Modern medicine barely even wants to acknowledge parasites as a cause for disease, let alone mass psychosis. Yet we see evidence of this occurring in the animal kingdom.
a) the -ism implies suggested (want) over perceived (need).
b) "life is suffering" ignores that life represents growth (form) within loss (flow); hence being the resistance within temptation.
c) "suffering is due to desire" ignores that choice represents the center of balance (need/want aka responsibility/temptation). They try to blame desire instead of growing the response-ability of choice through resistance to temptation (desire aka want over need).
d) "the cure is letting go" requires comprehension of the perceived inspiration (need) over suggested information (want) deception. Letting go implies of what one already consented to uphold aka suggested information within memory (mind). They cannot point this out without contradicting the -ism within Buddhism aka the upheld belief of suggested information.
Before letting go comes the choice to resist holding onto; yet this choice based consent to hold onto represents the foundation for all suggested information; for all the -isms, for all idolized meaning; for the choice of others to get control over your choice. Nobody who suggests -isms will point that out without contradicting all his suggestions; but only oneself can grow comprehension thereof.
e) "walk the eight-folded path" represents the sales-pitch for whatever distractions the -ism is used to push. The trick with numbers is that counting is suggested; not perceived. Counting implies the choice to count the perceived; which only then allows the suggestion of numbers; yet what ONE (form) within ALL (flow) can count represents other ONEs.
There's no such thing as a perceivable "two" in nature; it's just a suggested label by ONE who counted other ONEs.
In short...choice within balance represents the responding center within perceived need/want. That's simplicity. The suggested choices by others will tell you endless other rules of behavior; just to bury the simple under the complex.
it took you long enough but good to see you acknowledge the ban lmao ivermectin for human consumption used as a prophylaxis is not the same as ivermectin with apple flavoring at the horse supply store lmao what you asked does not apply to the ban you tried your best not to acknowledge lmao new band starting here called daft shill lmao
That depends on the definitions of 'it' and 'freely'.
There is a difference between available and free buying. In the US if you want pharmaceutical grade ivermectin, a prescription is required, so it is not freely off the shelf. Yet it can be bought as animal treatment grade.
No, I am not mixing anything up. Pharmaceutic grade for humans is regulated tightly and has standards for chemical purity. The lower grade allowed for animals has less stringent purity and quality standards.
Modern medicine barely even wants to acknowledge parasites as a cause for disease, let alone mass psychosis. Yet we see evidence of this occurring in the animal kingdom.
How can you tell if that was successful or not?
Ask yourself if before the physical parasite can exploit a weakness; if there's a mental weakness that is being parasitically exploited?
Ignoring perceived need for suggested want represents that host to parasite relationship.
For choice within balance (need/want)...want (suggested) over need (perceived) represents the foundation for weakness.
a) the -ism implies suggested (want) over perceived (need).
b) "life is suffering" ignores that life represents growth (form) within loss (flow); hence being the resistance within temptation.
c) "suffering is due to desire" ignores that choice represents the center of balance (need/want aka responsibility/temptation). They try to blame desire instead of growing the response-ability of choice through resistance to temptation (desire aka want over need).
d) "the cure is letting go" requires comprehension of the perceived inspiration (need) over suggested information (want) deception. Letting go implies of what one already consented to uphold aka suggested information within memory (mind). They cannot point this out without contradicting the -ism within Buddhism aka the upheld belief of suggested information.
Before letting go comes the choice to resist holding onto; yet this choice based consent to hold onto represents the foundation for all suggested information; for all the -isms, for all idolized meaning; for the choice of others to get control over your choice. Nobody who suggests -isms will point that out without contradicting all his suggestions; but only oneself can grow comprehension thereof.
e) "walk the eight-folded path" represents the sales-pitch for whatever distractions the -ism is used to push. The trick with numbers is that counting is suggested; not perceived. Counting implies the choice to count the perceived; which only then allows the suggestion of numbers; yet what ONE (form) within ALL (flow) can count represents other ONEs.
There's no such thing as a perceivable "two" in nature; it's just a suggested label by ONE who counted other ONEs.
In short...choice within balance represents the responding center within perceived need/want. That's simplicity. The suggested choices by others will tell you endless other rules of behavior; just to bury the simple under the complex.
it took you long enough but good to see you acknowledge the ban lmao ivermectin for human consumption used as a prophylaxis is not the same as ivermectin with apple flavoring at the horse supply store lmao what you asked does not apply to the ban you tried your best not to acknowledge lmao new band starting here called daft shill lmao
So you get poisoned by the unnecessary death shot that is so safe and effective you have to be lied to or forced to take it
That depends on the definitions of 'it' and 'freely'.
There is a difference between available and free buying. In the US if you want pharmaceutical grade ivermectin, a prescription is required, so it is not freely off the shelf. Yet it can be bought as animal treatment grade.
No, I am not mixing anything up. Pharmaceutic grade for humans is regulated tightly and has standards for chemical purity. The lower grade allowed for animals has less stringent purity and quality standards.
WTF man. Pretty cray-cray.
Well you couldn't/can't freely buy it, so....
I remember there being a number of measures taken to make Ivermectin difficult or impossible to obtain for COVID-19 patients. Am I wrong about that?