I think I’ve figured something out I’d like to share. If there’s one thing I’ve noticed it’s how the Bolsheviks/Communists/Leftists/“them” prefer to operate. They much prefer to use silent weapons. They would rather fight quiet wars. It’s very similar to what JFK said and I think he too was fighting the same forces - “ For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day.”
They operate by covert means. Instead of bringing an army to fight, they’d much rather open the floodgates and bring in immigrants to destroy the sovereignty of a society they hate. They use other people to fight their wars. How do they do this? Through manipulation and blackmail. Their power lies purely in their covert means. I know I keep saying that but it can’t be overstated. Covert. Covert. Covert.Manipulation. Blackmail. Subversion. Infiltration. Their subversive nature makes them good at propaganda. As we know they control all the mainstream means of propaganda today. This has allowed them an insane amount of control over the populace. Whether it be the movies and tv people watch or controlling an algorithm on Google. It could be Controlling your feed on Facebook assuming you still use it. It allows them the power to censor. Censorship. There’s another word to add to the library. All their means of fighting wars is based on deception. There’s another one. What does deception mean? To hide the truth. They are people who are anti truth. Everything I’m saying can be tied back to these people being anti the truth. The subtle queues they put in their shows to make you believe a certain thing? Not the truth. The pornography they create? It’s not real. It’s not true. It’s fake. Censorship? It’s meant to hide or conceal the truth. When they deceive you into going to fight a war for their own gain, not yours it means they caused you to believe something that isn’t true in order to gain an advantage from doing so. They use subversion to undermine the authority of management or system put in place. So they do that by subverting the FBI, for instance. We grew up believing the FBI did the greater good and kept us safe. By subverting that institution, they’ve made our belief in that institution a lie. By subverting our democratic process of voting, they’ve made our belief in it a lie. By Subverting our institutions of higher learning, they’ve made our children believe lies. Does it all start to ring a bell? By Blackmailing a politician, they essentially make said politician lie. He may want to vote one way but he is then blackmailed to vote another way. His or her vote was a lie.
By turning a man into a woman, they are making that person believe a lie. They even take it a step further: they are making society lie to that person. Many of those people are pressured into lying to themselves since deep down they know it’s a man. Communism keeps people in line by making people lie to oneself.
Does it make sense how they exert control? It’s all one form of a lie or another. So that brings up the question: how do we fight it? We fight it by telling the truth. Truth shines a light on their darkness. Like touching an electric eel, they must react. Because it’s painful to them. But there’s more. The way to beat them is not at their own game. No, we don’t stoop to that level. We cannot wallow in shit with the pigs for then we become a pig. We beat them our way. Through overt means. Armies by day. We’re not going to win in the courts. We’re not going to win in the ballot boxes. The only one to shut down the propaganda wings is by physically removing them. With force. The only way to have a healthy election again is to remove the parasite - by force. If it’s still there, to do the same thing over and over again is madness. How do you deal with someone who tries to intimidate you? You sock them in the mouth. What do you with someone who infiltrates your group? You physically remove them. What do you do when someone censors you and prevents you from speaking? Exactly. You know the answer. They are creatures of the dark. The way to beat them is by fighting them in the light. They cannot win that way. So long as we refuse to do that, the darkness will only continue to increase and one day it will consume us.
The battleground is ultimately each individual consciousness, and we must always remember that.
Trump still gets criticized for not "draining the swamp". Could he have pursued and imprisoned some of the swamp creatures? Almost certainly. The lesser problem was that numerous others would gladly take their places, but there's a far bigger problem.
Had he done that, a large fraction of the population would have believed, without doubt, that a tyrant was beginning a wave of oppression leading to a murderous purge. They would have been told that night and day. Eventually, blood would have been spilled. Innocent blood, aside from being victims of an unrelenting psychological attack. Who knows what might have been unleashed.
Fast-forward a little over a year, and I daresay that far more people would go along with trials for corruption and treason for the likes of Biden and Pelosi. This would have been unthinkable a couple of years ago.
As hard evidence, look at what has happened with the hottest of hot-button issues: the overturning of Roe v. Wade. A couple of days of overheated twittering and then everyone goes back to their lives. The liberals have clearly blown their load on this. And after BLM and burned cities, no one wants riots over anyone's outrage either.
And the difference is in consciousness: a strong majority no longer believes that the leaders advocating such things are actually fighting for their rights. After COVID, they have seen that these liberals do not give a rat's ass about the rights of the people.
