The idea I'm attempting to propose is that this is now becoming you don't have a choice for your body.
The idea of my body my choice was nice but then why did you have sex?
We can slowly see the conundrum.
I do believe in my body my choice. Sex can result in grossness from a humanbeing like bacteria and other grossness.
I want to know at this point how much the government should have control over your actions or your body. I do think to some certain extent it should but, if my government is corrupt, I have no ability to correct it other then "voting". I could take the violence route but I am getting monitored for that.
I am wondering why roe v wade right now. Specifically after the whole covid fiasco.
Though it feels nice to rub in the faces of those who believed in "my body my choice
I however think there is malicious ideas behind it.
I'd propose the idea that we preach equality for different people. This idea has worked well for me recently based off of one experiment. The word equality gets their emotions going.
How do you feel about abortions in case of rape or medical issues?
How do you feel about infant dismemberment ?
Pretty bad.
So, can you answer the question?
I will not blindly validate abortion in cases of rape or medical issues. As per my question, abortion violently dismembers a human being simply because of the sins of another human being. Abortion goes against the natural instinct of motherhood, and continuation of humanity, and as such it is evil.
That being said, abortion is an issue that highlights the pitfalls and errors of societal structure. I can think of few other questions that bring light to the problems of society structure than abortion.
So you want to make the decision about whether or not a woman can have an abortion?
Or who should be able to make that ecision?
92% of abortions are elective. 7% are for economic reasons. 99% are not medically necessary nor related to rape.
That does not answer my question.
Your question is attempting to create a false equivalence and therefore should be dismissed
It definitely has on the matter of percentages.
Let me ask you. Should women be equal to men?
If that were the case then. Shouldn't we be able to discuss on how we conduct our behaviors?
What do you mean? When it comes to rights? Of course.
I suppose, if you kill a baby that was the product of rape, you'd have two victims instead of one
So, what is the verdict then? Forbid it?
Is it an acceptable trade-off that an innocent human being dies due to the possible mental health issues of a woman burdened with the child of rape that she need not even raise? One is a temporary issue, the mental health, while the death of the child is permanent. Think of it as the "suicide is the permanent solution to a temporary problem" calculus. So yes, abortion in cases of rape should be against the law.
Note, in good faith, this presumes that it's not "regret rape" and that the woman doesn't take a morning after pill, which would make it worse to kill a baby.
The tricky moral issues are things like women who find out they have cancer while pregnant, or an ectopic pregnancy that may kill her.
My title was that I don't always believe in abortion. I do think they can be considered just in those certain circumstances.
Do you believe that the government should regulate abortions?
Depends on why and how long the term of delivery date is.
What are your ideas regarding this?
Tell me first who should be authorized to make the decision if a woman can have an abortion.
have to be outlawed too or women will make fake rape accusations