In lieu of an earlier post, I find most people really don't know anything at all about the giants of our past, and often assume it's all a big myth. Lincoln was so matter of fact about it, likely because it was a general known fact at that time. In 1881, Congress gave sole excavation rights of these mounds to the Smithsonian and gave them thousands of tax payer dollars to do so more than once. We all know what happens when they get involved in recovering history; anything consequential disappears. Some of their findings were made public in their Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution for years 1873, 1875, and 1877. I'll post a link below to 1873 and you can change the years to view the rest. They found skulls measuring 36" in circumference, skeletons belonging to "gigantic savages," and so on. Publicly, The Smithsonian seems to mostly or only talk about the EASTERN mounds, but look for the stories from the Anasazi and also San Canyon Pueblo where footprints of 6 toed giants were found.
Would love to see what anyone knows about all this or give more info for those that want to know more. Of course this is just a glimpse of the story, definitely enough here to get started. This rabbit hole goes on and on once you start, but you will not be disappointed. It's more like, whole rabbit.
For those that want to go down the Giants/Nephilim road, there's also a very convincing story about giant remains being found on Jekyll island, along with a sacrificial altar built the same way the Canaanites built theirs. If it's true, the building that the infamous banksters' meeting happened in was built right on top of that altar. Search for Tim Bence on that story.
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/34977#page/426/mode/1up (Human skull found measured 36 inches in circumference) https://quod.lib.umich.edu/l/lincoln/lincoln2/1:6?rgn=div1;view=fulltext https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CRECB-1881-pt3-v11/pdf/GPO-CRECB-1881-pt3-v11-12.pdf
What I've never been able to put my finger on is exactly why they have gone to such incredible effort to cover up the existence of giants, and succeeded virtually completely in annihilating record of them.
I mean, maybe it puts a bit a kink in "Evolution" (but they don't seem too worried about the huge plot holes there) and it lends some support to the Bible, but otherwise who cares? They could have simply written them all off as genetic freaks, and say they all evolved out of existence as further proof of evolution.
There's nothing even very surprising or shocking in the stories of humans dealing with them. Okay, some were cannibals, but so are some regular humans. And yeah, I fully believe they were the Nephilim, offspring of humans and Fallen Angels, but the mainstream could have just declared that to be superstitious nonsense of primitives that did not know genetics.
I get the distinct sense that there has got to be something very, very big (haha) that giants leads to. Best guess is that some or all of the Tartarians were giants, and they certainly did a great job of erasing Tartaria.
Well since we are on conspiracy I’ll throw in my crazy.
The plot holes in evolution, the really weak “simulation theory” items pushed in our pop scientism. (Ex. 1) (Ex. 2) (Ex. 3) Are similar to Buddhism, Gnosticism, hermeticism, Freemasons, illuminate, and even philosophical views such as nihilism and postmodernism. These all share a similar views of essentially reality is fake and gay, either kill yourself or kill others on the way out. This inverts the Christian ethic of us being responsible for every action, every thought, that we aren’t victims.
I think covering up Nephilim, the true nature of reality, the subversion of Christianity, the creepy occult obsession of a SIGNIFICANT amount of powerful people from the beginning of time until now all point towards something higher than ourselves.
I’m a Christian so I have that bias. Honestly I was agnostic most of my life but the more I saw creepy occult stuff among the elite led me to study religion more.
Even science has such poor answers that it’s almost lazy. Simulation theory (who made the simulation?) directed panspermia (who directed all that jizz?) life evolving from primordial soup struck by lightening (lol Ancient Greece called they want their mythology back), ancient aliens(gods and demons relabeled ET), it’s all essentially hinging religious beliefs that make less sense the more we learn.
I think there’s a deliberate effort to take us further from the truth because they want to ursup God. It’s luciferian. Any school of thought that tells you “you don’t matter” “existence doesn’t matter” “it’s all an illusion” “random chance” all lead people to suicide, disillusionment, terrible decisions. I truly think these philosophies are purposely harmful to humans.
I’m done rambling but I’ll close with this: don’t let anyone tell you you don’t matter existence doesn’t matter, you do matter.
I have both views. I think we are living in a simulation, but one that we control. We are responsible for our actions, because we create the simulation. We create our own experience and we create our effects on others.
If we are living in a simulation, then your idea that this is a simulation is also apart of the simulation. It defeats itself.
It’s akin to saying reality is false, except for the part that told me reality is false.
I don't see why thats a problem or how that "defeats itself". Everything is simulation. If everything is simulation, nothing is. You are responsible for your actions. Just because reality is an illusion / simulation / trick, doesnt mean that its not real. Just because video games are their own simulated realities doesn't mean that they're not real, it doesn't mean you can't learn from them, have experiences with them, etc.
Illusions have their purposes.