New 9/11 footage
(youtu.be)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (78)
sorted by:
Why is it really that surprising? It was 2001, it might have even been recorded on physical tape. Transferring a digital copy to a PC might not have been a trivial thing. So you are claiming the entire video and all the audio that went with it was fake? That would be quite some effort for a random youtube video with only a few thousand views.
That's my take: this is a fabricated video/scene. There isn't much tearing/artifacting in the fast moving areas. It looks like it was downsampled into 480p from a much higher resolution that didn't really exist in 2001.
I don't buy it.
I also don't buy the "no plane" theory. How difficult is it to put drone controls in an aircraft and rig it to blow? I could do that with the trillion dollars of unaccounted for Pentagon funding.
I also don't buy the "this attack was a surprise" narrative. 2996 dead? 265 people combined on four commercial planes? The planes were flying at only 30% capacity? Even during the height of Covid restrictions the average flight was filled to more than 50% capacity.
"2700 people died in the world trade centers" -wiki Planes hit two 110 story buildings at floors 75 & 95. Assuming everyone below those floors escaped, that's only 2700 people on the top 50 floors. A lot? That's 50 people per floor. One person spaced every 10 yards. Roughly 10% of recommended office density. During premarket.
Why are all the people-holding containers involved with 9/11 operating at such low capacity?
If you don't buy the no plane theory, what would be the point of fabricating the video?
If you saw a chick's left titty and got hard, then she might show you her left titty every time she wants you to get hard. If some day 20 years later you're desensitized and her left titty doesn't get you hard, what if she shows you the other titty. Boing! Like a rock. But the right titty is saggy (or the video doesn't exist) so they have to use CGI and fake it.
The brand new angle is meant to get the warriors hard for blood. There is immense value in the way the brain processes novelty, especially a new view of an old situation.
It could be a legitimate video, held back from the public all this time for the same reason/purpose.
Why is it when you see the planes go into the building you DONT see anything from the wake of the plane and the smoke?
Intelligence agency production? On a youtube video with a few k views? There are many videos out there already similar to this one. Ie here is one from a very similar angle: https://youtu.be/ZsP-Gt52P2A Seems like peoples critical thinking skills have gone out the window.
That and disinformation agents being planted in every community to muddy the waters, blur the lines, and have you lumped in with flatearthers and Qtards to be easily dismissed.
Earth being a spinning globe was made up by inbred jews and satanists. You sound like a reddit pedo.
This is how I know you are a moron.
I found 3 old birthday tapes 2 weeks ago in some boxes in our old house. From 97 to 2001. Told my father to go to this store and ask for those to be converted in digital format. All 3 tapes, approx 80 min total in footage cost 10 euros.
Again, either a moron or a glownigger. Do you know how police, and the CIA produce fake evidence? And most importantly, how to plant it to be believable?
How old are you?
The video matches with countless other videos from other angles. You must have literally no IQ.
Have you seen September Clues?
Yes I watched it. It was the dumbest most absurd propaganda I had ever seen. Trying to convince people that something that was witnessed by thousands upon thousands of people, and captured hundreds of times by amateur and professional videographers was all some kind of CGI hoax. You'd have to be close to brain dead to believe it.
I havent, and I will watch it right now. Thnx.
The person you're replying to is saying digitizing was not trivial in 2001. It was not trivial, because not everyone had a TV tuner/capture card as standard equipment on their PC. Now technology has advanced to where it would be trivial for anyone to get an analog capture dongle. It would not have been trivial to even get a capture card in 2001, let alone do this transfer yourself. Its the kind of equipment a wedding photographer, or other enthusiast, might have in 2001.
Its so trivial you told your dad to do go do it at the local store, for you, right?
You are the one who sounds like an ignorant child.
kys glownigger