Hmm what could be causing it?
(tacanow.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
AUT (from aug; to increase) -ISM (consent to suggested information; while ignoring perceivable inspiration). Which brings us to...
Consent to suggested statistics about increase of sickness sounds like a probable cause...
You neither got the entomology correct, nor your logical order, as that the word's root meaning does not "bring us to" the clausal Question in the title.
And this:
Jesus fucking Christ. That's word salad, with a side of psilocybin dressing.
a) being moved from inception towards death represents the perceivable natural order; the one the life within needs to resist. Those who ignore need (perceivable) for want (suggested) are being tricked to reason (logic) among each other about the correctness versus incorrectness of the suggested.
I didn't use any suggested logical order; I used implication upon the perceivable natural order.
b) ENTOMOL'OGY, noun [Gr. insect, to cut, discourse.] - "that part of zoology which treats of insects; the science or history and description of insects".
c) aut; form autos (self) represents form (growth) within flow (loss); hence the potential for increase + nature doesn't suggest information; so every -ism implies being suggested by the choice of others.
d) can neither/nor exist within an if/then system? How?
The root of all perceivable meaning originates from the natural order; hence being moved forwards; therefore bringing life towards death. All suggested meaning tempts one to ignore the perceived meaning; hence reaching death quicker.
Another example of reasoning...believer (JC) vs non-believer (fucking)...deliberately put together as a contradiction to both sides; which represents talmudic reasoning.
What if "word salad" represents the justification for lack of comprehending perceived meaning (sound); while reasoning about suggested meaning (words)?
DRESS, verb - "to adjust; to put in good order; to arrange in a line". Are you suggesting that psychedelic medication should be used to adjust the behavior of others? Wouldn't that cause development disabilities and why is it that the so called jews who push psychoanalysis are also pushing psychedelic medication as treatments?
Why are the many bombarded with suggested surveillance charts about exponentially increasing sicknesses and where are the surveillance charts for healthy growth?
No. Everything you have said here is wrong.
a) how does nature communicate a "no" state?
b) how could perceivable be wrong; when it requires the perceiving to make the choice to suggest that something perceivable is "right" or "wrong"?
c) if choice represents a response ability; then how could it define what something "is" without ignoring that the definable already "was" before?
d) why do you self restrict being "questionable" by trying to shut down the questions of others with reasoning (yes vs no; right vs wrong; want vs not want etc.)?
Stop posting.
Suggesting "stop" tempts to ignore perceived motion aka life being moved from inception towards death. How could there be a cessation of motion (stop) within motion?
a) POST, adjective - "suborned; hired to do what is wrong". Who would hire me and for what? Also; how could I propagate "what is wrong"; when I call out the conflict of reason (right vs wrong) tempting others to consent to divide each other?
b) POST, verb- "to travel with speed". Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents not just traveling within speed; but being the temporary resistance within ongoing velocity. A sleight of hand for this represents the movie "Speed"; which was all about temporary form (bus) struggling within the momentum (stay above 50mph) of ongoing flow (traffic).
a) "you can't be" represents a self contradiction; since a perceivable "you" implies for whoever is perceived to already "be". How could one suggest a "you" to not be; without a being "you" to make suggestion upon?
b) SE'RIOUS, adjective [Latin serius.] - "grave in manner or disposition; solemn; not light". How could anything out of the source of light be "not light"? Doesn't darkness represent the absence of light; hence implying the response to being within light?