Couldn't we shrink the workforce in half but just banning women from working like things were barely 100 years ago?
Without women working to earn an income, they would be forced to be taken care of by the fathers or husbands. This would result in reduced consumption of resources; however, arguably, a lot of people's quality of life would improve.
The real reason behind women in the workplace was to assist in the destruction of the nuclear family. The values and morals were way too strong for them to corrupt until they put both mom and dad in the workplace and now nobody has the time to be the mom or dad.
Came here to basically post the same so this 👆🏻
Working woman are also psychologically more choosy in their mates. Woman have a hard time even being attracted to men who are of lower status than themselves. So if they have more education, a higher wage, a better car, unless the man is far better looking then most women will not even consider a relationship.
Add in a few lies like "its smart to focus on your career" "you can freeze your eggs" "you are as fertile at 30 as at 20" and "get and education and you can go anywhere" and you now have a trend where 50% of women haven't had a child at 30.
Biology, psychology, and propaganda in our new work culture has already destroyed human fertility.
And having both parents work is completely awful for the children. Not so bad for single children, but in any situation where an older child bullies their siblings without parents stopping that shit. Well those bullied children will turn out fearful or hateful, and the bullies will turn into sociopaths. Probably why schools have "zero tolerance" rules that favor bullies.
I'm not even sure if it was intentional at first, but it clearly feels like it is now.
Nothing to do with any of that. It doesn't matter which slave gets taxed. By women working it increases taxes. It also causes more services, and increasing consumption, boosting the economy. While most women are complete lefties, and now they need even more laws and dystopia, and an even easier cover to go and increase the taxes. The women have demanded it. It secured all their votes. Prior they'd just send us off to war. But at least we owned stuff. No sooner is there lessening birthrates, also causing increases to immigration boosting the economy's taxation and services.
Not every economy works like this. But advanced service nations do. They rely on screwing you.
Right but this sounds like they should want higher pops not lower pops then?
That's why there's so much immigration.
Women working or importing immigrants acheives the same goal: flood the labour market and drive down prices.
I don't think they're trying to kill everyone, they're trying to eliminate free men. Women, as a population, will inevitably give up control and the countries immigrants come from are already largely enslaved (as in the default behaviour is obedience).
The covid scare isn't about killing people (the virus barely does), it's about wealth transfer. Our governments just gave people like Bill Gates trillions of our dollars for snake oil. Snake oil we didn't even need.
They bankrupted our countries, cause inflation, bring in immigrants to keep wages down, and constantly try to pass laws to give themselves tyrannical powers. All the while encouraging our mpst degenerate behaviours until Joe Shmoe starts to think it would be better if we were all dead, and certainly beleives we deserve to be enslaved.
They don't want to kill us; they want to see how cheap we can be kept alive.
Today, the robots would do it better. What did they need you for?
The West gets hit to cause the run off. Or convince me otherwise.
Far more too it, but a much larger agenda to herald in newer technology for further gains and whatever makes them sleep. Any strategy is both competion and gain and containment. It's often that the technology has outdated the demands of its numbers. It doesn't even fully need them to utilise a newer era. Because those numbers are causing higher debt by becoming unmanageable for any advance, greater pushbacks. Until those numbers start to crunch for any technology demanding to become standardised. It therefore requires a reset or a reaction prompting it. How does the competition react, often by causing less numbers, and forcing any gain. Until it is almost at another point where hell, it's the run off of yet another cycle.
Robots are only better when they're cheaper, and they always need someone to troubleshoot issues and do setup.
If you can pay 20 salaries for the price of maintaining a robot for the year, why wouldn't you use humans?
It's not just about robots. It's about an indebted population pushing back on newer advancing technology profiting future gains. How do you force it. Think. And so to cause a successful run off precipating implementation the desired standardisation, it requires an abrupt method. Hence it starts to implode and always has done historically. Today I don't even think the AI causing it cares.
But there are far more aspects to it. What is that complete agenda. It seemingly also wants to reinvent the energy grid, and with it a host of products and services and distribution becoming affected. Where as a direct result will crunch the global population numbers. They just need to add some bellows.
To lower wages and damage the family unit
Because either they work or they make babies. Duh.
Keeping them in the workforce reduces the amount of freetime they have to procreate…
But they're consuming significantly more now. Also why bring in immigrants if trying to reduce pop and consumption?
They think there are too many people because of resource consumption. That is an entirely different matter from them holding jobs. If women can consume, then of course they want them to work as well.
But like isn't this counter to the whole "useless eaters" conspiracy? Like, if you reduce consumption then they aren't useless?