The World Wars are only covers for setting up for their first, second and third dark ages in increasing scope.
The operations had already began since the fall of Rome, where Zionists called themselves Christians and started their millennium kingdom worth 10 centuries. You know the brainwashing is successful when people HERE still defend the clergy at that time.
a) CLERGY, noun - "the body of men set apart by due ordination". That's allegory for differentiation (form) through the natural order (flow), hence being different form (life) out of the same flow (inception towards death).
The issue here is consent to suggested "clergy" as an institution by others; instead of adapting as the perceivable "clergy" aka as form within flow. The meaning of the suggested term "clergy" represents the sales-pitch to deceive others into ignoring the perceived meaning.
b) defending the clergy represents self sustenance of form (resistance) within flow (velocity).
This is retrofitting history to Pike, it's not accurate.
The original had Pike using the word nazism before Nazi had become a word.
In reality, the devil has been trying and failing all this time. The reason WWII happened was that the WWI League of Nations didn't do enough so they needed another war to create the UN. Since then they've been trying to go to three but are constantly failing. The devil would love us to believe he had it planned all along but he is just the world's greatest opportunist, and constantly lies by pretending that ambiguous seed language or events that he previously planted had much more meaning than they did.
God will let them succeed one last time according to Ezek. 38-39 in such a way that he gets the glory for defeating them. He will then defeat the government that seizes control after that by tricking them into appearing at Armageddon, which is hardly a world war because it's a foregone conclusion against world war.
World war II. You had major American companies funding the Germans. I think most people don't know that. This is pretty crazy because weren't we sending troops over there!
Not at the time. The jew media LOVED Germany. First of all, no jew had been treated better in any other country besides prewar Germany. More importantly, Germany represented a useful ally to taking down imperialist Russia.
Once czar Nicholas and his family were disposed of in Jewish ritual murder and the second "revolution" took hold they didn't need Germany anymore.
The real "switch" was the signing of the Balfour declaration. You can look at old newspapers to confirm. Germany was the "freedom fighters" for the jews being murdered in "Russian programs" (never happened). Their agents in England bartered for Palestine and said they would use the jew media to force American involvement in the war they had no interest in.
Everything switched like a lightbulb. They used the media to boycott German goods which Germany relied heavily on. Remind you of anything today like throwing out vodka and not buying Russian gas, fertilizer, etc etc etc?
And Germany STILL let them stay. They fought them in every LEGAL way they could until one jew killed a gay Nazi diplomat claiming he was raped to bring embarrassment upon Germany. That's when Germany got rough with the jew. They put up with so much hunger and destitution which was brought on them by being NICE to the jew. It wasn't until they started murdering diplomats that started krystalnacht (night of broken glass, commonly confused with the "night of long knives" which were two different events"
Then Danzig, the "torch men orders" whatever we call it. Polish aggression, German response, jew newspapers lying about the whole thing. And the rest is history, as they say.
Look up WWI "Battle of Verdun"; propagated as the "Meat Grinder". Suggest a stage; point the order followers at each other and they will grind each other to dust. Misdirected resistance aka instead of for the sustenance of self (perceived); it's against others (suggested).
And what would the fighting be about?
Wanted vs not wanted suggestions.
What 'll be going on here in plain English that hillbillies could understand.
Others will tempt you with suggestions to destroy yourself (want vs not want); while you need to resist the temptation to ignore perceived (need) for suggested (want).
Those who fall for the suggestions of others will enact whatever narrative is being suggested to them.
Have a sleight of hand..."You gotta fight (resistance) for your right (perception) to party (comprehension)"
I knew you were talking about Pike before I finished the title...and I was going to say Islam and the West, but you put that in.
I do wonder why they made the distinction of calling it "political Zionism" instead of just Zionism.
What I was wanted to bring up was Napoleon and the U.S. Napoleon claimed that the U.S. could be "invaded from the south", and even had Maximillian installed as "Emperor of Mexico". But when I originally read about it, I don't think he was thinking that it would be something accomplished in his lifetime. And then you have the Soros convoys and trafficking across the boarder. A soft invasion.
The World Wars are only covers for setting up for their first, second and third dark ages in increasing scope.
