I think the whole point of illustrating the shipping constraints, farmland acquisitions, destruction of production, etc is to show evidence that they're attempting to coordinate action with an intended outcome. The more we all are aware of this, the more resiliency we can create by preparing and defending.
Conspiracy/alt-news forums are an attempt to crowdsource truth without complete information, so it should be a cooperative effort where people add what ideas or facts they can to build the best working theory. The good information ought to rise to the top and the bad information will fall out of favor over time.
Things to watch out for:
-When people promote fear they're usually selling something.
-People who start controversy over a topic rather than contributing their viewpoint aren't worth listening to. If you find a particular topic to be unworthy of discussion just downvote it and move on rather than trying to derail it.
-People who repeatedly accuse others of being a fed without contributing to a topic aren't worth listening to.
Agreement (want) implies versus disagreement (not want); both representing consent to suggested (fiction) over perceived (reality).
Consider your choice to either agree or disagree with the perceived need of hunger...does hunger require your consent or do you need to adapt no matter what you want or not want to choose?
truth without complete information
a) truth implies vs false; hence yet another rebranded want vs not want conflict of reason; caused by consent to the suggested information by others (want); while ignoring perceived inspiration (need).
b) as form (life) within flow (inception towards death); as choice within balance; as perceiving within perceivable; as temporary within ongoing; as resistance within velocity; as potential within potentiality; as ONE within ALL...why do you want completion; when you represent the need to grow the incomplete aka yourself?
c) Why do you choose to ignore perceived "being within" for suggested "without"?
it should be a cooperative effort
a) EF'FORT, noun [Latin fortis - "force".]...flow represents the objectifying force (velocity); while form represents the subjected force (resistance). What does resisting imply? By free will of choice as ONE (choice of evaluation) within ALL (perceivable value within balance).
b) COOP, noun [Latin; hollowness; containing, holding] -ATION (within action); so cooperation represents allegory for being form (reaction) within flow (action).
c) the parasitic few suggest the many to want to unite; while they ignore U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness". ONEs choice expresses ALL natural order incoming; which one ignores when following the suggested orders by others.
The good information ought to rise to the top and the bad information will fall out of favor over time.
The "over time" implies the momentum (balance) of ongoing motion (tick; tick; tick...) aka the ever changing moment ones choice needs to adapt to; which is what one ignores when choosing to want (good information) vs not want (bad information) suggestions by others.
All suggested information will "fall out" (actually transmute back into base aka form to flow); while the ongoing "time" represents the ongoing perceivable inspiration offered. Anyone can grow anything at any moment out of all perceivable inspiration...unless ignored for suggested information, out of which the continuously build the Tower of BA'BEL, noun [Heb.] - "confusion; disorder" and what remains once the tower of suggested information collapses yet again? The foundation of perceivable inspiration going on.
to build the best
Have a sleight of hand through the suggested idol "Joe Esposito":
"a man’s got learn to take it"..."try to believe while the going gets rough"..."history repeats itself, try and you’ll succeed".."never doubt that you’re the one"..."You’re the best around"..."nothing’s gonna ever keep you down"..."Fight to the end"..."your life will depend on the strength that you have inside you"..."gotta be proud"..."standing out in the crowd when the odds and the game defy you"..."try your best to win the moment"..."fight ‘til you drop"..."Never stop"..."Can’t give up"..."Until you reach the title"..."Fight!"..."you’re the best in town"
The entire song (interwoven with true and false information) represents suggested words; yet the last line "Listen to that sound" contradicts the whole song by pointing out perceived inspiration (sound) over suggested information (word).
The singer; the movie; the actors; the music...all suggested distractions to tempt the consenting many to keep ignoring the perceived reality for suggested fiction. Perceivable inspiration is always there for those with eyes to see aka those who resist the temptation of suggested information... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oomCIXGzsR0
There may be 35000 plants, but maybe only a handfull of them make something essential that gets used as an input at others. Fertilizer, food oils, maybe packaging
They don't need to set all food plants on fire. They don't need to set on fire even one. They need only "independent news article" about "food plant is on fire" to provide an excuse for their manufactured food shortages. That is how it works. They fabricate a reasons and then use them as an excuse for their real goal. If people began to ask questions, they will always have an excuse - "food plants are on fire", "it is Russia fault", "it is new virus", "it is economic crisis", "it is unvaxxed truck drivers", whatever.