The vast majority of the Hell we are living in has been created people that think they're following the law, doing the right thing, being a model citizen, whatever. They are "one of the good guys", as far as they know.
Everyone is free to deal with this as they see fit, but if you ask me, it's quite problematic. And if God is watching what you do, I don't think you get to use the excuse, "I didn't know any better," especially if you haven't extended that grace to other people.
You basically said it, might as well post a link
"Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars" https://www.syti.net/GB/SilentWeaponsGB.html
Yep.
Sadly, this is the reality we are in the system churning away, imagine the soul in a cave thousands of years ago, oppressed by the leadership forced to maintain existence in the shitty pattern in use.
Pretty much that, here we have this system of ownership defined in the past carried to the future defining the scale and direction and momentum, fortified by generations of thinkers submitting thoughts to the vast collective of ownership.
Consider the time in the cave spent under a single derivative of leadership the formation of the sick incest monarchies that defined humanity for so long.
Momentum (balance within motion) has no past; present or future, only the ever changing moment(um) of motion. The ignorance of that allows the parasitic few to suggest past; presents and future as definitions to the consenting many.
The only direction for life represents being moved from inception towards death. Motion represents direction; and the momentum of motion represents the perceivable balance for the responding choice formed (life) within flow (inception towards death).
Form within flow aka choice within balance represents being a differentiated reactor within the same generation. Thinking implies reacting to input; hence impression (perception) to compression (comprehension) for expression (growth) or regression (loss).
HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] implies being defined by AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.] aka formed (human) by animation (animal). The parasitic few suggest words (human animal) to tempt the many to ignore perceived (being animated form within animating flow).
Evil lurks in every man's heart
HEART, noun [Latin cor, cordis, motion, pulsation.] represents adaptation to being moved; hence as perceiving to perceivable.
Evil implies versus Good aka a rebranded conflict of reason (want vs not want); caused by consenting to either want or not want a suggestion; while ignoring perceived.
Temporary life (form) grows within the ongoing loss of being moved from inception towards death (flow). In other words...resistance (form) grows within the temptation of loss (flow). This isn't a conflict of good vs evil; but a choice within the balance of need (resistance) or want (temptation to ignore need).
Furthermore; lurking (out of sight) represents the consequences of consenting to suggested (information) over perceived (inspiration); hence the temptation of ignorance causing the lack of comprehension towards perceived. Those who choose to ignore perceived are lurking within suggested.
I name the Jew every day. It is a tragedy I didn’t explicitly name them in this post though.
The big lie is actually this: "you do you" . You can find this in almost every show or leftist political ideology. It's also the primary rule for Satanism.
It's so subtle and pervasive but it undermines the bedrock of liberty and freedom. Setting constraints in our behavior allows us to mediate conflict and to therefore create a more prosperous future. God's law is intended to protect us and enable us to achieve peak potential. Jesus came to set us free from the bondage caused by universal selfishness. John 10:10. The spiritual component of all this is very real.
All is in the open for those with eyes to see aka them utilizing perceivable inspiration underneath suggested information. The narrative suggested by the few represents the perceived narration ignored by the many.
Suggested information infiltrates memory when consented; while suggested invasions represent a conflict narrative (imbalance) as to obfuscate the choice made underneath within a balance based system.
Before one votes to elect; one consents by free will of choice to the suggestion of "voting" by the free will of choice by others. That represents a) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; b) submission of choice to choice and c) shirking of response-ability (as choice within perceivable balance).
All intimidation represent suggestions aiming at getting consent by free will of choice aka either to want or to not want to be intimidated; which both ignore need (perceived) for want (suggested).
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death); each represents ONE within ALL, and ALL (flow/form aka loss/growth) represents ONE in energy (internal power).
The differentiation of audio (flow) into mono (form) happens inside energy; hence each ONE perceiving (mono) existing within ALL perceivable (audio). The parasitic few are intimidating the ignorant many with a suggested one world system as to deceive them to keep ignoring the perceived one world system.
"Killing in the name of"..."those who die are justified"..."And now you do what they told ya, now you're under control"..."Fuck you, I won't do what you tell me"
That ain't covert; that's chutzpah; that's letting the ignorant goyim celebrate their own self destruction; while idolizing those who suggest them to destroy themselves.
Secrecy originates in the want for suggested information; which in return allows those suggesting information to keep it secret.
