I downloaded this app: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.bluetoothscanner to test the claim that the vaxxed emit a Bluetooth signal.
Sure enough, when near the vaxxed, you get Mac addresses, and it seems it can detect signals from quite a distance (potentially up to 20 Meters) The thing is, I can't verify if it's from their mobiles or their bodies. I am not on very intimate terms with any of the vaxxed so I can't ask them to go with me to a secluded place away from people without their phone to check if it's them.
I tested to see if the app will still show random Bluetooth addresses when away from people or any devices and sure enough it does not. So the app is not just generating some random numbers.
I think the vaxxed emitting a signal is possible, it's just that not many people tried to test it out, because everyone thinks: "It's so easy to test, surly we would have known by now!!" Please share your input so we can settle this once and for all!!
A few notes
The proper/better terminology to use in relation to vaccine ingredients emmitting identifiers is/are "RFIDs" or Radio Frequency IDs. See your nearest wikipedia.
RFIDs emit identifiers, of course. When they are subject to an appropriate electromagnetic radiation, the RFID chip absorbs some of the electromagnetic energy and returns an identifier.
RFIDs are old, old technology, came out in the first years of this millennium . Many people reading this will have multiple on them, in their clothes. Every "Gap" brand clothing item (and many, many other brand's items) come with a RFID in it. Costs less than a cent, and easy for item tracking & shoplifting prevention.
MAC address are network card identifiers
Bluetooth devices do not have MAC addresses. However, Bluetooth internal device identifiers are allocated from the same pool as MAC addresses, so an "expert" could say that Bluetooth internal IDs "are" MAC address. Experts only. Don't do that at home.
Off the topic, but MAC addresses and Bluetooth IDs are allocated from this pool: https://regauth.standards.ieee.org/standards-ra-web/pub/view.html
there is ABSOLUTELY no reason for any identifier issued by, either, an electromagnetic-field-exposed RFID, or an an electromagnetic-field-exposed vaccine component, to issue a MAC address. . .
. . .However . . . if you want to stretch it, or if you want to take a few bong hits and then stretch it, you could say that (1) the RFID would expect to emit a 32bit identifier, or less likely a 48 bit or less likely a 64 bit ID (2) MAC addresses and Bluetooth IDs are 48 or 64 bit identifiers (with extreme limitations) (3) like the multiple RFIDs on you - your collection of swipe cards, your GAP underpants . . . - a collection of 32bit IDs is a great, unique identifier.