Why did the police stand down for 40 minutes to an hour while the killer rampaged inside the school?
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (10)
sorted by:
Video of cops outside the school holding the parents back while killer is inside: https://twitter.com/paleofuture/status/15297084349956
That got 86'd rather quick.
Twitter removed it. Says page doesn't exist. Why, twatter, why?
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1529652093354536961.html
Archive: https://archive.ph/R2VZC
The cops were detaining parents who had raced over to go in and save their children. Meanwhile it is reported that cops went in to save their own children.
Whatever the reason was, it wasn't for the benefit for the children inside.
Law enforcement has no legal duty to save anyone. It's been proven in court. Same thing has happened before.
When the government, and those aligned with it tell you you don't need guns, these are the people they say will protect you instead. The right to defend yourself is one of the most fundamental rights, because not only does it ensure your other rights, but because you can't trust other's to care about protecting you as much as you yourself.
To protect the bypassers?
I think if you look at the political effects of this incident, it becomes far clearer.
They were told to stand down so that more kids would die. There is no other fathomable reason why cops wouldn't intervene in a situation like this.
If more kids die, they can call for stripping the population of their guns (as they are now doing) If the population loses their guns, they are fair game for increased state oppression, which all signals point to that being the plan. By 2030, you will own nothing. A hell of a lot easier to enact if they have guns and you don't.
Does this really need spelling out so?
If you owned guns, well, that would be something, not nothing.