What makes you do good things? Making "the right" choice, Having a positive(?) thought.
There needs to be a push from a balanced (that is in balance) reference point(?) of being/state of mind. Push towards the positive(?) (omnidirectional/infinite). Well most certainly it depends on which frame you choose, from where you look.
The realization simply being the acknowledgement of the existence of good. The potential. Hey, there's a possibility of/for good.
Does anyone practice/does breathwork/yoga/etc? Tounge on the palate and breathing modes/techniques to control the energy works best for me.
Re- implies in response to; hence out of. New implies coming into being through change; hence change (flow) being the prerequisite for anything to come out of. How would you describe "new" energy?
Aka as form within the momentum of flow.
Picking at temporary form within ongoing flow; hence being able to shape corruption by choice.
The ignorance of the many towards the system they set their choices into is what allows the few the racketeer the ongoing corruption of every form set into flow. Notice that the parasitic few are alleged to be destroyers; not creators; letting others work for something; instead of doing it themselves. What the many lack to understand is that the few nonstop shaping the self destruction of the many by suggestion...which works for the few. All the few suggest represents the theatrical story of human progress; which deceives the many who playact in it; to ignore resisting progress for their own self sustenance.
In short...the few deceive the many to perceive ongoing flow as the affixed stage of civilization; while behind the ignored scenes; flow is continuing to bring temporary chaos back into the natural order. It's not that the few are destroying every civilization they infest; it's that they exploit the ignorance of the many to build an hold onto form; while being flushed by flow. Their sleight of hand for that is "the house build on sand" aka a formation that ignores momentum of flow.
That represents you consenting to the suggested information "knowledge"; while ignoring that knowledge represents perceived inspiration. Perceived reality cannot be withheld from others; suggested fiction can; because one consented to want it as a suggestion from another one.
Knowledge represents perceived inspiration; truth represents wanted information (lies represent not wanted information) and wisdom represents wise (discernment of choice) and dominance (balance). Try putting the connotations of these terms into your understanding of the river.
The access of the few represents control over how much each ONE of the many consents to ignore of ALL offered. Suggested money represents the main culprit here; because it deceives those consenting to it; to ignore ONEs choice based evaluation of ALL perceived value (reality) for a suggested value (fiction), defined by another ONE. Self devaluation of choice based response to balance.
That's yet another sleight of hand for forms (masses) ignorance (un-) of flow (washed).
Which implies that they already took aka consent to speak suggested languages; within which they complain about being controlled; which then allows those suggesting to shut them up. Hate-speech only works if one consents to suggested speech first; which implies consenting to others defining meaning; and those who gained the power to define meaning; will redefine it at their will and by the consent of all those who agreed to let others define meaning for them.
Those who ignore perceived sound are at will of those who suggest words shaped out of sound aka being played by fiction within an ignored reality.
Control aka power over...velocity represents power incoming; resistance represents power responding to incoming by choice based adaptation to balance.
How to corrupt control over choice towards perceived balance? By suggesting choices so that choice consents to ignore balance; for whatever choices are suggested. The ONE lever of control represents the choice of need or want within ALL. Velocity pushes the lever; hence causing the need for resistance; while everything surrounding one is tempting (hence pulling) the lever towards ignoring needed resistance for wanted ignorance.
TRADI'TION, noun [Latin traditio, from trado, to deliver.] ALL is being delivered to each ONE; and choice can shape out of it. The only tradition is flow for the responding form within; hence delivering that which remains of form within flow (blood) from one to another (bloodline).
CONDUCT, noun [Latin, to lead] aka a suggested deception from the status quo of form being led by flow from inception towards death. Form represents the magnetic resistance to the electric velocity of flow.
Perception represents electric velocity (flow); comprehension represents growth of magnetic resistance (form).
Flow/form already represents the balance (momentum); which those within have to align (resonate) both mental/physical response aka mentally resisting to ignore need for want; while physically adapting to need. The difference represents "I'm totally gonna do it...later"
Yep...mental temptation and physical temptation. The mental temptation aims at those with growing comprehension to also ignore balance for origin (energy) instead of for suggested outcome (death). Understanding the ONEness of ALL (energy) also tempts the ignorance of being ONE within ALL aka responsibility of choice within temporary momentum; not mentally jerking yourself off over representing infinity of energy. This is where suggested Buddhism; meditation; self intoxication etc. are used as mental temptations. Your sitting on the mountain example represents that being above physical temptation; yet tempted to fall for the mental ones.
Great rhetoric...vote (choice) count (ignorance of being the ONE with the choice for counting others). Hilarious. Meanwhile on MSM: "vote counting irregularities?"..."Let's check dominion!"
Within the chain of command you represent an order follower; hence being in ignorance of representing the resistance to the natural order of velocity. It's hard to adapt to inspiration while simultaneously perpetuating suggested information and responding to those corrupted by it.
Mind of the students...throw it; paint it; break it; protect it; steal them all; leverage it; sneak out; how do I not fail this; lets work together and lay out a message; if elephants hold each others tails; do they fart in each others faces...
Those who want are tempted to want more. Their perceived way is towards outcomes and neither goalpost will satisfy them long; because they're going with the flow instead of resisting it within balance. They look towards death and any temporary form that can distract them from it is wanted; but never helps to avoid the ongoing outcome. The ignored need is where they are; but how could they grow within balance if they run after the temptations of loss? A more and more desperate situation; hence the want for any special achievement to "matter"; while lacking to understand that they always mattered (form).
If one consents to suggested captured moments; one corrupts understanding of what the momentum (balance) has to offer, as well as the need to respond to it by breathing (spiro; spirit) aka choice based resistance to incoming velocity.
Both represent choice of wanted outcomes (length of stay) over needed habitation. Your momentary surrounding within will inspire adaptation to need for preparedness (cold season).
I like that...short term usage of brands; while honoring ongoing flow; yet use of suggestion implies a trust contract between choices; which isn't honorable to balance.
Memento - "remember"; also "commemoration of death" aka ignoring that which is for the which was....boxed as a temptation waiting to be opened.
ONE implies within the momentum of velocity; hence separated from ALL into form within flow. Velocity just moves; momentum represents responding resistance to momentum (balance). Does the surfer mimic the water or does he pass it along?
Here's the parasitic sleight of hand for female resistance (ONEs form) to male velocity (ALL flow)... https://pic8.co/sh/n9gRGz.jpg
Knowledge represents the ongoing flow of inspiration towards each forms perception. Knowledge doesn't represents a sharing issue; but a balanced offering. Each ONE knows ALL...only within ALL offered knowledge can ONE grow understanding out of it.
As for sharing understanding...question how one got what he then suggests to others? It was choice adapting to perceived inspiration; and passing it along by suggestion undermines the choice of others by deceiving them to ignore perceived (need) for suggested (want). That's why our good intentions of "sharing is caring" are corrupting us and why the parasitic few are educating us through suggestion.
The suggested parasite inversion for that is "ask and you shall receive"; which suggests choice to choice (information); yet represents balance/choice (inspiration) for those with eyes to see. The choice of others run out of information quick; but balance will always offer inspiration for those who ask aka re-quest aka respond to search within.
The blueprint implies wanted outcome; reality already represents ALL potentiality offered to each ONE within. Going at the box of legos grows you; using a suggested blueprint corrupts your growth.
To want from others represents shaping sameness; while ignoring that all the others represent perceived differentiation as inspiration for ones responding choice. And this tempts then to blame the suggested materials; not the choice to ignore perceived inspiration. Differences need to be expressed; not suppressed by mixing them together; hence the parasites suggesting the one world government for all others; while themselves understanding the ONEness of ALL (energy).
