The article is based, ignoring the risks presented by war. An obvious threat and a direct problem. Refugees are also going where? While resources relied on for mutal trade and reciprocal standing are directly threatened, presenting much larger global instability.
It doesn't mean I agree or disagree. What it does mean is that this article's rationality hasn't been calculated.
Russia also manufactures competing weapons. It is a global arms dealer. Tech has made its way to competing alliances.
Nobody sane wants WW3, does it mean let everyone do what they want. Wishful, because it would've been much easier, rather than any nukes, supposedly deterring. A huge risk.
Obviously that concern works both ways. They threaten each other. But it's not that dulled out article's naivety. Let Russia do what it wants, promising it's just another sheep, as it quickly turns into a bear.
WWIII will be the last war and the indignant demise of the American Empire. And the current social order.
If it happens, the it means the oligarchy is done with America, and it will be transferred to the benevolent rule of the UN Blue Helmets, who will proceed to capture, behead and gas Americans mercilessly in FEMA Camps.
the fall of the american empire was always inevitable. ALWAYS. it is NOT sustainable! America got way too greedy, tried to influence too much in the world, and didn't fall back to protect itself within. we are being destroyed year over year more and more. other countries will take notice and stomp.
i dont think so. it could actually be possible that he WAS a WEF young world leader in the past, but perhaps he did actually say "fuck this shit , im out". and is rebelling.
thats why ALL the nations that are the typical ones are against him. how would this be part of the "great reset"? if he WERE still part of wef?
The article is based, ignoring the risks presented by war. An obvious threat and a direct problem. Refugees are also going where? While resources relied on for mutal trade and reciprocal standing are directly threatened, presenting much larger global instability.
It doesn't mean I agree or disagree. What it does mean is that this article's rationality hasn't been calculated.
Russia also manufactures competing weapons. It is a global arms dealer. Tech has made its way to competing alliances.
Nobody sane wants WW3, does it mean let everyone do what they want. Wishful, because it would've been much easier, rather than any nukes, supposedly deterring. A huge risk.
Obviously that concern works both ways. They threaten each other. But it's not that dulled out article's naivety. Let Russia do what it wants, promising it's just another sheep, as it quickly turns into a bear.
WWIII will be the last war and the indignant demise of the American Empire. And the current social order.
If it happens, the it means the oligarchy is done with America, and it will be transferred to the benevolent rule of the UN Blue Helmets, who will proceed to capture, behead and gas Americans mercilessly in FEMA Camps.
the fall of the american empire was always inevitable. ALWAYS. it is NOT sustainable! America got way too greedy, tried to influence too much in the world, and didn't fall back to protect itself within. we are being destroyed year over year more and more. other countries will take notice and stomp.
Please take your meds.
i dont think so. it could actually be possible that he WAS a WEF young world leader in the past, but perhaps he did actually say "fuck this shit , im out". and is rebelling.
thats why ALL the nations that are the typical ones are against him. how would this be part of the "great reset"? if he WERE still part of wef?
we dont know yet....a lot has to play out for us to ACTUALLY SEE.