this thread again? It's a real mess now, and you and I both helped u/free-will-of-choice/ to line up, and take a shit on u/LaughlinPrepper1 kitchen table.
Obviously you are mistaken. I barely post here. Comment more than anything else. Talking about shitting on kitchen tables and posting scripture. Oxymoronic, no?
Silly boy.
Queen Elizabeth privately owns 2.6 billion acres. There could be more habital land if she wasn't full of greed. Just the largest example of land hoarding.
Does "two" represent a perceivable state or does it imply one using choice to count other ones as suggestible "two"?
If everything perceivable within nature represents a different one; then wouldn't counting tempt to ignore that?
How does nature communicate numbers?
Yes it does, and the apple jacks represent love. Does the apple jacks represent adding the apples yourself? If nothing is perceivable within nature, do we count the apple jacks in the box? Or in the bowl? Now does nature communicate in apples? Hungry? Hungry for apples?
Can you show me two things that are the same; when perceiving them implies each one to be at a different position?
Love (want) implies vs hate (not want). A rebranding to distract from the choice made before.
If apple jacks represents want; then you ignored perceivable (need) for suggested (want). Perception represents the only source that adds to those perceiving it.
Perception implies as one thing perceiving all things. Suggested no thing ignores that. For us to count apple jacks in the box; I first would have to consent to the suggested box. I hereby resist that suggestion.
Whatever you suggest represents the sales-pitch for the underlying contract law between choice (consent) and choice (suggestion). I adapt to perceivable natural as choice in response to balance. I have apple-trees though and in about six to eight weeks its harvest season again. Be patient.
Communication from flow to form implies every form perceivable.
Perceivable need of hunger.
Suggested want for taste tempting to ignore perceivable need for hunger.
You're fucking retarded.
And you unquestionably had the choice to suggest me to be that.
Why would the perceiving suggest "you are" when everything perceivable is predefined? If you don't suggest "you are reality"; then would reality not be real? How could you define something with your suggested words; without tricking others to consent that you can?
Nobody trusts you.
Worst bot ever in the history of bots