Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

43
Vaccines have 0 efficacy. Fauci analysis committed math and data crimes to lie about efficacy. (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 3 years ago by KiloRomeo 3 years ago by KiloRomeo +43 / -0
13 comments download share
13 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (13)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– d5f3 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Saw it on substack a couple of days ago, very cool stuff.

The math is similar to what Norman Fenton showed on The HighWire about a month ago, and it basically explains how something that shouldn't work mechanistically appears to work in real life. In my mind, that Canadian video about a botched Pfizer study + this explanation of math completely destroys the "effective" part in the "safe and effective" mantra.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– KiloRomeo [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I was doing similar probabilistic analysis and kept feeling like I should sit down and publish something. Need to be more proactive - not just gripe online lol.

Fortunately they stepped up and got this out

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– KiloRomeo [S] 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Worth the read: https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/bayesian-datacrime-defining-vaccine

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Mrexreturns 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Can't vax anything that outright doesn't exist out of the imagination of depraved revolutionary killers.

The vax is to serve as false hope and distraction before they REALLY go for the kill.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

can't vax anything that outright doesn't exist out of the imagination...

What if suggesting the many to consent to VAC'CINE, adjective [Latin vaccinus, from vacca, a cow.] tricks them to behave as such; hence becoming herdable?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BloodShallReign 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

You accusing the lying cunt weasel of lying? Oh my.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– KiloRomeo [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Took me a minute to track it down. You’re right - he even shows the characteristic bump after the dose. It’s the same shape and the offset is two weeks which matches previous evidence. confirmation from multiple sources is a good sign
https://probabilityandlaw.blogspot.com/2021/12/possible-systematic-miscategorisation.html?m=1

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MindlessRationality 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

They have been doing this on every single study. They make the errors all Bucketed into the unvaxxed....

Hercules paradox....everywhere. every time.

*Edit - Simpson Paradox

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SuicideTruthbomber 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

What is the Hercules paradox?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MindlessRationality 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Sorry - my brain fucked up - I was pulling it from memory - it's actually the Simpson paradox

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– KiloRomeo [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

To be fair, title should read “vaccines could have 0 efficacy”. This doesn’t prove they don’t (though I’m skeptical) but it does prove they don’t have to in order to get the results of analysis we’ve seen from fauci/nih/cdc

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

0 efficacy

EF'FICACY, noun [Latin efficax.] - "power to produce effects"...does suggested 0 (nothing); suggested by ONE (something) within ALL (everything) have the power to produce effects?

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy