ohh man, sometimes I love this site! I enjoy how the angry left shows up bitching and moaning how the site does them wrong, they cannot seem to get any headway with the leftist rhetoric.
hahaha, by the way you angry leftist, there is no such thing as far right. because those are leftists too :)
heh, was hitler far right? or far left? what about stalin? where does nazism land?
well, in this case you can only declare far right if when you hold them apart as far as you can you exceed say 6'8" otherwise, its just normal right handed.
It's called "left hand retard" and we all suffer from it. (Except those lefty freaks)
Socialists are left. Communists tend to be the right. But it's a touchy subject. Because communists are left, and nazis right. This is a concept and not entirely the reality.
Although Liberals tend to be the biggest fascists on the planet. Because fringe minorities, enforce laws on the majority, tending to cause even worse dystopia as a result. Almost every innovation from liberals has caused sweeping changes, and even more repression. Today they've become fascists. Adding troons to such an extent they suppress women. Huge reforms on the internet, providing nothing but dystopia, until there's a ministry of truth. Every climate proposal. Every woke agenda. Demanding guns be taken away. They never address the problem, they're indeed the cause and effect. But then where would their solutions be?
Liberals are almost always socialists. But they lack any sense of nationalism unless they brutally restrict it. Akin to fascists. But not those WW2 nazis, suppressing minorities. They've simply reversed the concept to hide their crimes. Programming causing you to be the nazi for not buying their bullshit they've fascistly adopted. It was almost always never voted on either. It simply assumed the majority to suppress it.
Neither are right or wrong. There's simply balanced to be maintained. It isn't what is occurring when the ideological swing has gone so far over to specific sides, suppressing the majority as a result. Until freedom has been replaced by dystopia.
This is not exactly true, communists and socialists are both the same, they are both leftist. nazi are left, even when we have been for years trying to brainwash people into thinking they are far right, they are not, they are left. (thus the joke on if you are far right you are left)
Fascism is the center of all that is left, it embodies the whole ideal set.
The rest of what you said is pretty spot on.
No, it depends on the communists. There are several. There are hippies in a commune, Jews in a kibbutz. There are dumb Marxists and ideologists. Or supposed people's revolutions. These have largely beem from coup and its people seizing military control. Later called the peoples party or whatever.
I did this debate before on here. Controversial. Probably get disagreement. But aren't military communists, they serve the state and guard it. They rank not from democracy but from experience, skill, training. They have their own laws and courts and police. They have their own jobs, and military complex, and their own ideology. They communally live on bases. Capitalism pays and deploys military, it defends democracy. It is not fascist, you can leave, and be discharged, tried and executed, it is not a democracy you don't vote. It is not a dictatorship, but monarchy can command it. The army are right-wing despite democracy regulating them. They can become fascists, or dictatorships, on assuming power over the state. What are they? Capitalists, no, that's mercenaries. The state pays them rather equally, housing, training, and fielding them likewise. If not communist, dictatorship. But they're not a dictatorship. Classify them? Socialist, no, not the entire state serves. Nationalists undoubtedly. But ultimately communist? Or suggest otherwise.
In any case those communists are right wing. While other Marxists aren't.
Nazis are technically left, because they were socialists. Changed today into globalisation. Or social systems, and technology away from nationalism, nationalisation. The left are innately fascist. Worse today.
Well, I think the granularity you are choosing in itself is misleading you a bit.
Starting with a clear understanding that we place the division of two groups as a mental tool to understand because the desire to be lead vs choosing your own way is consistent across humans.
So we devised 'left and right' as a concept of one thought on each side of someone who has no significant input on the matter.
This is rooted in the claim that the left wants governance and the right wants personal freedom.
So, just because someone says it is left or right, means little, you need to look into what the actions define it to be. In the event of fascism, communism, technocracy and even democracy the outcome is the same.
Based on this system of control and manipulation we can find all the people on the left demanding government take control.
So, is someone who lives in a community a leftist because they accept infrastructure and a life system as is devised by the community/country around them?
Each component of the system has come from socialist ideals.
Yawn. Socialism is globohomoism. There is no community today. It has inserted strangers everywhere causing mass consumption. The few communities remaining are under assault by socialism destroying them. It inserts more consumption and services destroying the community, filling it with a bunch of leftists burning the Bible, stopping fox hunting, making little troons, women football teams, you name it. Community today is going to a foreign football match. Rurally it is under assault by mass immigration. As another estate of tenements fills with strangers. The remaining community traditions left have become unaffordable, and non profitable, eventually threatened by regulations stopping them.
Socialism is globohomoism and the only community and tradition it wants are through services it controls, as it adds greater numbers destroying communities. The TV destroyed communities, the computer has destroyed far more. There hasn't been a single socialist innovation that hasn't achieved anything but dystopia. The left want more bullshit, because all they're is puppets. Take this climate shit. Innovations empowering wealth to control them far more, causing them to be literal slaves. Look at the online communities created. Are you nuts?
But I am sure you can find a little support group in Timbuktu causing you to travel outside of your community and spend far more going to another. Needed to travel to Timbuktu to find the karma, no, just rape. Globohomoism is socialism.
heh Epic rant Ep0ch
Yep, well sure thing, but does not change the statement that all our systems are rooted in it.
“Left” and “Right” mean absolutely nothing. Did you know that “flammable” and “inflammable” Mean the exact fucking thing?
What I’m concerned with is: Independent vs interdependent Authoritarian vs voluntarism Free speech vs censorship Bully vs Bullied Legal vs illegal...
The constitution is not a “living document.” It’s pretty clear. There should be no federal laws not written in the constitution and what is not in the constitution should be left up to the state.
Ever wonder why there were amendments for alcohol prohibition and revoking prohibition—- But not for any other drug prohibitions? Why before that time, there were not many federal laws or US codes outside the ‘territories’ not yet admitted as states?
Because around 1914-1934 the US government was captured by mega-rich fascists. You can be a right wing fascist or a left wing fascist, it doesn’t matter. The US became a corporation merged with and acting through the state. In this case—-eventually 50 of them, 6 territories, untold puppet states, and the entire global financial system a la SWIFT, petrodollar, and world reserve currency.
While I appreciate the intent, the reality is that you have been victimized by the abuse of simple clear understanding in the form of word manipulation and misuse.
You need to recognize when this happens and reject it. So, for example the left wants a system of governance to manage all. The right wants independent freedom and personal rights.
Walking this path you cannot deny that the entire fascism/communism/corporatism/global governance/... all belongs to the left.
A great deal of effort has been applied for many generations to obfuscate an understanding but essentially the desire to control everyone and everything belongs to one side of the spectrum, not both.
I know that, and you know that— But language is a virus, and ideas must adapt to survive.
The left/right paradigm is a means of brutal mind control. Fake opposition to itself to perpetuate itself. It is magickal faggetry.
The word “gay” in the Flintstones theme song... that definition is anachronistic. Over. Kaput.
There is no hope or purpose in explaining right/left anymore, it must be done away with entirely.
So maybe this, “police state government” or “non-police state government” 😅