It's just like in UK Utopia series - "we don't need a real epidemic, we just need an impression of epidemic to force the people to do anything".
It is just like 911 - fabricate terrorism, unsignificant, but very loud and then use it as an excuse for total surveillance and control.
It is just like coronahoax - create/simulate insignificant and harmless disease and blow out an awful "pandemic" to have an excuse for all shit they did and still do.
The same is with that "food plants fires".
As for Bill Gates and farm land, the question is not about "Bill Gates bought all US farmland". The question is what the fuck have that insane scammer, seller of worst OS ever and obsessed with questionable biological research freak have to do with any farming land? Even if he bought only 100 acres - it is a definitely a reason to pay some attention to that shit.
And all that exaggerating on that topics is just a food for all that fuckcheckers to silence anyone who could ask a reasonable questions on any sensitive topic that is not yet ready for use.
Just like "flat earth" shit is widely used to discredit any sane conspiracy theories.
Just ignore all that shit. You can't prevent its creation and could do nothing about using that by MSM to discredit you. If you care what MSM tell about you, then conspiracy theorism is definitely not your thing.
There are no serious conspiracy analysts any more.
Or at least not on this site.
All there is left is people being addicted to and sharing fearporn, making wild predictions to boost their ego (how many times will you predict the stock market crashing; eventually it will) and supporting click whores.
I have very little capacity (time and resources) to carry out research in conspiracies carried out, however i have the intellectual capacity to understand when i read a post by a conspiracy analyst or some joker.
I think the whole point of illustrating the shipping constraints, farmland acquisitions, destruction of production, etc is to show evidence that they're attempting to coordinate action with an intended outcome. The more we all are aware of this, the more resiliency we can create by preparing and defending.
I agree.
Conspiracy/alt-news forums are an attempt to crowdsource truth without complete information, so it should be a cooperative effort where people add what ideas or facts they can to build the best working theory. The good information ought to rise to the top and the bad information will fall out of favor over time.
Things to watch out for:
-When people promote fear they're usually selling something.
-People who start controversy over a topic rather than contributing their viewpoint aren't worth listening to. If you find a particular topic to be unworthy of discussion just downvote it and move on rather than trying to derail it.
-People who repeatedly accuse others of being a fed without contributing to a topic aren't worth listening to.
And this is the problem...
Most normies have confused conspiracy with alt news/ forums.
They do not understand that alt news/ forums are also part of the agenda
Agreement (want) implies versus disagreement (not want); both representing consent to suggested (fiction) over perceived (reality).
Consider your choice to either agree or disagree with the perceived need of hunger...does hunger require your consent or do you need to adapt no matter what you want or not want to choose?
a) truth implies vs false; hence yet another rebranded want vs not want conflict of reason; caused by consent to the suggested information by others (want); while ignoring perceived inspiration (need).
b) as form (life) within flow (inception towards death); as choice within balance; as perceiving within perceivable; as temporary within ongoing; as resistance within velocity; as potential within potentiality; as ONE within ALL...why do you want completion; when you represent the need to grow the incomplete aka yourself?
c) Why do you choose to ignore perceived "being within" for suggested "without"?
a) EF'FORT, noun [Latin fortis - "force".]...flow represents the objectifying force (velocity); while form represents the subjected force (resistance). What does resisting imply? By free will of choice as ONE (choice of evaluation) within ALL (perceivable value within balance).
b) COOP, noun [Latin; hollowness; containing, holding] -ATION (within action); so cooperation represents allegory for being form (reaction) within flow (action).
c) the parasitic few suggest the many to want to unite; while they ignore U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness". ONEs choice expresses ALL natural order incoming; which one ignores when following the suggested orders by others.
The "over time" implies the momentum (balance) of ongoing motion (tick; tick; tick...) aka the ever changing moment ones choice needs to adapt to; which is what one ignores when choosing to want (good information) vs not want (bad information) suggestions by others.
