Thomas Jefferson said when the Gov no longer protects our Rights but rather shits all over them and no matter how much we protest, they don't stop shitting all over our Rights, then it's time to Abolish Government and set up something new if we wish.
He said it is not only our Right to do this but our Duty.
This is also consider our Natural Right under Natural Law which is that our Rights come from God, Nature or Reason.
To run the new Government by the People, all we have to do is use Social Media sites like Reddit as our Town Hall. For example, if a bridge needs repair in Austin, TX, the local residents go on this board and mention the problem. They call the local repair Company. There are no taxes in the New Government so the Repair Company simply raises their funds online using crowdfunding systems such as GiveSendGo. The locals would be interested in funding such a project so that they can get to work or a friends house, ect.. using that bridge.
Our Police would be crowdfunded regularly using the same method. The Police are loyal to whoever pays them so they would be loyal to the People in this case. If they screw around, the funding is cut off.
Studies show that nobody can ever beat the American Civilians in a ground war. We have too many Arms. Our country is therefore protected as long as we keep our Arms.
Anytime anyone wants to participate in Politics, just hope on Social Media and state your concerns. This can happen in a local city sub or a general sub like this one.
We are in a serious emergency now because the Gov doesn't seem to respect the law anymore as there are plenty of Human Rights violations to name. No matter how much we beg, they don't seem to care. We can choose an official abolishment date for the future but we should consider it loosely abolished even now.
Congratulations folks. We are the New US Government now. We are all leaders and followers at the same time. Got good ideas? Spread them and if they are good, the People will use them. That's how we lead. Need our help? Ask for it. We are a team now.
Yes no Gov.
All we need is Natural Law. (Don’t kill, steal, ect..).
Also we need a way to run Politics (ie fix broken infrastructure, improve air quality, ect…) which can be done naturally through Social Media.
This isn’t traditional Gov. We are the owners of this country as a People so we want to run our Country without Politicians.
a) need implies want; hence choice in response to balance (need/want)
b) "all we" ignores each ONE within ALL for the sustenance of self.
c) if one represents form (life) within flow (inception towards death); then flow defines the natural law for the resulting form within. How does flow define itself towards internal form? By communicating perceivable movement (inspiration for response).
d) "don't" aka doing nothing represents ignorance of being done (form) by everything (flow).
e) don't kill ignores that the status quo of life implies being processed towards death; hence being in temporary resistance (form) to ongoing velocity (flow). This struggle to resist implies unrestricted "free" will of choice to be able to respond to the "dom"inance of balance (momentum) aka free-dom. "don't do..." implies the suggested choices of others as the temptation to ignore resistance as choice.
To take a life (killing) is defined by ones choice of need (self sustenance) or want (temptation to ignore need)...not by the suggested pre and after judgement by the choice of others.
f) to steal implies choice of want over need; and it also ignores that form cannot "own" anything within flow; hence being temporary (growth) within ongoing (loss). Stealing represents the response to those who consent to suggested ownership; while ignoring that flow "owns" each vessel within motion (form). ONE needs to use ALL; while resisting the temptation to want to claim any other ONE.
Grow your comprehension of govern (control) + ment (from mens; mind) and that your choice of response to perceived controls your mind; unless ignored for suggested "government" by others.
Without governments we would be left to corporations. Who would own the nukes.
ERROR TRY AGAIN!
No we dismantle all nukes. Don’t need them.
You'll do that in your garage? And then who's to stop them from making more the gov...
You know the constitutions exists for a reason. Which is why it's taken them the better part of it's existence to try and dismantle it.
We are 7 billion large around the world. It is inevitable that we team up and use coordination to make the world a better place simply because it benefits us all.
At that point, we will have our People crawling all over the world and some of them will cross paths with the nukes and report back. From that point, we have to figure out how to safely dismantle them.
Wow. You know we better form some sort of government to coordinate all of that.
Preferably not a one world government, ran by corporations, after disabling the constitution. Because that's what's already going on. And for some reason seems to be where you talking points lead to.
Corporations running the world? I never said that. I said all of us running the world as a giant team to solve problems and uphold Natural Law.
So unspecified teams good, patriotism and constitutional republic bad. Got it. And this will all just happen organically through natural law, with no one operating the projector from behind the curtain.
Sounds great! where do I sign up to become an associate!
We are all a part of it. No need to sign up. Participation is voluntary. Want to discuss politics? I recommend social media subs like this one. It’s all very simple.
I hear the aliens are doing that.
LOL. GOOD LUCK WITH THAT/
No funding means no police. We need police to enforce Natural Law.
What governs ment (mind)? Could it be the choice between perceived input ( needed inspiration) and suggested input (wanted information)?
How about instead of wanting to abolish choice; one questions the need to respond as choice to origin?
Nature represents balance (need/want) within movement; reason represents ignorance of perceived balance for suggested imbalance (want vs not want).
Reasoning implies responding as choice to whatever suggested one wants or not wants to reason about; while nature implies source of choice. In other words...reason implies within nature; about nature; while ignoring nature.
...what others suggest or respond to the reality perceived.
a) who controls these funds; what prevents them from being tempted to add zeros to suggested digital fiat for their own benefit?
b) life is already on the line from inception towards death; with the implied function of resisting it; not consenting to "online" suggestions.
As resistance (form) to the force/natural law of velocity (flow) what does it imply to ignore this for suggested law enforcement. Also...enforcement represents force upon mind; yet suggestion implies choice (suggests) to choice (consents) contract law.
How exactly did consent to suggested payment (paying mind) led to disloyalty among choices?
How do you enforce law upon disloyal law enforcement? Let me guess...private security forces and a military industrial complex?
...the corruption of suggested scientism under nondisclosure agreements (agreeing minds)...such studies are available at --redacted--
HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form] + RIGHT, adjective [Latin rectus, rego] - "to strain or stretch, whence straight". What if life represents the stretching of form by the flow that stretches it from inception towards death?
Can form interrupt (violation) flow? There can never be a suggested "human (form) right (flow) violation (interrupting)...only the ignorance of those within towards the perceived status quo.
NAME, noun - "sound used to express"...choice represents the expression of perceived sound (resonance); not words suggested by others (dissonance). What names does nature give to itself?
Choice implies response to balance; hence as form within the ever changing moment(um) of flow. Ignoring that which is (momentum) for that which is suggested (future) represents the abolished mind aka shirking of response-ability (choice) to perceived reality (balance).
The entire suggested news industry is about keeping the many from responding to the perceived moment (reality) for the suggested captured moment (fiction).
Life leading and following towards what? Death. What's the suggestion here? If we just build a "new government" we can finally "live"? Doesn't that imply ignorance of being "alive" right now?
My biggest problem with government is corruption and wasteful management of resources.
People want to fix potholes, teach kids to read, basically everything the government is supposed to do, and tells us it is taking care of it when they’re not.
There’s about to be a huge amount of retirees in the baby boomer community, and they show that loneliness is a big factor in early death. Why not put all these boomers to work as volunteers? I know! because the boomers were the worst fucking generation that ever existed in America. Self-serving spoiled cunts.(as a percentage of the whole, i mean, 25% of boomers i know are half-ass based. Still entitled brats though)