Thomas Jefferson said when the Gov no longer protects our Rights but rather shits all over them and no matter how much we protest, they don't stop shitting all over our Rights, then it's time to Abolish Government and set up something new if we wish.
He said it is not only our Right to do this but our Duty.
This is also consider our Natural Right under Natural Law which is that our Rights come from God, Nature or Reason.
To run the new Government by the People, all we have to do is use Social Media sites like Reddit as our Town Hall. For example, if a bridge needs repair in Austin, TX, the local residents go on this board and mention the problem. They call the local repair Company. There are no taxes in the New Government so the Repair Company simply raises their funds online using crowdfunding systems such as GiveSendGo. The locals would be interested in funding such a project so that they can get to work or a friends house, ect.. using that bridge.
Our Police would be crowdfunded regularly using the same method. The Police are loyal to whoever pays them so they would be loyal to the People in this case. If they screw around, the funding is cut off.
Studies show that nobody can ever beat the American Civilians in a ground war. We have too many Arms. Our country is therefore protected as long as we keep our Arms.
Anytime anyone wants to participate in Politics, just hope on Social Media and state your concerns. This can happen in a local city sub or a general sub like this one.
We are in a serious emergency now because the Gov doesn't seem to respect the law anymore as there are plenty of Human Rights violations to name. No matter how much we beg, they don't seem to care. We can choose an official abolishment date for the future but we should consider it loosely abolished even now.
Congratulations folks. We are the New US Government now. We are all leaders and followers at the same time. Got good ideas? Spread them and if they are good, the People will use them. That's how we lead. Need our help? Ask for it. We are a team now.
What governs ment (mind)? Could it be the choice between perceived input ( needed inspiration) and suggested input (wanted information)?
How about instead of wanting to abolish choice; one questions the need to respond as choice to origin?
Nature represents balance (need/want) within movement; reason represents ignorance of perceived balance for suggested imbalance (want vs not want).
Reasoning implies responding as choice to whatever suggested one wants or not wants to reason about; while nature implies source of choice. In other words...reason implies within nature; about nature; while ignoring nature.
...what others suggest or respond to the reality perceived.
a) who controls these funds; what prevents them from being tempted to add zeros to suggested digital fiat for their own benefit?
b) life is already on the line from inception towards death; with the implied function of resisting it; not consenting to "online" suggestions.
As resistance (form) to the force/natural law of velocity (flow) what does it imply to ignore this for suggested law enforcement. Also...enforcement represents force upon mind; yet suggestion implies choice (suggests) to choice (consents) contract law.
How exactly did consent to suggested payment (paying mind) led to disloyalty among choices?
How do you enforce law upon disloyal law enforcement? Let me guess...private security forces and a military industrial complex?
...the corruption of suggested scientism under nondisclosure agreements (agreeing minds)...such studies are available at --redacted--
HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form] + RIGHT, adjective [Latin rectus, rego] - "to strain or stretch, whence straight". What if life represents the stretching of form by the flow that stretches it from inception towards death?
Can form interrupt (violation) flow? There can never be a suggested "human (form) right (flow) violation (interrupting)...only the ignorance of those within towards the perceived status quo.
NAME, noun - "sound used to express"...choice represents the expression of perceived sound (resonance); not words suggested by others (dissonance). What names does nature give to itself?
Choice implies response to balance; hence as form within the ever changing moment(um) of flow. Ignoring that which is (momentum) for that which is suggested (future) represents the abolished mind aka shirking of response-ability (choice) to perceived reality (balance).
The entire suggested news industry is about keeping the many from responding to the perceived moment (reality) for the suggested captured moment (fiction).
Life leading and following towards what? Death. What's the suggestion here? If we just build a "new government" we can finally "live"? Doesn't that imply ignorance of being "alive" right now?