It's surreal now how they'll play every side of any issue, no matter how contradictory it may seem.
The out on this one is easy: "And historically government has served to protect and defend those rights, by establishing, defining and limiting them." Gotcha!
I have special sunglasses. When I wear them I look at Biden and I see a skullfaced demon. Also when I look at the leftist abortion rioters. By the way, what's with all the ads on CNN and Facebook and Twitter that all say "Breed. Obey. Sleep."? That's so weird. Cough.
I actually agree. The original Roe v. Wade decision interpreted the constitution so incredibly broadly, as to say that rights not explicitly laid out in the constitution, were still guaranteed by the constitution. I support this type of broad interpretation of the constitution.
The problem is that those same justices refused to ever apply this broad interpretation to anything else besides killing babies, even to rights that are explicitly written, like the second amendment. It's clear that the Roe v. Wade decision was an attempt to legislate from the bench, rather than applying a consistent interpretation of the constitution.
My personal interpretation of the constitution is that "freedom of religion" should apply to damn near everything. I believe that "religion" shouldn't just be viewed as spirituality in this context, but rather the entire way you live your life, which, historically, was guided entirely by spirituality.
The courts, at times, seem to agree with my interpretation, but they never allow it to be applied. They'll say that freedom of religion does not only apply to organized religions and that deeply held individual beliefs are protected, but then they'll throw in a line like "unless there is a compelling governmental interest" (literally verbatim, btw, that's not just me making shit up, there is a lot of rulings that say that exactly), that essentially makes the whole amendment null and void.
I believe that the first amendment should prevent the government from forcing you to do anything. The government should only have the authority to prevent you from doing certain things which impact others directly. That is, even if you argue that me not wearing a mask will hurt you, you cannot force me to live against my natural state by donning one. But if you argue that me coughing on you will hurt you, then a law preventing that action that could be fair game.
As far as abortion goes it isn't a choice, it's an excuse. A choice is taking contraception. An excuse is using medicine to terminate something inside of you.
Who has it suppressed. It has often suppressed the national population, populating. Instead it now relies on increasing immigration to fill the dropping birthrates. In turn inflation increases. Less home ownership. More rentals. Causing higher prices. It promotes infidelity, where matrimony lasts less. More careers aren't created by it. A myth. Often quite the opposite, less are. It has a much more severe hidden run off.
It's not much of a choice. But whatever is. It's an excuse. Who really cares what excuse is used. There's no perfect World. There's only ignorance. In a perfect World why would they. In today's World why don't they. It becomes a question for somebody else. Or an excuse for another.
The question becomes, do women go to abortion rallies to get pregnant? I could never figure it out. Doesn't everybody else go to a hospital to abort? But the rights or something. Come back when your pregnant.
It's surreal now how they'll play every side of any issue, no matter how contradictory it may seem.
The out on this one is easy: "And historically government has served to protect and defend those rights, by establishing, defining and limiting them." Gotcha!
I have special sunglasses. When I wear them I look at Biden and I see a skullfaced demon. Also when I look at the leftist abortion rioters. By the way, what's with all the ads on CNN and Facebook and Twitter that all say "Breed. Obey. Sleep."? That's so weird. Cough.
I actually agree. The original Roe v. Wade decision interpreted the constitution so incredibly broadly, as to say that rights not explicitly laid out in the constitution, were still guaranteed by the constitution. I support this type of broad interpretation of the constitution.
The problem is that those same justices refused to ever apply this broad interpretation to anything else besides killing babies, even to rights that are explicitly written, like the second amendment. It's clear that the Roe v. Wade decision was an attempt to legislate from the bench, rather than applying a consistent interpretation of the constitution.
My personal interpretation of the constitution is that "freedom of religion" should apply to damn near everything. I believe that "religion" shouldn't just be viewed as spirituality in this context, but rather the entire way you live your life, which, historically, was guided entirely by spirituality.
The courts, at times, seem to agree with my interpretation, but they never allow it to be applied. They'll say that freedom of religion does not only apply to organized religions and that deeply held individual beliefs are protected, but then they'll throw in a line like "unless there is a compelling governmental interest" (literally verbatim, btw, that's not just me making shit up, there is a lot of rulings that say that exactly), that essentially makes the whole amendment null and void.
I believe that the first amendment should prevent the government from forcing you to do anything. The government should only have the authority to prevent you from doing certain things which impact others directly. That is, even if you argue that me not wearing a mask will hurt you, you cannot force me to live against my natural state by donning one. But if you argue that me coughing on you will hurt you, then a law preventing that action that could be fair game.
"devout Catholic"
Nobody should being pay taxes then.
As far as abortion goes it isn't a choice, it's an excuse. A choice is taking contraception. An excuse is using medicine to terminate something inside of you.
Who has it suppressed. It has often suppressed the national population, populating. Instead it now relies on increasing immigration to fill the dropping birthrates. In turn inflation increases. Less home ownership. More rentals. Causing higher prices. It promotes infidelity, where matrimony lasts less. More careers aren't created by it. A myth. Often quite the opposite, less are. It has a much more severe hidden run off.
It's not much of a choice. But whatever is. It's an excuse. Who really cares what excuse is used. There's no perfect World. There's only ignorance. In a perfect World why would they. In today's World why don't they. It becomes a question for somebody else. Or an excuse for another.
The question becomes, do women go to abortion rallies to get pregnant? I could never figure it out. Doesn't everybody else go to a hospital to abort? But the rights or something. Come back when your pregnant.
if you die before the next election you might vote for him lmao