Each ONE represents an expanding ecosystem; with shared needs of maintenance; hence the overlap when fertilizing the surrounding soil of ALL for ONEs seed of growth potential. Better implies the choice of growth of self (need) or better than others (want); the rest (farming tips; people; soil and weather) represents circumstances within the ever changing moment(um). The choice matters (form); while the rest is ongoing (flow).
Balance is in motion; hence responding choice in demanded responsibility. Being from implies trying self sustenance within flow; hence wanting to not choose representing ignoring need. ALL flow is what gets each ONE done...choice within balance (growth/loss) defines how long getting done will take.
I read the flow used to shape the words for inspiration...energy to flow to form to sound to response (resonance or dissonance) by choice; to choice to shape words (dissonance); to choice to suggest words as meaning towards choice of others; while using rhetoric to obfuscate sound. Every word has a track record...
https://pic8.co/sh/amtGtj.jpg
Call empty (choice of evaluation); are full (suggestion of value); most people (response in the name of others). Was any of that needed for breathing air?
As deep as momentum aka the vessel that holds ONE within ALL.
Speed represents your evaluation of incoming inspiration aka counting the ongoing...you don't have to. Let inspiration fly by; while concentrating on the momentum for your choices at which point you utilize whatever inspiration that stands out; which is how you train your consciousness to drawn more connections for whatever you choose.
Counting speed doesn't represent resistance to velocity.
ONE represents the responding process to ALL...other ONEs represent inspiration/temptation; not obligation for regurgitation. Whatever you do already represents ONE expression of ALL for all others. Then don't need to understand you; they will mimic you as inspiration anyway (monkey see; monkey do). If you adhere to balance; they will mimic balance in accordance to their own potential of understanding. Meanwhile; your growth of potential will increase the resistance to those who use you as temptation to cause imbalance, and you will therefore be more efficient in resisting.
The remembering aspect represents holding onto inspiration as information (by counting) and then reasoning about the use of the information (stagnation); while ignoring the ongoing inspiration (adaptation).
The ongoing natural order (flow) causes balance (momentum) for the temporary chaos (form) within. You try to improve the quality of explaining order to chaos...aka polishing turds.
Order communicates balance to chaos by movement as perceivable inspiration; for the highest value in existence to respond to...free will of choice. ALL value is delivered to each ONE evaluation without a word...
Form represents the processed post within flow.
Aka tumbled (flow) in a drum (momentum) with a fistful of ball-bearings (all the other form).
Awareness to resonance can be grown; like "reading a room" just by entering. For me its about body language; while others told me about being able to discern moot from sound or even colorful auras.
Growth (form) is within loss (flow); yet choice of form to process flows offering is where the potential of vinegar operates.
Together (energy); breaking apart (flow causing form aka self differentiation); to break apart (form in response to flow aka transmutation out of base).
Corruption implies perceivable; hence as form (chaos) out of flow (order)...that's where it matters as inspiration for form to sustain self or as temptation to ignore doing so.
The entire beast system is suggested; hence wanted; therefore in ignorance of need. The few simply respond parasitically to the weakness of ignorance among the host many...aka host/parasite; a tool of balance for the responding choice within. Happy merchants of temptation...
That's the wanted exploitation of a host; but before that comes the needed self sustenance...both (need/want) represent choices responsibility to balance aka a response to being processed for growth and loss. Contribution implies form judging other form about behavior.
Ask yourself if self sustenance represents a contribution for form within flow or a responsibility? The former tempts to want outcomes (payment for contribution); the latter would make maintenance of ones surrounding a needed responsibility; hence lowering the temptation of everything around us by growing our resistance to it.
Which isn't against the parasites; but for self sustenance by adaptation to ever changing circumstances within momentum. Both learn from that.
How would you understand which weakness of yours is tempting others? How would others understand how to leech from a host?
By those who grew their comprehension thereof...not so much by those whose gardening skills amount to watching grass grow; while having a Mexican on speed-dial if uneven growth is inconveniencing the optics.
