Thread: 97% of Pfizer's vax "trial" patients were fake
(twitter.com)
Comments (12)
sorted by:
There's only 6 files but supposedly 181 participants for site 1006. Hence OP claim of 97% data made up or missing.
after reading the entire twitter thread its replies and the comments in this thread it is safe to conclude that nobody but the person that posted this data has any idea what the actual fuck is going on with the data lmao
I'm not quite following. Can you explain this to me like I am five?
What the OP is saying is that they always 1 file per patient per week per site. So, we should expect 181 files for May 2nd for site 1006 if, within their data, they claim to have 181 patients in the trial. Instead, they have just 6 which is a 97% reduction.
Could it be that they were 'excluded' from the study due to ....death, infection, or extraneous data point?
I got the sense that they frequently culled the patients during the study to ensure that the numbers were good.....
Yeah it could be attrition but even then that's substantial attrition which indicates as you state something ominous
Twitter OP is saying that a court order compelled a release of all files concerning patients in the vaccine trials. Of all the patients recruited at these testing sites, case files were released for only 3.9% of patients. This leads to the inference that the other 96.1% of patients do not have case files and thus were fake.
At least, that’s what I take from the thread. I’m not familiar with this litigation or whether Twitter OP is making reliable claims. Axo can correct me if this is wrong.
If I'm understanding (and it's very possible I'm not) that Pfizer claimed their testing included 44,000 patients. That means there were 44,000 patients selected for the trial, as evidenced by the sequentially numbered patients. But there aren't 44,000 patients worth of test result documentation that has been submitted.
I’m having similar confusion, I am super ready to believe they did this, but I’m too slow to connect the dots as they’ve been presented.
Here is my hypothesis....inflate the numbers so the %%% of vax sides is lessened. Because a much larger dilluted control group?
I don’t care about your hypothesis I care how they’re fudging the numbers. It’s very obvious why inflated sample size numbers would be beneficial but catching them doing it is very significant and important.