I downloaded this app: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.bluetoothscanner to test the claim that the vaxxed emit a Bluetooth signal.
Sure enough, when near the vaxxed, you get Mac addresses, and it seems it can detect signals from quite a distance (potentially up to 20 Meters) The thing is, I can't verify if it's from their mobiles or their bodies. I am not on very intimate terms with any of the vaxxed so I can't ask them to go with me to a secluded place away from people without their phone to check if it's them.
I tested to see if the app will still show random Bluetooth addresses when away from people or any devices and sure enough it does not. So the app is not just generating some random numbers.
I think the vaxxed emitting a signal is possible, it's just that not many people tried to test it out, because everyone thinks: "It's so easy to test, surly we would have known by now!!" Please share your input so we can settle this once and for all!!
Richard Hall did an investigation into the bluetooth thing, and even preformed experiments with willing vaxxed participants. Start at 30mins 48seconds in the video at this link:
https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=295&part=3&gen=99
Thx, watching it now.
A few notes
The proper/better terminology to use in relation to vaccine ingredients emmitting identifiers is/are "RFIDs" or Radio Frequency IDs. See your nearest wikipedia.
RFIDs emit identifiers, of course. When they are subject to an appropriate electromagnetic radiation, the RFID chip absorbs some of the electromagnetic energy and returns an identifier.
RFIDs are old, old technology, came out in the first years of this millennium . Many people reading this will have multiple on them, in their clothes. Every "Gap" brand clothing item (and many, many other brand's items) come with a RFID in it. Costs less than a cent, and easy for item tracking & shoplifting prevention.
MAC address are network card identifiers
Bluetooth devices do not have MAC addresses. However, Bluetooth internal device identifiers are allocated from the same pool as MAC addresses, so an "expert" could say that Bluetooth internal IDs "are" MAC address. Experts only. Don't do that at home.
Off the topic, but MAC addresses and Bluetooth IDs are allocated from this pool: https://regauth.standards.ieee.org/standards-ra-web/pub/view.html
there is ABSOLUTELY no reason for any identifier issued by, either, an electromagnetic-field-exposed RFID, or an an electromagnetic-field-exposed vaccine component, to issue a MAC address. . .
. . .However . . . if you want to stretch it, or if you want to take a few bong hits and then stretch it, you could say that (1) the RFID would expect to emit a 32bit identifier, or less likely a 48 bit or less likely a 64 bit ID (2) MAC addresses and Bluetooth IDs are 48 or 64 bit identifiers (with extreme limitations) (3) like the multiple RFIDs on you - your collection of swipe cards, your GAP underpants . . . - a collection of 32bit IDs is a great, unique identifier.
Bluetruth
The nano-circuitry inside the body is powered by external sources - like WiFi routers and cell phone towers. That's why Faraday's cage experiments reveal nothing.
Thx for the info
The thing that bugs me about this theory is idea that it emerges from graphene. This might be possible in theory but I doubt it would result in an ID that is persistent over time. There are really small microprocessors (less than 1mm) but these are still 1000x too large to fit through a needle.
If it is emerging then I suspect it's a system that operates on absorbed EMF. We know graphene dipoles will do this. We're talking microvolts. I'm not sure if that is enough to transmit. So, I think energy density is another way to test plausibility.
Gates patent on human self powered bio nanochips
I'm in South America, and our housekeeper was already vaxxed before we hired her. I tested it out near here, and got no results.
That's how you know she lied about being Vaxxed.
She has no reason to lie to me about it. In fact, she knew our stance on the vax and was hesitant to tell us she'd gotten it. More likely she got the saline.
Yup, I'm also betting on the saline hypothesis!
Thanks for the feedback, much appreciated.
Tried it on an iPhone. Got dozens of "signals" but no Mac addresses. Interestingly there were no people within 7-8 yards of me.
From my tests, it seems to pick up signals from really far off, From more than 20 yards, that's why to be certain, it would best if we can test the jabbed in an area away from all devices and other people, possibly 50 meters away from people.
I might have to buy an android phone as a reference and then cross test with the iPhone.
Multiple people have analyzed the phenomenon, and they all find that vaxed people (I am not sure which vax type was in them) do have Bluetooth IDs in their bodies, detected when smart phones do a Bluetooth device query. Something in the people's bodies is responding to RF emissions. Most likely it is the weird nanodevices, visible in microscopes, that look much like miniature stealth bombers - jagged wings. Those are RF antennas.
If we can be certain of this, we need to spread it wide, it means this whole vax push is not about depopulation as is popularized, but a tag (maybe a small depop, as a side effect or bonus only).
It would be curious if this means, each person gets assigned a specific "vaccine" batch or how do they exactly make sure each person's address is unique, or does each human body has its own unique EM field signal and the RF antennas simply modulate or amplify it.
I had wondered too about the uniqueness aspect, how they could ensure it. There must be some random number generator in the nano device, one of sufficient knowable assignment to ensure no two people get the same id. Or in the manufacturing process, they add to each vial a nano with a unique code, in this way giving every vial uniqueness. Or, they add a standard nano and then program it in the vial on the manufacturing line, with an RF burst or something. I think that third case is the likely way.
This is easy to achieve using cyclical cyphers with a common key gen. RFA tokens for instance
Site down which has been backed up offline says multi stage process.
Chemtrail nano was stage one.
Lookup "bio api" and save pages offline before they wipe it.
Result examples.
DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) provides Web-based systems for biological analysis, called Web APIs for biology (WABI). So far, we have developed over 20 SOAP services and several workflows that consist of a series of method invocations...
....Towards a BioAPI compliant face verification system
Web API for biology with a workflow navigation system
The scary part is that this field seems to have progressed significantly and I didn't know it even existed. They really want to track every minute detail of their herd.
Humans can naturally communicate over long distances telepathically.
Nothing to fear from stupid satan trying to duplicate that ability technically.
The postwar start was the Macy Conferences 1946-53, cybernetics (steering) and early planning for the internet/digital age.
Di. Break apart.
Git. Mind, thought.
Al. All.
They started slowly with the atm machine, 666 upc barcode, digital clocks.
They know how to reincarnate. A valuable skill to learn...
Sources!?
And this Bluetooth emitter is powered how?
Please tell me, because this infinite and always stable energy source is clearly better than lithium technology, and I'll make a killing selling it to EV manufacturers.
alltheleavesarebrown linked this one: https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/search?q=Gates+patent+human+powered+microchip>
I am just like you, this claim seemed absolutely ludicrous, but who knows, should be quite easy to test anyhow.