...to those who chose want over need to be able to consider to want or not want what they sell. Sages and scientist also already imply consent to those titles and the umbrella idols above them. Selling itself implies ignoring to be ONE being offered ALL for use to sustain self.
A response to ignored responsibility of choice to balance aka consenting to others implies ignoring oneself. We already share reality...what's there to consent to? Consider breeding...without consent; would it happen? Self sustenance is needed; so it's gonna go down anyway. The issue is that violation of will is being suggested to get the consent corruption going. Will needs to respond for self; not against others.
Insistence implies the use of frequency when suggesting submission; which only works when one ignores that consent to suggestion represents submission of will to will. Those who insist are either aware of the weakness; hence utilizing persistent frequency; or domesticated enough by others to perpetuate it.
Example...racism as an accusation. The few are aware that the many will submit to being accused of by defending themselves against it; hence affirming the suggested idol of racism. Meanwhile among the ignorant many...accusations are being wielded blindly against others to protect ones own ignorance from responsibility acting up aka fault within self reflected as accusations against others.
Responsibility (contract of choice to balance) of self sustenance through growth (tree).
Question the just. Why does flow (velocity) differentiate you into form (resistance)? To balance ongoing flow with temporary growth...like growing understanding of form through adaptation to perception through flow. You know ALL the river has to offer; but what you make out of yourself in it is based on your choice.
Does a seed show any indication of being intimidated by the soil offered or does it express exponential growth; while utilizing every aspect of the soil for self sustenance? Think from the perspective of an ecosystem radiating outwards...that's your growth potential; your responsibility to everything around you. Ask yourself how potentiality offered can intimidate the potential within to restrict growth?
What if ALL represents inspiration to each ONE for growth, while others suggest temptation to feel intimidated by everything? What if suggesting starvation tempts to ignore exponential fruits of labor? What if suggesting loss into nothingness tempts one to ignore growth out of everything? What if suggesting overpopulation or depopulation tempts one to ignore being within balance? What if suggesting exponentially increasing numbers (debt) and decreasing numbers (worth) tempts one to ignore the only number that matters within ALL...ONEself? How can one grow if he counts others? How can one respond to balance when he follows choices? How could one adhere to momentum if he remembers captured moments?
Who has a problem with all those miles? The "Proclaimers" thereof aka those who claim what is; while ignoring to grow what they already are instead? "When I wake up, well, I know I'm gonna be" aka I perceive that I am; yet..."But I would walk five hundred miles; And I would walk five hundred more;Just to be the man who walked a thousand miles" aka I perceive that I am; yet I want to be anything but what I am.
Was constant energy suddenly presented to you or was it already there? Surprise represents temporary response to the constant offering. How often can you steal your sons nose before he understands what you're up to? Eventually his potential grows and instead of being surprised he adapts and get your nose too.
Driftwood implies processed by flow; playing implies choice to respond to being moved. Utilize choice; build a raft; grow potential of choice; build a boat...shape (choice) driftwood (form within flow) for self sustenance.
https://ahdictionary.com/word/indoeurop.html ...got any better ones (older; cleaner; downloadable)?
To see implies ONE perceiving ALL; discernment implies growing understanding of being ONE within ALL; choosing to look represents perceiving the differentiation of the same as inspiration within temptation. The more one grows understanding; the more of ALL each ONE differentiation expresses.
I got it rougher...worked within; while protected by the beast; stepped on the wrong toes; got kicked out, and only then got inspired to question the who; where and why of what just happened.
Tempting consent to narrow ones own view by self imposed beliefs in mental restrictions. Why use unrestricted choice when others suggest me choices within restricted boundaries...why does me pointing this out sound less tempting than when others suggest it?
"I can't breathe" leads to death...any yet the majority consents to reason about breathing; while breathing. Is this really a "pay no heed" suggestion or are they just mercilessly rubbing our faces into our own ignorance with a sprinkle of cognitive dissonance added; just to stay under the plausible deniability clause?