All suggested information will "fall out" (actually transmute back into base aka form to flow); while the ongoing "time" represents the ongoing perceivable inspiration offered. Anyone can grow anything at any moment out of all perceivable inspiration...unless ignored for suggested information, out of which the continuously build the Tower of BA'BEL, noun [Heb.] - "confusion; disorder" and what remains once the tower of suggested information collapses yet again? The foundation of perceivable inspiration going on.
Have a sleight of hand through the suggested idol "Joe Esposito":
"a man’s got learn to take it"..."try to believe while the going gets rough"..."history repeats itself, try and you’ll succeed".."never doubt that you’re the one"..."You’re the best around"..."nothing’s gonna ever keep you down"..."Fight to the end"..."your life will depend on the strength that you have inside you"..."gotta be proud"..."standing out in the crowd when the odds and the game defy you"..."try your best to win the moment"..."fight ‘til you drop"..."Never stop"..."Can’t give up"..."Until you reach the title"..."Fight!"..."you’re the best in town"
The entire song (interwoven with true and false information) represents suggested words; yet the last line "Listen to that sound" contradicts the whole song by pointing out perceived inspiration (sound) over suggested information (word).
The singer; the movie; the actors; the music...all suggested distractions to tempt the consenting many to keep ignoring the perceived reality for suggested fiction. Perceivable inspiration is always there for those with eyes to see aka those who resist the temptation of suggested information... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oomCIXGzsR0
Is that opinion based on anything but your feelz?
What makes you think so?
So it's a feeling you have?
That's not how it works.
They don't need to set all food plants on fire. They don't need to set on fire even one. They need only "independent news article" about "food plant is on fire" to provide an excuse for their manufactured food shortages. That is how it works. They fabricate a reasons and then use them as an excuse for their real goal. If people began to ask questions, they will always have an excuse - "food plants are on fire", "it is Russia fault", "it is new virus", "it is economic crisis", "it is unvaxxed truck drivers", whatever.
It's just like in UK Utopia series - "we don't need a real epidemic, we just need an impression of epidemic to force the people to do anything".
It is just like 911 - fabricate terrorism, unsignificant, but very loud and then use it as an excuse for total surveillance and control.
It is just like coronahoax - create/simulate insignificant and harmless disease and blow out an awful "pandemic" to have an excuse for all shit they did and still do.
The same is with that "food plants fires".
As for Bill Gates and farm land, the question is not about "Bill Gates bought all US farmland". The question is what the fuck have that insane scammer, seller of worst OS ever and obsessed with questionable biological research freak have to do with any farming land? Even if he bought only 100 acres - it is a definitely a reason to pay some attention to that shit.
And all that exaggerating on that topics is just a food for all that fuckcheckers to silence anyone who could ask a reasonable questions on any sensitive topic that is not yet ready for use.
Just like "flat earth" shit is widely used to discredit any sane conspiracy theories.
Just ignore all that shit. You can't prevent its creation and could do nothing about using that by MSM to discredit you. If you care what MSM tell about you, then conspiracy theorism is definitely not your thing.
Who has claimed that these fires are causing food shortages?
Hunger (perceived need); Food (suggested want). The more one adapts to the former; the more effective one can resist the temptation of the latter.
pssst. don't disrupt the outrage.
conspiracies like these are a big business so the grifters who make money off of riling up the dumb sheep will not take this kindly.
Indeed. What is real and what isn't?
Everything represents reality; fiction represents choosing suggested information (want) over perceived inspiration (need); hence RE'AL, adjective (Latin realis; from res (response) + Heb. - "a word").
Example...wind represents perceived reality; the word "wind" represents suggested fiction...which one do you choose to respond to?
There are no serious conspiracy analysts any more.
Or at least not on this site.
All there is left is people being addicted to and sharing fearporn, making wild predictions to boost their ego (how many times will you predict the stock market crashing; eventually it will) and supporting click whores.
"enjoying fearporn" represents the choice of want over need.
"supporting click whores" represents wanted confirmation over needed adaptation.
Yes
I have very little capacity (time and resources) to carry out research in conspiracies carried out, however i have the intellectual capacity to understand when i read a post by a conspiracy analyst or some joker.
Is that so. I disagree.