Agreement (want) implies versus disagreement (not want); both representing consent to suggested (fiction) over perceived (reality).
Consider your choice to either agree or disagree with the perceived need of hunger...does hunger require your consent or do you need to adapt no matter what you want or not want to choose?
truth without complete information
a) truth implies vs false; hence yet another rebranded want vs not want conflict of reason; caused by consent to the suggested information by others (want); while ignoring perceived inspiration (need).
b) as form (life) within flow (inception towards death); as choice within balance; as perceiving within perceivable; as temporary within ongoing; as resistance within velocity; as potential within potentiality; as ONE within ALL...why do you want completion; when you represent the need to grow the incomplete aka yourself?
c) Why do you choose to ignore perceived "being within" for suggested "without"?
it should be a cooperative effort
a) EF'FORT, noun [Latin fortis - "force".]...flow represents the objectifying force (velocity); while form represents the subjected force (resistance). What does resisting imply? By free will of choice as ONE (choice of evaluation) within ALL (perceivable value within balance).
b) COOP, noun [Latin; hollowness; containing, holding] -ATION (within action); so cooperation represents allegory for being form (reaction) within flow (action).
c) the parasitic few suggest the many to want to unite; while they ignore U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness". ONEs choice expresses ALL natural order incoming; which one ignores when following the suggested orders by others.
The good information ought to rise to the top and the bad information will fall out of favor over time.
The "over time" implies the momentum (balance) of ongoing motion (tick; tick; tick...) aka the ever changing moment ones choice needs to adapt to; which is what one ignores when choosing to want (good information) vs not want (bad information) suggestions by others.
All suggested information will "fall out" (actually transmute back into base aka form to flow); while the ongoing "time" represents the ongoing perceivable inspiration offered. Anyone can grow anything at any moment out of all perceivable inspiration...unless ignored for suggested information, out of which the continuously build the Tower of BA'BEL, noun [Heb.] - "confusion; disorder" and what remains once the tower of suggested information collapses yet again? The foundation of perceivable inspiration going on.
to build the best
Have a sleight of hand through the suggested idol "Joe Esposito":
"a man’s got learn to take it"..."try to believe while the going gets rough"..."history repeats itself, try and you’ll succeed".."never doubt that you’re the one"..."You’re the best around"..."nothing’s gonna ever keep you down"..."Fight to the end"..."your life will depend on the strength that you have inside you"..."gotta be proud"..."standing out in the crowd when the odds and the game defy you"..."try your best to win the moment"..."fight ‘til you drop"..."Never stop"..."Can’t give up"..."Until you reach the title"..."Fight!"..."you’re the best in town"
The entire song (interwoven with true and false information) represents suggested words; yet the last line "Listen to that sound" contradicts the whole song by pointing out perceived inspiration (sound) over suggested information (word).
The singer; the movie; the actors; the music...all suggested distractions to tempt the consenting many to keep ignoring the perceived reality for suggested fiction. Perceivable inspiration is always there for those with eyes to see aka those who resist the temptation of suggested information... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oomCIXGzsR0
Agreement (want) implies versus disagreement (not want); both representing consent to suggested (fiction) over perceived (reality).
Consider your choice to either agree or disagree with the perceived need of hunger...does hunger require your consent or do you need to adapt no matter what you want or not want to choose?
a) truth implies vs false; hence yet another rebranded want vs not want conflict of reason; caused by consent to the suggested information by others (want); while ignoring perceived inspiration (need).
b) as form (life) within flow (inception towards death); as choice within balance; as perceiving within perceivable; as temporary within ongoing; as resistance within velocity; as potential within potentiality; as ONE within ALL...why do you want completion; when you represent the need to grow the incomplete aka yourself?
c) Why do you choose to ignore perceived "being within" for suggested "without"?
a) EF'FORT, noun [Latin fortis - "force".]...flow represents the objectifying force (velocity); while form represents the subjected force (resistance). What does resisting imply? By free will of choice as ONE (choice of evaluation) within ALL (perceivable value within balance).
b) COOP, noun [Latin; hollowness; containing, holding] -ATION (within action); so cooperation represents allegory for being form (reaction) within flow (action).
c) the parasitic few suggest the many to want to unite; while they ignore U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness". ONEs choice expresses ALL natural order incoming; which one ignores when following the suggested orders by others.
The "over time" implies the momentum (balance) of ongoing motion (tick; tick; tick...) aka the ever changing moment ones choice needs to adapt to; which is what one ignores when choosing to want (good information) vs not want (bad information) suggestions by others.
All suggested information will "fall out" (actually transmute back into base aka form to flow); while the ongoing "time" represents the ongoing perceivable inspiration offered. Anyone can grow anything at any moment out of all perceivable inspiration...unless ignored for suggested information, out of which the continuously build the Tower of BA'BEL, noun [Heb.] - "confusion; disorder" and what remains once the tower of suggested information collapses yet again? The foundation of perceivable inspiration going on.
Have a sleight of hand through the suggested idol "Joe Esposito":
"a man’s got learn to take it"..."try to believe while the going gets rough"..."history repeats itself, try and you’ll succeed".."never doubt that you’re the one"..."You’re the best around"..."nothing’s gonna ever keep you down"..."Fight to the end"..."your life will depend on the strength that you have inside you"..."gotta be proud"..."standing out in the crowd when the odds and the game defy you"..."try your best to win the moment"..."fight ‘til you drop"..."Never stop"..."Can’t give up"..."Until you reach the title"..."Fight!"..."you’re the best in town"
The entire song (interwoven with true and false information) represents suggested words; yet the last line "Listen to that sound" contradicts the whole song by pointing out perceived inspiration (sound) over suggested information (word).
The singer; the movie; the actors; the music...all suggested distractions to tempt the consenting many to keep ignoring the perceived reality for suggested fiction. Perceivable inspiration is always there for those with eyes to see aka those who resist the temptation of suggested information... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oomCIXGzsR0