The temptation to count the movement; by first branding everything within is what corrupts our understanding of the ongoing. After that the few then suggest past; present and future to distract from the momentum already ignored aka rebranding memories; while attaching corrupt meaning through suggestion.
Way simpler...the initial consent of choice to suggested choice exchanges understanding of sole authority over self (free will of choice) with submission to the will of others (their choice). At this point everything suggested represents an idol of authority with its own chain of command growth of corruption.
The simplicity represents want over need aka suggested choices over perceived balance; afterwards any suggestion adds complexity upon it; building by itself the same hierarchy; the same chain of command under false authority; the same pyramid scheme.
Also; having consented (want) to any suggestion; doesn't require the explanation thereof to hold up; because the conflict of reason (want vs not want) between both consenting sides will distract those who consent from those who suggest. And what does one do while reasoning about meaning of suggestion? One makes up endless more suggestions of why the suggested meaning means what one believes it means. There is your self perpetuating "comprehensive web of suggestion".
They all use assumptions upon suggested information; instead of upon perceived information through the foundation of natural law (flow to form). House of cards...the few tempt them by suggestion to keep building; while using stagecraft to sell them on the destruction of the collapsing cards (aka the civilization racket). The world's a stage they say...
Besides accidents; a certain type of skill-set is required to survive such an environment; which includes reading others.
Differences within potential imply form; the real current represents the potentiality of flow. The unit of electromotive force (volt) implies the resting force that can measure it; hence within form.
Is to is "less" represents loss of ALL potentiality; is less to is represents growth of ONEs potential. Both together represent balance (loss/growth) aka inherent power of velocity/resistance.
Perceivable voltage is based by us generating the current to measure it aka our movements in response to being moved. Balance (momentum) is what we ignore; hence being separated within the electric current; using magnetic resistance to channel it through each individual ONE into the momentum for self sustenance.
Comprehensible voltage aka electromotive force represents the velocity aspect of energies inherent balance aka the loss form ALL into the internal ONE; which in return causes the growth of ONE towards the external ALL.
Needed self sustenance, eh?
As simple as form within flow representing responsibility of choice within balance.
Individually (blood) and collectively (bloodline).
Learn/teach yourself about pockets. Whenever you lose something; add another pocket within one of your pockets and put the replacement into it.
Perception (knowledge); Comprehension (understanding). Not knowing represents lack to comprehend perceived knowledge; based on consenting to suggested information branded as "knowledge". Meanwhile comprehending knowledge (to know one knows) represents awareness of growth potential.
Seeking answers from choices instead of representing the responding answer to the question of balance...choice.
Seeking suggested spirits over perceived spirit (spiro; to breathe)...something to ponder over when feeling short of breathe in a bar fight. That's when the philosophical output goes as for as "empty bottles; yet full of potential".
Trademarked indeed. I thought consenting to ignore evaluation (choice) for suggested value (money) was the bottom of ignorance; but consent to the copyright of "intellectual property" allowed me to INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand) that the bottom of ignorance also represents ALL potentiality offered; even to the ONEs ignoring it.
As if finite struggle within infinite isn't demanding enough...temptation of infinite ignorance.
ONEs growth stems from needed momentum; not from wanted outcomes. Money suggests self sustenance as the outcome for compliance to self destruction.
Ignorance of responsibility as choice to balance (reality) for dependence to suggested choices of imbalance (fiction)...a fiction neatly packaged as enter-tame-mind as to sustain ignorance.
What if blood represents the fire; and you represent the kindling burning away; while you breathe as resistance (form) to the velocity coming in (flow)? How do you scam the ONEness (universe) of ALL by low effort sustenance of ONEself?
Also scam out of what? Spirits for spirit aka just one more sip for one less breathe?
"I keep the ends out for the tie that binds...Because you're mine (flow), I walk the line (form)"
The frequency of flow INSIST's, verb intransitive [Latin insisto; in and sisto, to stand.] form within its momentum; hence no rest for the WICKED, adjective [to depart, to fall away.]