Manipulation based on consent to suggestion.
Blackmail based on ones choice of want (suggestion) over need (perception) beforehand; hence shaping the host weakness for the parasitic exploitation with blackmail.
Subversion based on consenting to let other shape the perceived reality with suggested fiction.
Infiltration into ones mind (memory) through the suggested information by others; hence becoming a golem aka a monster out of clay; controllable from the outside.
What are the few propagating? The temptation to ignore need (perceived) for want (suggested); hence being happy merchants of temptation; yet that's impotent if resisted. Suggestion of porn made potent by consent to jerking off to porn aka self destruction by choice of want over need.
Nature doesn't require propaganda; it communicates everything perceivable at any moment to each ones perception within. Nonstop narration to inspire adaptation...unless ignored.
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death); it's flow that represents the main stream that communicates all perceivable inspiration. Ignoring this for the suggested mainstream narrative by the parasitic few gives them control over you.
"insane person" represents a suggested information by the few; for which the many ignore to be "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka within; by; out of and in response to the perceivable origin of sound.
The few control what the many consent to ignore; which the few gain by suggesting the many to ignore perceived.
The "ship" represents allegory for ONE vessel (form) within ALL motion (flow). Censorship; ownership; leadership; citizenship etc. use the same allegory as the sleight of hand; notice of liability; reveal of method for all with eyes to see. Same with all the water allegories within banking (river banks).
Truth implies versus Lies; a conflict; an imbalance. Truth vs false represents a) the rebranding of want vs not want; b) the conflict of reason as division by suggestion, and c) ignorance of being choice at the center of perceivable balance (need/want); hence being deceived to ignore need (perceived) for want (suggested); which then puts one into the conflict of reason (want vs not want); which gives the parasitic few the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism), and contradict (talmudic reasoning) everything the many consent to reason about. This is how the few control both sides of every conflict the many consent to have among themselves.
These conflicts of reason can then be rebranded at will into for example...true vs false; good vs bad; believing vs not believing; capitalism vs communism; nationalism vs internationalism; us vs them; feminism vs patriarchy; McDonalds vs Burger King; Pepsi vs Coke; Trump vs Biden; left-wing vs right-wing; Nintendo vs Sony; hot vs not; upvote vs downvote; smartphone vs brickphone and so on.
Choice represents the reaction to enacted balance (need/want), and needs to resist the temptation of suggested imbalance (want vs not want) by the choices of others.
Nature doesn't lie; nor does it communicate any truth...it moves everything; which those within perceived as inspiration for adaptation to being moved; which represents self sustenance as form (life) within flow (inception towards death). Your consent (want) to suggested truth is what allows the few to contradict it with suggested lies (not want); meanwhile you ignore perceived change (need) and it's that weakness of ignorance that causes the parasitic exploitation.
Beating them represents the us (want) vs them (not want) conflict of reason; caused by your consent to suggested fiction over perceived reality. Perception represents the overt means of communication; while suggestion causes the self inflicted overt means of lacking to comprehend perceived.
a) form within flow represents force of temporary resistance within force of ongoing velocity. Ignoring to resist for attacking others represents going with the velocity from inception towards death; instead of resisting it for the sustenance of life.
b) consider getting the boys ready to go into the woods to remove the parasitic ticks by force...will that stop ticks reacting parasitic to your host weakness of ignoring the perceived threats? Does removing the parasitic behavior of the porn-jew address the host weakness of willingly self sacrificing the seed of life for the temptation of lust?
c) what if ALL represents ONE in energy; hence suggested "removing" not representing getting rid of something; but perceivable RE (responding to) MOVING (being moved)?
a) suggested creationism (out of nothing) ignores perceived transmutation (out of everything). One cannot perceived creation; only the reshaping of already perceivable.
b) the light vs dark allegory represents growing comprehension of perceived (light) or ignoring it for suggested (dark) aka enlightenment (light) or ignorance (dark).
Sleigh of hand: "exit light" (exit comprehension) "enter night" (enter ignorance) "take my hand" (consent to my suggestion) "we-re off to never-neverland" (ignored growth of life).
Yawn the one who holds the gold sets the terms of trade and further meddles them. Nothing more nothing less. They all want the gold, and because they do it favours and fancies for even more influence. If all you're buying is gold with your what not. It can simply buy or sell to another what if, playing y'all off. Does it get any deeper. Nope. Greed rues the day like every other. I am sure it exploits even further. Not much.