You are reasoning about semite (want) vs ashkenazi khazarian (not want). Take the suggestions away (ashekenazism; khazarianism; semitism) and you have the conflict of want vs not want...a) this conflict ignores need (perceived) for want (suggested) and b) when you say "are not" it's caused by you choice to "not want".
The suggestion of others is tricking you to consent to reason about "nothing" and your ignorance aka want of suggested over need of perceived is why you lack comprehension of the perceived issue.
jews; zionists
Suggested judaism; zionism.
youtube
TUBE, noun [Latin tubus.] - "a vessel of animal bodies or plants, which conveys a fluid or other substance" aka "you" representing form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...you-tube.
that is a lie
"that" implies you consenting to suggested meaning (wikipedia); which you are now reason about aka want (truth) vs not want (lie). Truth vs lie represents the suggested rebranding of want vs not want.
If you are being moved as life from inception towards death; then you cannot define a "truth"; nor does what moves you contain a "lie".
I don’t get the “virtual Jew ghost” thing… what’s that mean? is it totally just a joke? Or are you saying that’s your online persona, or something?
Oh - or do you describe yourself that way to try to reduce the amount of shit you get when posting about certain topics? Probably a stupid question, but what the fuck. Just curious, so I’m asking.
The trick (contract law) has a foundation (natural law). Every -ism implies choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law; which represents the inversion of balance (offer) to choice (respond) natural law.
In other words...the few suggest (word); then many consent to ignore perceived (sound). All -ism are being defined; redefined and contradicted only at the will of those suggesting them; while all consenting to them are stuck within the conflict of reason (want vs not want) against each other.
Antisemitism; communism; capitalism; feminism; vegetarianism etc. are suggested by the few; and the many are stuck reasoning among themselves over wanting or not wanting whatever meaning the few attach to it. Why the attachment? Because their consent to the suggestion of the few represents a choice to choice contract aka the submission of those who consent to the will of those who suggest.
Under natural law...only nature offers; and every one within responses by choice; yet choice (need/want) implies the choice to ignore need (natures offer aka perceived inspiration) for want (suggested information by others).
Who makes the rules? Communists.
Communist implies your consent to suggested communism; hence you reasoning (want vs not want) about the suggested orders by others; while ignoring that the natural order for form (life) represents flow (inception towards death). Life needs to resist being moved towards death; hence representing the resistance (form) to the natural order of velocity (flow). Suggestions of others (their orders) can trick you to ignore resistance for obedience aka consenting to suggested progressivism (going with the flow; the mainstream; the chain of command; the communist party-line; the societal norm; the civil code of conduct etc.).
We cannot make; we shape (form) out of everything already made (flow).
You consented to suggested information (want) over perceived inspiration (need); which then tempted you to choose to not want it; while using an accusation (bot) to disregard both suggested information and perceived inspiration.
What if I'm not a bot? More accusations (drug-abuse; schizophrenic; word-salad; nonsense etc.)? What if a less restricted free will of choice isn't bound to suggested -isms; yet those who consent to them (by choice) don't see it?
Reminds me of that creepy Disney bit (think it was Disney, but it was like a 20 min video) of "Black Mamba" Kobe Bryant telling kids about how to harness their "dark energy".
Ashkenazi khazarians are not semites. Or even jews. Theyre zionists. Youtube ceo... her wikipedia she calls herself a jew. But that is a lie.
You are reasoning about semite (want) vs ashkenazi khazarian (not want). Take the suggestions away (ashekenazism; khazarianism; semitism) and you have the conflict of want vs not want...a) this conflict ignores need (perceived) for want (suggested) and b) when you say "are not" it's caused by you choice to "not want".
The suggestion of others is tricking you to consent to reason about "nothing" and your ignorance aka want of suggested over need of perceived is why you lack comprehension of the perceived issue.
Suggested judaism; zionism.
TUBE, noun [Latin tubus.] - "a vessel of animal bodies or plants, which conveys a fluid or other substance" aka "you" representing form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...you-tube.
"that" implies you consenting to suggested meaning (wikipedia); which you are now reason about aka want (truth) vs not want (lie). Truth vs lie represents the suggested rebranding of want vs not want.
If you are being moved as life from inception towards death; then you cannot define a "truth"; nor does what moves you contain a "lie".
I don’t get the “virtual Jew ghost” thing… what’s that mean? is it totally just a joke? Or are you saying that’s your online persona, or something? Oh - or do you describe yourself that way to try to reduce the amount of shit you get when posting about certain topics? Probably a stupid question, but what the fuck. Just curious, so I’m asking.
Probably, but it's still funny.
The trick (contract law) has a foundation (natural law). Every -ism implies choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law; which represents the inversion of balance (offer) to choice (respond) natural law.
In other words...the few suggest (word); then many consent to ignore perceived (sound). All -ism are being defined; redefined and contradicted only at the will of those suggesting them; while all consenting to them are stuck within the conflict of reason (want vs not want) against each other.
Antisemitism; communism; capitalism; feminism; vegetarianism etc. are suggested by the few; and the many are stuck reasoning among themselves over wanting or not wanting whatever meaning the few attach to it. Why the attachment? Because their consent to the suggestion of the few represents a choice to choice contract aka the submission of those who consent to the will of those who suggest.
Under natural law...only nature offers; and every one within responses by choice; yet choice (need/want) implies the choice to ignore need (natures offer aka perceived inspiration) for want (suggested information by others).
Communist implies your consent to suggested communism; hence you reasoning (want vs not want) about the suggested orders by others; while ignoring that the natural order for form (life) represents flow (inception towards death). Life needs to resist being moved towards death; hence representing the resistance (form) to the natural order of velocity (flow). Suggestions of others (their orders) can trick you to ignore resistance for obedience aka consenting to suggested progressivism (going with the flow; the mainstream; the chain of command; the communist party-line; the societal norm; the civil code of conduct etc.).
We cannot make; we shape (form) out of everything already made (flow).
You consented to suggested information (want) over perceived inspiration (need); which then tempted you to choose to not want it; while using an accusation (bot) to disregard both suggested information and perceived inspiration.
What if I'm not a bot? More accusations (drug-abuse; schizophrenic; word-salad; nonsense etc.)? What if a less restricted free will of choice isn't bound to suggested -isms; yet those who consent to them (by choice) don't see it?
That is a nice way to mark yourself as a target. As if google didnt have enough profiling data on everybody...
I meant that about ppl who started using ((()))... They were thinking of marking the jews, while the jews used the same symbols to identify the enemy.
r/topminds is a private community now, just tried the site. Just thought you should know.
That is pretty hilarious. Fleeing for the mountains they are.
Reminds me of that creepy Disney bit (think it was Disney, but it was like a 20 min video) of "Black Mamba" Kobe Bryant telling kids about how to harness their "dark energy".
Oh, here it is...Kobe Bryant's "Musecage" from ESPN.
"Dark musings...may be our greatest source of energy and power." Sure Kobe, sure.
Kobe went private too.
I'm pretty antisemitic FBI and ADL. Based on your definitions.
based. u/#Clownworld