It's the frequency of others insisting what they want or not want one to do; which represents the temptation to ignore being already insisted as form within flow.
Yep. Suggested choices as substitute questions to the questioning balance for the answering choice. Here we have mass ignorance; yet suggesting questions tempts to ignore answers...
Balance (flow); Maypole (form)...if balance is a maypole; where does the maypole balances in?`
a) if knowledge represents perception; then how to perceive nothingness?
b) if I can define absolute; then why is there so much different everything around me?
c) it translates to "I perceive (know) everything (absolutely) nothing".
There's everything (ALL flow) and every thing in it (formed ONEs). ONE (choice) represents responsibility to perceived ALL (balance); not to the choices of everyone else suggested. "driven me" implies ignoring being driven as form within flow; hence driving oneself bonkers over others.
Before choice can respond to any other wanted or not wanted choice (want vs not want); it needs to respond to balance (need/want).
It grows instead of reasoning about into what...not towards the sun (choice of evaluation); but in adherence to what the sun offers (perceived value).
Ant: "hey psst...wanna hear the latest?"
Plant: "totally; let me just quickly grow back down there..."
Hiding in the shadows from the sun...
Then we would've grown our skill of adaptation by utilizing implication (if/then); instead of diminishing it by reasoning over blue vs red helmets.
Great rhetoric for ignorance...cessation of motion within the momentum of motion.
What if each ONE combination can only be shaped out of the same ALL (energy) aka what if differentiation is within equal? What are the implications of ignoring this for suggested ultimate equal outcomes (order out of chaos)?
What if form represents the main product of flow; and its ability represents growth within loss?
A sleight of hand for "a name for what?" aka pro (for) noun (name) in response to "what's your name?"
A suggested idol; a suggested narrative; suggested by the few to the many. How can one proclaim to the many without the infrastructure of the few to do so? The few understand the differences between perceived sound and suggested words; while using the latter to masquerade the former.
How to corrupt implication (if/then)? Suggest it to be within reasoning (want vs not want) aka within conflict instead of balance.
Consider the difference between figuring the suggested "it all" out, and growing ONEs comprehension out of the perceived ALL? Can ONE figure out ALL he/she's responding to?
Figuring out suggested lyrics; or adapting to perceived sound?
What if the real river (flow) only opens up to the ones within (perception) by them growing roots (comprehension); instead of the rootless pursuit of suggested fun within the puddle of ignored potential?
Rootless (with the flow) or rooted (resisting the velocity of flow)...want or need. If rooted vs rootless represents want vs not want; then what would represent need? Is choice rooted within balance; or is it rootless?
The few use the allegory of the "Library of Alexandria" as the analog book-burning narrative; while the bluntness of the digital one reflects the corruption caused among the readers; who consent to read their books on first the "Kindle"; then on the "Kindle Fire"...instead of Ninjas they use Yokozuna wearing groucho marx masks.
More marketable represents less resistance to suggestion. The "success" of the few represents the downgrading of resistance among the many.
Need (important); balance (simple); hard (responsibility of choice).
How can pulling (by choice) on a suggestion (by choice) lead towards balance; when choice represents the response to balance?
Quick fingers avoid multiple pockets...
Reason represents the response to suggestion (want over need); while reasoning (want vs not want) resulting in suggestions (want to more want) represents the perpetuation of the initial ignorance.
That implies thinking in suggested terms (words; brands; idolized meaning) aka the ego of suggested information upheld within memory. We are being suggested that responding with the correct information makes us smart; when we ignore the need to respond to perceived inspiration.
Processing of physical input; shaped by mental response to perceived or suggested input. What makes the gut special is that it's used to filter content; hence taking longer to physically corrupt than the brain who can be fooled into consenting to a simple suggestion.
What if the frequency of beat regulates the temptation to measure?