The operations had already began since the fall of Rome, where Zionists called themselves Christians and started their millennium kingdom worth 10 centuries. You know the brainwashing is successful when people HERE still defend the clergy at that time.
a) CLERGY, noun - "the body of men set apart by due ordination". That's allegory for differentiation (form) through the natural order (flow), hence being different form (life) out of the same flow (inception towards death).
The issue here is consent to suggested "clergy" as an institution by others; instead of adapting as the perceivable "clergy" aka as form within flow. The meaning of the suggested term "clergy" represents the sales-pitch to deceive others into ignoring the perceived meaning.
b) defending the clergy represents self sustenance of form (resistance) within flow (velocity).
The "when" for each "one" represents "now". Whatever was accumulated into what now is, and whatever will be is being shaped right now into it.
The many ignore this; which in return allows the few to shape the many through suggestion.
Illumination represents growing comprehension of perceived; darkness represents ignoring perceived for suggestions; causing lack/loss of comprehension.
Aka control of currency (flow upon form) through banks (suggested barriers) within (intern) the people (nation).
This is retrofitting history to Pike, it's not accurate.
The original had Pike using the word nazism before Nazi had become a word.
In reality, the devil has been trying and failing all this time. The reason WWII happened was that the WWI League of Nations didn't do enough so they needed another war to create the UN. Since then they've been trying to go to three but are constantly failing. The devil would love us to believe he had it planned all along but he is just the world's greatest opportunist, and constantly lies by pretending that ambiguous seed language or events that he previously planted had much more meaning than they did.
God will let them succeed one last time according to Ezek. 38-39 in such a way that he gets the glory for defeating them. He will then defeat the government that seizes control after that by tricking them into appearing at Armageddon, which is hardly a world war because it's a foregone conclusion against world war.
https://www.militaryhistorynow.com/2021/10/10/storm-warnings-five-writers-that-predicted-the-horrors-of-ww1-with-uncanny-accuracy
Not at the time. The jew media LOVED Germany. First of all, no jew had been treated better in any other country besides prewar Germany. More importantly, Germany represented a useful ally to taking down imperialist Russia.
Once czar Nicholas and his family were disposed of in Jewish ritual murder and the second "revolution" took hold they didn't need Germany anymore.
The real "switch" was the signing of the Balfour declaration. You can look at old newspapers to confirm. Germany was the "freedom fighters" for the jews being murdered in "Russian programs" (never happened). Their agents in England bartered for Palestine and said they would use the jew media to force American involvement in the war they had no interest in.
Everything switched like a lightbulb. They used the media to boycott German goods which Germany relied heavily on. Remind you of anything today like throwing out vodka and not buying Russian gas, fertilizer, etc etc etc?
And Germany STILL let them stay. They fought them in every LEGAL way they could until one jew killed a gay Nazi diplomat claiming he was raped to bring embarrassment upon Germany. That's when Germany got rough with the jew. They put up with so much hunger and destitution which was brought on them by being NICE to the jew. It wasn't until they started murdering diplomats that started krystalnacht (night of broken glass, commonly confused with the "night of long knives" which were two different events"
Then Danzig, the "torch men orders" whatever we call it. Polish aggression, German response, jew newspapers lying about the whole thing. And the rest is history, as they say.
23 and me (for those with eyes to see).
Momentum
Look up WWI "Battle of Verdun"; propagated as the "Meat Grinder". Suggest a stage; point the order followers at each other and they will grind each other to dust. Misdirected resistance aka instead of for the sustenance of self (perceived); it's against others (suggested).
Wanted vs not wanted suggestions.
Others will tempt you with suggestions to destroy yourself (want vs not want); while you need to resist the temptation to ignore perceived (need) for suggested (want).
Those who fall for the suggestions of others will enact whatever narrative is being suggested to them.
Have a sleight of hand..."You gotta fight (resistance) for your right (perception) to party (comprehension)"
I knew you were talking about Pike before I finished the title...and I was going to say Islam and the West, but you put that in.
I do wonder why they made the distinction of calling it "political Zionism" instead of just Zionism.
What I was wanted to bring up was Napoleon and the U.S. Napoleon claimed that the U.S. could be "invaded from the south", and even had Maximillian installed as "Emperor of Mexico". But when I originally read about it, I don't think he was thinking that it would be something accomplished in his lifetime. And then you have the Soros convoys and trafficking across the boarder. A soft invasion.