I looked into this "missile alert" quite deeply when it happened. Turns out it was real: a nuclear-tipped cruise missile fired from an Argentinian sub stolen by the Israelis. The missile was shot down and the sub destroyed by White Hat military forces.
Think I'm kidding? I'm creative, but not that good. It's better than Tom Clancy material, IMO, and I'd write up the story but it's long I doubt anyone would be interested, let alone believe it.
I don't think I fell for fake news, since I'm the only one saying it, You might like to link us all to where this "news" is for which I fell.
For those interested in researching this event, here's a key piece of the puzzle:
Then the audible sirens at Pearl Harbor, which I can see from my porch went off, saying, "Ballistic missile approaching, seek immediate shelter." That's when it got very, very real.
You can discard the rest of the article as it is only this one fact we are after.
It would have been the military, of course, who originally detected the missile, and they set off their own alert system at Pearl. Why would the military base get missile alerts from the state? They wouldn't, nor would any sensible person make a military base dependent on the correct functioning of the same organization that runs the DMV. That is to say, a false alarm by the state would not set off alerts at the base.
There is much more to the story but as I noted, no one is really interested. Anyway, researchers can go with something about XML and MP3 if they find whatever that means more persuasive.
Rather that ask for further information, you simply shout about your own conclusions. So stereotypical of the numerous fools around. Yet another illustration, as if we needed one.
How old was this post? What normal person would even care this long after? Are shills that concerned about clouding the issue? Makes me even more sure about my conclusions, as will any astute reader seeing this.
Whatever is shown on your infographic I'm sure falls into the category of "not even wrong". If anyone is so stupid to believe it, they are free to do so as there are no restrictions on gullibility. And on a personal note, I couldn't possibly care less about anything further you have to say on the issue.
But in true shill fashion, you will not be content to leave it at that. Prove me right, will you?
I looked into this "missile alert" quite deeply when it happened. Turns out it was real: a nuclear-tipped cruise missile fired from an Argentinian sub stolen by the Israelis. The missile was shot down and the sub destroyed by White Hat military forces.
Think I'm kidding? I'm creative, but not that good. It's better than Tom Clancy material, IMO, and I'd write up the story but it's long I doubt anyone would be interested, let alone believe it.
Give it a shot, it may be ignored or it may go viral.
I don't think I fell for fake news, since I'm the only one saying it, You might like to link us all to where this "news" is for which I fell.
For those interested in researching this event, here's a key piece of the puzzle:
Breaking Down What Really Happened During the Hawaii False Alert
You can discard the rest of the article as it is only this one fact we are after.
It would have been the military, of course, who originally detected the missile, and they set off their own alert system at Pearl. Why would the military base get missile alerts from the state? They wouldn't, nor would any sensible person make a military base dependent on the correct functioning of the same organization that runs the DMV. That is to say, a false alarm by the state would not set off alerts at the base.
There is much more to the story but as I noted, no one is really interested. Anyway, researchers can go with something about XML and MP3 if they find whatever that means more persuasive.
Rather that ask for further information, you simply shout about your own conclusions. So stereotypical of the numerous fools around. Yet another illustration, as if we needed one.
How old was this post? What normal person would even care this long after? Are shills that concerned about clouding the issue? Makes me even more sure about my conclusions, as will any astute reader seeing this.
Whatever is shown on your infographic I'm sure falls into the category of "not even wrong". If anyone is so stupid to believe it, they are free to do so as there are no restrictions on gullibility. And on a personal note, I couldn't possibly care less about anything further you have to say on the issue.
But in true shill fashion, you will not be content to leave it at that. Prove me right, will you?
S-42 San Juan?
That's the boat, yes, good work.