so, you're telling me a plane did this?
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (43)
sorted by:
Planes hit the twin towers. Thousands of eyewitnesses, captured by professional and amateur photographers from literally every angle possible.
The no plane theory (with regards to the twin towers) is deliberate disinformation designed to discredit legitimate questions. Someone went to a lot of effort to produce some slick videos and presentations. There are literally 1000 problems with the governments version of 911, but every time retards latch onto to these absurd fringe theories.
Planes hit WTC but probably not Pentagon
Or building 7
R/C Planes flew into strtegically placed demolition charges. Argument settled. Continue with discussion.
Blablabla.
Mass formation has to be created, it doesnt happen spontaniously.
I don't see why it couldn't have been a combination of techniques. Thermite or detonators might react to Hutchison effects in a way that obviated the need to wire all the detonators together. A neutron bomb placed way down below the basement sub-floors could have helped weaken the structure and help account for such pulverization. There were probably backup plans in case the detonators didn't go off as needed.
I always felt like they were fake wings added to a cruise missile.
not sure which 9/11 doc has it, but there's great (as in hysterically implausible) footage of either a NOVA or PopMech "expert" explaining how all the debris became essentially a fluid that continued through/into the building.
Disintegrated on impact. Although I think they found the fan blade turbine of a different engine further inside the complex. Something about the impact caused it to become smaller and a different model/design.
There was a plane engine among the debris, which more than strongly suggest it was a real plane. There were eyewitnesses that saw the plane as well. That doesn't mean it wasn't an inside job, but there was a plane. I'd guess it was remotely controlled.
a missile could have used a plane engine. that's what i would do
...if i had a missile. ...and an audit to hide. ...and a pentagon that needed a remodel. ...and the heart of a traitor. ...and an addiction to Israeli cock. ...and was being blackmailed by whoever the Bushes serve.
ever looked into the numbers of 9/11? The flight numbers (93=17+76), wtc is 1776 ft tall, now the nwo wtc looks like a syringe (covid backwards “Di voc” means summon twins). I could and have scribbled pages of synchronicities. Like a fn madman. they went from 2 (twin) towers to 0 towers and built 1 tower that is 1776ft tall. Event 201. Agenda 21.
Then of course george floyd (allegedly) killed in the twin cities under the sign of gemini (the twins), dude stood on his neck for 8m 46sec. First twin tower hit at 8:46 (movie called 8:46 about twin towers). 846 in the strongs concordance is “walls”. John Mellencamp, “when the walls (twin towers) come tumbling down”, george floyd’s most distributed pic in press, he is standing in front of a “wall”.
I have to get back to work. lol.
side note: (your username) 8675309 is a prime number.
I call it scripted reality. The basis of all language and world events all have common denominators, numbers, astrology. (not the watered down astrology, but the mayan and egyptian study of astrology/astronomy).
Did you hear about the “red dragon” showing up in “virgo” (virgin) in 2017 (revelation 12: The Woman Giving Birth and the Dragon)? Google sky images blocked it out. Why?
Could be a larp, but still interesting that the vatican has invested millions in infrared telescopes for the past decade, because they are looking for “signs” in the sky. They recently found a sign and “google sky images” just happened to block out this particular “sign”? You can still see the red dragon in “nasa archives”. apparently it’s moving closer towards virgo’s “birth canal”.
Somewhat off subject but was just looking into it again (prophecy in the sky). I have found that dates, numbers, prophecy, astrology cross through nearly all “religions”. The mayans predicted the great reset (2012)…and here we are..coincidence?
This picture is not telling the best story.
When the plane hit, those upper floors were intact. It's very likely/possible that the plastics survived the heat of impact and temporary fires that occurred on the lower level.
What I find more interesting is that the plane somehow hit that building without knocking down the telephone poles in this picture.
Now I know, I know, it probably flew in at a different angle. There was a documentary called "Loose Change" that explored a bunch of the inconsistencies from that day. There were some telephone poles on the ground, but they looked like someone unbolted them and knocked them over rather than sheered off by an airplane wing.
A New Pearl Harbor has pretty good footage analysis from the two security cameras the public has been allowed to see.
What happened to the jet fuel?
Flashed off. Impact would have vaporized it, vapor flash burns off instantly in a big fireball. Anything that caught fire from that heat gets to keep burning. But the jet fuel is gone after the first couple seconds.
Yes.
Explain these: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8
I'll bet you won't even attempt to.
the engine doesn't come from the model of plane that supposedly hit the pentagon
nothing in vid explains away possibility of smaller airplane or airplane shaped missile
what your video doesn't explain is all the professional pilots with thousands of hours in the type of aircraft that supposedly hit the pentagon having to make multiple attempts at the same flight path in simulators.
the video doesn't at all explain how the airplane maintained it's course despite the ground effects of travelling so low to the ground for hundreds of feet on the flight characteristics/handling of the airplane type that supposedly hit the pentagon.
...but thanks for giving me a head's up on what engineering firm never to hire.
(incorrect)[https://files.catbox.moe/s88oz4]. (EDIT, the Catbox link wasn't working, so here is, yuck, imgur: https://i.imgur.com/0stu3tX.jpg)
I guess it somehow made the exact contact with every light pole that the larger aircraft's wingspan matches perfectly by zig-zagging?!
Professional bias - they have decades of muscle memory of what the NEVER do because it can cause a crash. By the way, this is EXPLICITY addressed as a concern from the report by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth that conducted the experiments you are referencing - how about you read the whole thing, not the headline and consider yourself informed.
Show me your FAA license and how many hours do you have solo? You're a typical nutjob making the rest of us who are aware of things like the fact that we absolutely shot down flight 93 with an AIM-9M from an Florida ANG F-16 that then landed at Wright Patterson afterward look like idiots.
Tell me again how a wall collapse would cause damage to the next section of the building's contents. It's almost as if load bearing walls exist for a reason.
You want to accuse actual engineers of not knowing what the fuck they are doing, I would bet a paycheck you couldn't engineer a dugout in the woods that survives a season.
this comment glows. and i'd know :)
"Anyone that disagrees with me or has information I didn't have is a CIA spook"
GTFO and go back to reddit with that bullshit faggot.
9/11 the new Pearl harbor. must watch documentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rq9nUPs2RAk
worth a couple viewings. i just re-listened/watched the long version last weekend. it made regrouting a bathroom tolerable :)
Look, even though the plane was on fire, that doesn't mean that Hilary Clinton didn't win the lottery, ok? Why are we even in Japan?
Walter gotta Reed a little more into this one... https://pic8.co/sh/QxMcfI.jpg
THE SAURUS (lizard) aka amphibious animal; hence amphibious form (life) within animating flow (inception towards death). That being said...I've never trusted lizards... right from the gecko.