It's not even that porn sites exist, but that sites that market to children such as facebook, twitter, and reddit allow porn on their platforms too. And public libraries have no internet filter either. Even a lot of web filters don't completely block all porn.
Exactly. Don't blame the government for the parents' failure. As far as I am concerned, almost everything the government touches, they fuck up. So the more hands-off, the better.
I don't think this is the parents fault, at least not solely. Its insanely difficult to raise children in an era of moral decay and degeneracy. Parents are competing against overwhelming media and social influences as well as extremely well funded industries designed to corrupt Americas youth. I'm disappointed when I hear such simple response "its the parents fault"
Not entirely. But we need to work on shaping society rather than relying on "big daddy government" to control what type of content one can consume. Its literally the exact same argument they're using to silence conservatives and COVID dissenters and its just as wrong when applied to porn.
Does this also apply to booze and cigarettes? Why is the store on the hook if they sell to a minor when the parents should be monitoring what the child consumes.
Just assuming that the majority of internet use as a kid would be from the home. One would assume the parents pay for all devices, routers and modems. Obviously kids won't always be home and you truly couldn't keep it out of reach at all times.
The parents have had no control over the upringing of their own childrem since they were forced by law to release them to the state education system when they were old enough to chant, I-swear-a-lee-gence-to-the-flag....
If I can homeschool in socialist Ontario, anyone can. Even if the state forces your children into school at gunpoint and you are prohibited from moving, you still have eight hours with them everyday plus weekends. Get to work.
Parents who let their kids watch porn (by ignoring them for the vast majority of the time) don't care about their kids or families.
Solution #1: Point this out. Porn is degenerate, unhealthy, and totally unnecessary. It's consumption is a side effect of mental trauma and/or neglect. Parents need to deal with it.
Solution #2: Shame bad parents. Parents are allowed to raise their kids, but if their kids are fucked we both can and should shame them.
Solution #3: Encourage parents to care about their kids and help them to do so. Accept that most people who had boomers as parents have no idea how families are supposed to work and need to learn.
Its easier to find hardcore porn than it is free speech platforms. Porn is more plentiful than independent media.
Also, all the major porn sites are owned by a company called "mindgeek". Porn is a pysop that is designed to slowly change the attitudes of the audience, such as: interracial porn, family porn and transsexual. I don't believe people are asking for those categories, but rather these monopolies are imposing those categories.
Pfft... We knew the government didn't care about our families when the porn was in the back section of the video store behind a bed-sheet hidden walkway, far from the minds of the religious and the prude.
Conservatives Republicans and Democrats, neo-LIbtards and their uneducated followers all love porn.
In my life, had it not been for porns, I would have never got the proper instructions for licking boxes.
Dude you’re clearly thinking with your dick right now. Imagine you had a teenage daughter aged 15. Do you really think it should be acceptable for old creeps to be perving on her? A minor, and at that age, youre very impressionable, gullible and naïve. So who knows what that could lead to.
Also, the current pornography industry already has a shit tonne of trafficking going on, the last thing you would want is to extend that shit to minors.
Naturally I'm thinking with my dick. We're talking hot naked girls playing with themselves after all.
I probably wouldn't want old men perving on any daughter of mine actually.
That's a little different from solo videos though. If millions of guys are jacking off to her that is a compliment to her. And me by extension as I sired such a noble maiden.
Dunno really what you mean by trafficking. I don't think it applies to the kind of stuff I'm talking about or posting though particularly. And you kinda need to demonstrate harm with it and give specifics as to how it is relevant to what I specifically favor.
It's not even that porn sites exist, but that sites that market to children such as facebook, twitter, and reddit allow porn on their platforms too. And public libraries have no internet filter either. Even a lot of web filters don't completely block all porn.
So now it's the government s job to monitor your kids online? Uh, it's the parents fault.
People are not consistent. They blow with the wind.
Exactly. Don't blame the government for the parents' failure. As far as I am concerned, almost everything the government touches, they fuck up. So the more hands-off, the better.
