14
Comments (7)
sorted by:
5
pkvi [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Its remarkable how many started in 2015 fact checking groups started.. was all the rage to rage against one side of culture.. but for the sustainment of these when they don't do anything is the sinister part. Its more of that copy editor shit where these people are paid to attach their name to a product regardless of their inability to verify it.. just so the copy editor can say they did.

Seriously.. WTF could Kaylin Dodson from NYC do as to verify a fact in Ukraine? She can't even count calories let alone cohoax case numbers.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
-1
GhostOfKyiv -1 points ago +1 / -2

Narcissism is pervasive online.

4
pkvi [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

#BurnTheBridge

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +2 / -1

HOW can these organizations survive fiscally? Bcz they don't do anything.

Suggested money has no value unless consenting choice evaluates it. Suggested information has no value unless consenting choice evaluates it.

The highest value in perceived existence (balance) represents evaluation (choice); yet choice implies the option to ignore perceived (inspiration) for suggested (information).

Those who ignore perceived everything (reality) for suggested nothing (fiction) are controlled by the simple perpetuation of suggested information. In other words...the parasitic few "don't have to do anything" special to keep exploiting the ignorance of the many; just keeping the frequency of suggestion going aka feeding the cattle their narratives.

1
LesboPregnancyScare 1 point ago +1 / -0

even those Snopes articles that state something is "false" but in the article narrative state "yeah its basically true" are there so they can feed the social media algorithms that block/censor people from posting. The algorithm points to the shit article with the "false, but really true" conclusion.

As much as people dont like Trump, he is the reason they started doing this, because viral internet was behind the Trump train and got him elected.

0
pkvi [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ayh would argue that Trump was part of the plot to navigate this behavior and controlling narrative. Using him as a motivator to turn liberals into censors worked by employing a radical looking conservative.