Hmm what could be causing it?
(tacanow.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
a) being moved from inception towards death represents the perceivable natural order; the one the life within needs to resist. Those who ignore need (perceivable) for want (suggested) are being tricked to reason (logic) among each other about the correctness versus incorrectness of the suggested.
I didn't use any suggested logical order; I used implication upon the perceivable natural order.
b) ENTOMOL'OGY, noun [Gr. insect, to cut, discourse.] - "that part of zoology which treats of insects; the science or history and description of insects".
c) aut; form autos (self) represents form (growth) within flow (loss); hence the potential for increase + nature doesn't suggest information; so every -ism implies being suggested by the choice of others.
d) can neither/nor exist within an if/then system? How?
The root of all perceivable meaning originates from the natural order; hence being moved forwards; therefore bringing life towards death. All suggested meaning tempts one to ignore the perceived meaning; hence reaching death quicker.
Another example of reasoning...believer (JC) vs non-believer (fucking)...deliberately put together as a contradiction to both sides; which represents talmudic reasoning.
What if "word salad" represents the justification for lack of comprehending perceived meaning (sound); while reasoning about suggested meaning (words)?
DRESS, verb - "to adjust; to put in good order; to arrange in a line". Are you suggesting that psychedelic medication should be used to adjust the behavior of others? Wouldn't that cause development disabilities and why is it that the so called jews who push psychoanalysis are also pushing psychedelic medication as treatments?
Why are the many bombarded with suggested surveillance charts about exponentially increasing sicknesses and where are the surveillance charts for healthy growth?
No. Everything you have said here is wrong.
a) how does nature communicate a "no" state?
b) how could perceivable be wrong; when it requires the perceiving to make the choice to suggest that something perceivable is "right" or "wrong"?
c) if choice represents a response ability; then how could it define what something "is" without ignoring that the definable already "was" before?
d) why do you self restrict being "questionable" by trying to shut down the questions of others with reasoning (yes vs no; right vs wrong; want vs not want etc.)?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpuRcmPnSTM
Why don't you post the whole scene; where the jew uses allegory to describe the behavior of the gentiles; while manipulating them with basic cues to consent to whatever he suggested?
The accusation afterwards isn't against Billy Madison; but a suggested justification for the crowd to ignore what just happened.