I don't think this is the parents fault, at least not solely. Its insanely difficult to raise children in an era of moral decay and degeneracy. Parents are competing against overwhelming media and social influences as well as extremely well funded industries designed to corrupt Americas youth. I'm disappointed when I hear such simple response "its the parents fault"
Not entirely. But we need to work on shaping society rather than relying on "big daddy government" to control what type of content one can consume. Its literally the exact same argument they're using to silence conservatives and COVID dissenters and its just as wrong when applied to porn.
Does this also apply to booze and cigarettes? Why is the store on the hook if they sell to a minor when the parents should be monitoring what the child consumes.
Just assuming that the majority of internet use as a kid would be from the home. One would assume the parents pay for all devices, routers and modems. Obviously kids won't always be home and you truly couldn't keep it out of reach at all times.
The parents have had no control over the upringing of their own childrem since they were forced by law to release them to the state education system when they were old enough to chant, I-swear-a-lee-gence-to-the-flag....
Nope, no excusing laziness or cowardice.
If I can homeschool in socialist Ontario, anyone can. Even if the state forces your children into school at gunpoint and you are prohibited from moving, you still have eight hours with them everyday plus weekends. Get to work.
How does that prevent them watching hardcore porn with all the other kids at school? It only takes one kid with a phone.
I don't know parent your children better.
Doesn't it?
Parents who let their kids watch porn (by ignoring them for the vast majority of the time) don't care about their kids or families.
Solution #1: Point this out. Porn is degenerate, unhealthy, and totally unnecessary. It's consumption is a side effect of mental trauma and/or neglect. Parents need to deal with it.
Solution #2: Shame bad parents. Parents are allowed to raise their kids, but if their kids are fucked we both can and should shame them.
Solution #3: Encourage parents to care about their kids and help them to do so. Accept that most people who had boomers as parents have no idea how families are supposed to work and need to learn.
Bull, today we handle parents with kitten gloves. Parents today are irresponsible and shouldn't have had children to begin with.
"Allowed"... you'll eventually figure out that people in "government" facilitate the distribution of it in the first place. It's a weapon.
I dont expect them to care about me I expect them to leave me alone and keep the borders closed.
Its easier to find hardcore porn than it is free speech platforms. Porn is more plentiful than independent media.
Also, all the major porn sites are owned by a company called "mindgeek". Porn is a pysop that is designed to slowly change the attitudes of the audience, such as: interracial porn, family porn and transsexual. I don't believe people are asking for those categories, but rather these monopolies are imposing those categories.
Pfft... We knew the government didn't care about our families when the porn was in the back section of the video store behind a bed-sheet hidden walkway, far from the minds of the religious and the prude.
Conservatives Republicans and Democrats, neo-LIbtards and their uneducated followers all love porn.
In my life, had it not been for porns, I would have never got the proper instructions for licking boxes.
If you're going to promote your own articles, at least write good ones.
Go to a middle school and ask:
___ girl(s) ___ cup(s).
Anyone who answers 2,1 has a traumatized perception of the inherent dignity of human life and also the value of what a dollar can buy.
I am proud to say that i stayed with mostly normal porn
There is nothing normal about voyeurism
Says who?
The government shouldn't care porn is covered by the first amendment. Banning it is against free of speech.
An I'm also part of that generation, an guess what I'm fine because my parents, were parents.
No.
Dullwitted then or just stupid?
You guys think you're going to convince me with personal attacks?...
Dude you’re clearly thinking with your dick right now. Imagine you had a teenage daughter aged 15. Do you really think it should be acceptable for old creeps to be perving on her? A minor, and at that age, youre very impressionable, gullible and naïve. So who knows what that could lead to.
Also, the current pornography industry already has a shit tonne of trafficking going on, the last thing you would want is to extend that shit to minors.
Naturally I'm thinking with my dick. We're talking hot naked girls playing with themselves after all.
I probably wouldn't want old men perving on any daughter of mine actually.
That's a little different from solo videos though. If millions of guys are jacking off to her that is a compliment to her. And me by extension as I sired such a noble maiden.
Dunno really what you mean by trafficking. I don't think it applies to the kind of stuff I'm talking about or posting though particularly. And you kinda need to demonstrate harm with it and give specifics as to how it is relevant to what I specifically favor.