43
Comments (13)
sorted by:
3
d5f3 3 points ago +3 / -0

Saw it on substack a couple of days ago, very cool stuff.

The math is similar to what Norman Fenton showed on The HighWire about a month ago, and it basically explains how something that shouldn't work mechanistically appears to work in real life. In my mind, that Canadian video about a botched Pfizer study + this explanation of math completely destroys the "effective" part in the "safe and effective" mantra.

2
KiloRomeo [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was doing similar probabilistic analysis and kept feeling like I should sit down and publish something. Need to be more proactive - not just gripe online lol.

Fortunately they stepped up and got this out

2
Mrexreturns 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can't vax anything that outright doesn't exist out of the imagination of depraved revolutionary killers.

The vax is to serve as false hope and distraction before they REALLY go for the kill.

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

can't vax anything that outright doesn't exist out of the imagination...

What if suggesting the many to consent to VAC'CINE, adjective [Latin vaccinus, from vacca, a cow.] tricks them to behave as such; hence becoming herdable?

2
BloodShallReign 2 points ago +2 / -0

You accusing the lying cunt weasel of lying? Oh my.

2
factdigger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Prof Norman Fenton of bayesian statistical inference came to the same conclusion about vaccine avoided deaths independently:

https://probabilityandlaw.blogspot.com/

2
KiloRomeo [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Took me a minute to track it down. You’re right - he even shows the characteristic bump after the dose. It’s the same shape and the offset is two weeks which matches previous evidence. confirmation from multiple sources is a good sign
https://probabilityandlaw.blogspot.com/2021/12/possible-systematic-miscategorisation.html?m=1

2
MindlessRationality 2 points ago +2 / -0

They have been doing this on every single study. They make the errors all Bucketed into the unvaxxed....

Hercules paradox....everywhere. every time.

*Edit - Simpson Paradox

1
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is the Hercules paradox?

1
MindlessRationality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry - my brain fucked up - I was pulling it from memory - it's actually the Simpson paradox

1
KiloRomeo [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be fair, title should read “vaccines could have 0 efficacy”. This doesn’t prove they don’t (though I’m skeptical) but it does prove they don’t have to in order to get the results of analysis we’ve seen from fauci/nih/cdc

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

0 efficacy

EF'FICACY, noun [Latin efficax.] - "power to produce effects"...does suggested 0 (nothing); suggested by ONE (something) within ALL (everything) have the power to produce effects?