What if they represent pressure release by resistance to incoming velocity?
All in one aka oneness; not togetherness. TEAM, noun - "two or more horses, oxen or other beasts harnessed together to the same vehicle for drawing" Whose dream is the cattle working for...
As life being moved from inception towards death...how does one pin down ones owns inception and death? Only comprehension of perceived movement allows that; hence not pinning down; but responding as choice to a balance caused by movement; by velocity; by current.
Comprehension cannot be shared by suggestion; it has to be grown by ONEself out of ALL. I can tell you that you're within movement; but only you can grow understanding of being moved...not to be mistaken by believing me that you are within movement. That represents consent to suggested choice; not comprehension of perceived balance and the source thereof.
Potential implies loss/growth; hence represents balance (momentum) for responding choice (form). Flow represents the potentiality that causes the momentum aka everything (ALL) that causes something (ONE) within itself. The electrical current suggested to us is measured within momentum aka among form; not out of flow.
Potential (choice) responds to balance (need/want); hence balancing within. Both poles (aka jachin + boaz aka twin towers) are suggested. POLE, noun [Latin palus.] - "instrument for measuring".
The circumstances of resonance (growth) and dissonance (loss) to balance.
Motion communicates itself without talking to inspire those within to grow; yet those within are struggling to find the right words to talk about it...hilarious. Does form need to brand flow? What for?
Why would ALL that can be look at the loss/growth of the lesser ONE within? Perception implies response to (form to flow). What would ALL energy respond to? What does energy (Internal or inherent power) need to perceive?
Up to down; big to small represent internal differentiation (ONEs) of the same (ALL). The natural opposite of flow (velocity) represents internal form (resistance); which represents a balance (momentum) that allows free choice direction within dominating balanced direction.
Stop represents forms choice to ignore perceived inspiration (from within spirit aka moving) for suggested information (from within form aka affixed within memory). It's also the suggested word stop - "putting an end to motion" that stupefies our perception of ongoing movement. It's a distraction using measurement to trick us; like I can suggest you to throw a ball in the air and then stop its fall by catching it. Do the same with an apple; then wait a couple of weeks and try again to see that its getting inconvenient to attempt to stop what's already being moved; before your throw can mimic movement.
This is also where ignorance of momentum is being exploited by suggested past; present and future to make measurements that are used to reason "stop".
Everything (ALL) from the finite (ONE) perspective, and it also implies evaluation (choice) in response to value (balance).
That's counting of everything by first branding something in it to count; hence restricting perception of everything by suggestion of something countable. ALL already established the only ONE that matters; who has the choice to count others...yet also the responsibility to balance (need/want). Is counting to infinity needed?
Aka "in the beginning was the word"; a suggestion shaped out of perceived sound. Same with zero; a suggested point to count from aka the inversion of balance caused by everything...a balance defined as nothing (zero) through the choice of others.
Math; from root me- "to measure" ; which implies math to be suggested towards choice + MAG'IC, noun [Latin magia] - "putting into action the power of spirits" aka to deceive others to ignore representing a formed reaction to flow; hence adapting by breathing (spiro; spirit).
Always in and out of base; hence "the hill to die on" aka growth potential.
Hence more order (flow) than chaos (form); more need (balance) than want (imbalance).
All suggestions tempt to ignore the only way for form to flow.
Hence; PROTEST', verb intransitive [Latin protestor; pro and testor, to affirm it.] One needs to resist the temptation (want) to affirm suggestion by protesting it (not want); otherwise one consents to reason (want versus not want).
You put it on those you consent to suggestions from aka giving others authority to command you by suggested meaning; which you willingly follow even when reasoning against it.
When upheld information meets adaptation to perceived inspiration...suddenly all these wanted ideas turn out to be less needed than anticipated.
Aka resisting to be tempted out of momentum. Your growth will be the inspiration they can teach/learn themselves from if they choose so.
