There's an article from Jerusalem Post from four days ago about this being the war of Gog and Magog.
I just searched it, because it came to mind...
One thing that stood out, besides that the author was "debunking" this being the war of Gog and Magog, is the line from Revelation about the "“dragon” of earlier chapters is now fully identified and exposed as “that serpent of old, who is the Devil and Satan"".
I would say that to some extent, it's pretty obvious who Satan has influence over. Isn't The Weeknd the one who had the word "Satan" flash up on the screen at his concert? That seems rather directly identifiable and exposing.
Nevertheless, at the end of that article, the author says of course this isn't the war of Gog and Magog, and he closes with this line,
"All this being said, may we never be distracted from the task now at hand – continuing to regather the Jewish people and help secure their place in the Land of Israel for what lies ahead."
He references the Bible a ton, but curiously skips over Ezekiel 20-Israel's History of Infidelity. Does that make them infidels?
Does he forget that they are gathering for judgment? The last five or six verses of Ezekiel 20 are pretty instructive...but verse 44 is pretty direct...
"And you shall know that I am the LORD when I deal with you thus, for my name's sake, and not according to your evil conduct and corrupt actions, O house of Israel, says the Lord GOD."
Could you imagine if I said I was going to gather all the German people and secure their place in Germany, and displace/sterilize/kill anyone already there?
I'm pretty sure we are all honed in on who the Nazis really are.
I've been questioning the official WW2 narrative for awhile now. Stories like this, and points like yours, lead me to believe WW2 is much more complex than the simple narrative we have been fed over the years. The narrative we have been fed is the narrative of the victors over a conquered people without consideration, or perspective, from the conquered.
You don't hear JACK about Britain taking over Palestine either. But if the British royal family is Jewish (or Khazarian, mind you...Vlad the Impaler and all), then they had already established their stead, and the "Balfour Declaration" was even less than a formality. I'm sure that Israel will claim that nothing was done that would "prejudice the civil rights of Palestinians", like that Declaration states was supposed to happen. Yeah, sure.
That's rather interesting, because I just saw a post recently that compared the Russian coat of arms to the Rothschilds' crest. (I haven't compared them too closely at all).
So the eagle thing...is this all under the auspices of Aquila or something?
I don't know. All I know about the eagle is that it symbolizes the sun ,because just like the sun it is the most powerful thing in the sky, according to Jordan Maxwell.
And everyone wants to have to be associated with it.
I just find it interesting that Aquila generally holds two spears, and these eagles are always clutching something.
Perhaps it is a sun reference. I could see it with the outstretched wings and all.
Aquila is a symbol you don't see used very often, especially by Christians. The only place I've seen it there specifically is the floor murals in the church of St. Catherine of Siena (which are quite different than the norm).
One occult drawing has Aquila figuring prominently over an alchemical cave that Adam and Eve (or Sol and Luna) are entering. That's a really crappy version of that engraving...but it is an interesting one.
There's an article from Jerusalem Post from four days ago about this being the war of Gog and Magog.
I just searched it, because it came to mind...
One thing that stood out, besides that the author was "debunking" this being the war of Gog and Magog, is the line from Revelation about the "“dragon” of earlier chapters is now fully identified and exposed as “that serpent of old, who is the Devil and Satan"".
I would say that to some extent, it's pretty obvious who Satan has influence over. Isn't The Weeknd the one who had the word "Satan" flash up on the screen at his concert? That seems rather directly identifiable and exposing.
Nevertheless, at the end of that article, the author says of course this isn't the war of Gog and Magog, and he closes with this line,
"All this being said, may we never be distracted from the task now at hand – continuing to regather the Jewish people and help secure their place in the Land of Israel for what lies ahead."
He references the Bible a ton, but curiously skips over Ezekiel 20-Israel's History of Infidelity. Does that make them infidels?
Does he forget that they are gathering for judgment? The last five or six verses of Ezekiel 20 are pretty instructive...but verse 44 is pretty direct...
"And you shall know that I am the LORD when I deal with you thus, for my name's sake, and not according to your evil conduct and corrupt actions, O house of Israel, says the Lord GOD."
That last line sounds very similar to:
"We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children."
Conceptually, I see no difference between the two lines.
Could you imagine if I said I was going to gather all the German people and secure their place in Germany, and displace/sterilize/kill anyone already there?
I'm pretty sure we are all honed in on who the Nazis really are.
I've been questioning the official WW2 narrative for awhile now. Stories like this, and points like yours, lead me to believe WW2 is much more complex than the simple narrative we have been fed over the years. The narrative we have been fed is the narrative of the victors over a conquered people without consideration, or perspective, from the conquered.
The easiest part of the narrative to question is this:
Germany bad, therefore Jews get Palestine. Sorry, wars don't work like that. Who was really taking over land and conquering, as you said?
You don't hear JACK about Britain taking over Palestine either. But if the British royal family is Jewish (or Khazarian, mind you...Vlad the Impaler and all), then they had already established their stead, and the "Balfour Declaration" was even less than a formality. I'm sure that Israel will claim that nothing was done that would "prejudice the civil rights of Palestinians", like that Declaration states was supposed to happen. Yeah, sure.
Have you seen the russian coat of arms that has a knight killing a dragon?
It might not be the case here , but this war goes beyond the physical world into what people call 4th and 5th dimension where energetic beings reside.
With enough technology or innate ability one can jump in the past and interfere with the future or prepare for something in the future.
That's rather interesting, because I just saw a post recently that compared the Russian coat of arms to the Rothschilds' crest. (I haven't compared them too closely at all).
So the eagle thing...is this all under the auspices of Aquila or something?
I don't know. All I know about the eagle is that it symbolizes the sun ,because just like the sun it is the most powerful thing in the sky, according to Jordan Maxwell.
And everyone wants to have to be associated with it.
I just find it interesting that Aquila generally holds two spears, and these eagles are always clutching something.
Perhaps it is a sun reference. I could see it with the outstretched wings and all.
Aquila is a symbol you don't see used very often, especially by Christians. The only place I've seen it there specifically is the floor murals in the church of St. Catherine of Siena (which are quite different than the norm).
One occult drawing has Aquila figuring prominently over an alchemical cave that Adam and Eve (or Sol and Luna) are entering. That's a really crappy version of that engraving...but it is an interesting one.