What one senses represents perceived differences within the momentum of motion. Slapping a suggested brand onto a moving subject; corrupts ones comprehension of perceived movement.
"Insane Person" represents a suggested brand; "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within; by; out of, and in response to perceived sound represents the perceived (reality) that is being ignored for the suggested (fiction).
branding makes more sense to some people when they can see a physical product
Why can they see form? Because it's being formed (life) within the momentum of flow (inception towards death). If you brand life as "John Doe" then it deceives those consenting to it to live "in the name of" a suggested brand; instead of in response to a perceived balance as the responding choice. Those who suggest the brand can define (idolized meaning); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the brand at their will for all those who already consented to it.
Here they are the product.
To be implies out of. Form implies formed by flow. Form represents the reactors within the generating flow; yet reacting implies having the choice to adapt to perceived (need) or ignore (want) it for suggested.
Branding something doesn't make it a product; it tempts others to ignore that whatever is being branded (by suggestion) was already produced (for perception).
they rebrand, rebrand, rebrand, rebrand, rebrand...
How long will this go on until the many question RE (response) BRAND (suggested idolized meaning)? The parasitic few can only rebrand; what the ignorant many already consented to by wanting or not wanting suggested (want) over perceived (need).
Before the suggested word comes the perceived sound...words represent the idolatry of sound. I'DOL, noun [Latin idolum; Gr. form]. As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) one needs to adapt to perceived inspiration (from within spirit); while resisting the temptation to want to consent to suggested information (from within form).
In short...
The few suggest idols; suggest idols; suggest idols; suggest idols; suggest idols...
The many consent; consent; consent; consent; consent...
The origin of a lie represents the contradiction of a suggested truth. Neither does nature lie; nor does it communicate truth...it moves everything within; which recipient senses perceive as inspiration. Truth implies choice being used to suggest you what is true; which only then opens up the opportunity to suggest what isn't true.
Your response to suggested true vs false; represents your choice of want vs not want. Those who make the suggestions rebranded want vs not want into true vs false to a) divide all those consenting to the suggestion against each other and b) to corrupt comprehension of choice consenting to suggestion causing the resulting conflict.
Branding makes more sense to some people when they can see a physical product. Here they are the product.
What one senses represents perceived differences within the momentum of motion. Slapping a suggested brand onto a moving subject; corrupts ones comprehension of perceived movement.
"Insane Person" represents a suggested brand; "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within; by; out of, and in response to perceived sound represents the perceived (reality) that is being ignored for the suggested (fiction).
Why can they see form? Because it's being formed (life) within the momentum of flow (inception towards death). If you brand life as "John Doe" then it deceives those consenting to it to live "in the name of" a suggested brand; instead of in response to a perceived balance as the responding choice. Those who suggest the brand can define (idolized meaning); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the brand at their will for all those who already consented to it.
To be implies out of. Form implies formed by flow. Form represents the reactors within the generating flow; yet reacting implies having the choice to adapt to perceived (need) or ignore (want) it for suggested.
Branding something doesn't make it a product; it tempts others to ignore that whatever is being branded (by suggestion) was already produced (for perception).
How long will this go on until the many question RE (response) BRAND (suggested idolized meaning)? The parasitic few can only rebrand; what the ignorant many already consented to by wanting or not wanting suggested (want) over perceived (need).
Before the suggested word comes the perceived sound...words represent the idolatry of sound. I'DOL, noun [Latin idolum; Gr. form]. As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) one needs to adapt to perceived inspiration (from within spirit); while resisting the temptation to want to consent to suggested information (from within form).
In short...
The few suggest idols; suggest idols; suggest idols; suggest idols; suggest idols...
The many consent; consent; consent; consent; consent...
The origin of a lie represents the contradiction of a suggested truth. Neither does nature lie; nor does it communicate truth...it moves everything within; which recipient senses perceive as inspiration. Truth implies choice being used to suggest you what is true; which only then opens up the opportunity to suggest what isn't true.
Your response to suggested true vs false; represents your choice of want vs not want. Those who make the suggestions rebranded want vs not want into true vs false to a) divide all those consenting to the suggestion against each other and b) to corrupt comprehension of choice consenting to suggestion causing the resulting conflict.
I noticed one of the C's is college. When more people are choosing alternatives, they teach the kids right back to debt slavery.
This is why it's not enough to constantly be defending. We must also teach our children (and normies) to defend themselves.
Aka self sustenance (need); while resisting the temptation (want) to ignore it for being against others (want versus not want).
Social emotional intelligence was a thing. This is another example of them changing a definition.