If only there was something akin to growth to gain from responsibility to struggle...could it be that the suggested extra want is what tempts one to ignore to understand ones own growth?
Allocation would imply emitting outwards the fruits of labor from ONEs ecosystem. This way it's not the temptation to share what one claims to own; but distribution of growth for expansion of self.
Let them call it bullshit; I take it as fertilizer any day.
Sailing on the "see" (perception); sailing on the "c" (comprehension); hence piracy (claiming suggested information).
What's the point? Direction; hence flow moving form from inception towards death. The same flow (direction) causes momentum (differentiation); which points out inspiration for form to choose to resist the velocity of flow (balancing).
Together (velocity/resistance aka direction/choice based balancing) they represent (for energy) and communicate (form within flow) self sustenance...the point of existence.
REF'ERENCE, noun - "a sending, dismission or direction to another for information" implies choice to choice exchange of suggested information (choice of want); which then allows the inversion thereof (not want). So referencing vs dereferencing represents yet another rebranded conflict of reason (want vs not want).
Finally; pointer de/referencing exploits the consented to ignorance of balance (want over need) to point at the substitute imbalance (want vs not want). Programming memory locations represents suggestion of these imbalance pointers (fiction over reality aka information over inspiration); and technology is utilized to automate (mimic flow) the pointing out (suggestion of information).
To program memory within technology is used to program memory within consciousness.
Forgetting in terms of memory represents corruption of upheld information; while forgetting in terms of inspiration represents corrupting memory by consenting to suggested information.
Labeling within balance; while ignoring balancing is what allows others to suggest labels. When someone suggests left or right; then the answer is "free will of choice"...not the suggested choices by others. The consequences of ignorance represent the warning for lack of responsibility; yet ignorance tempts to justify those with even more ignorance.
Re-action; which implies as ONE in response to ALL. Having that self discernment implies being evaluation in response to value. ALL value is predefined; ONE evaluates it to balance within it, and flow (value) to form (evaluation) communication implies perceived inspiration by senses. Inspiration (perception) represents ALL value; that ONEs evaluation grows potential (comprehension) out of...unless ignored.
ALL perceivable inspiration represents the data structure; while grammar represents the suggested information by another ONE that proclaims what the perceived means.
As for analyzing...a) taking apart suggested information ignores that ALL perceived inspiration is being communicated to the already differentiated ONE for growth. Question the implication to try to make another ONE smaller to grow ONEself instead of using ALL? b) analyze aka anal aka "exit only; no entry".
That's one setting the balance (work as a boat anchor) as value to evaluate wanted (heavy enough) vs not wanted (not heavy enough) outcome. Meanwhile; is the boat needed or does one use it to get easier access to water; food and shelter? That represents the balance ones choice needs to respond to; no matter what one builds on top of it. As for the anchor weight...responsibility to balance implies the choice to struggle for self sustenance; hence adding more weight instead of falling for the temptation to reason about weights.
The choice that suggests this defines it for the choice that consents to it.
Growth/loss (choice) within now; nu; new (balance); hence per (by) spective (species); which implies form in response to flow.
Adapting to momentum or to your disruption of their momentum.
Individual choice within collective balance.
Aka within the finite (form) of the infinite (flow). A sleight of hand used for that: "till infinity and beyond"
Word implies shaped by choice out of sound perceived and suggested to choice of others as meaning (information) for perceived (inspiration).
Beginning suggests creationism aka out of nothing by unquestionable creator; which represents the inversion of out of everything for ONEs responding transmutation out of ALL.
Ask yourself this...how can one within everything perceive nothing, and how can one perceive creation within everything? Did it came into existence or was it shaped out of preexisting? Suggesting "creation without creator" tempts reasoning about creator (yes or no); while ignoring that one cannot perceive creation (out of nothing); just transmutation (out of everything).
Aka want (sane) vs not want (crazy) reasoning; while ignoring the need for being insane (in sanus aka within sound). Hence INSA'NE, adjective [Latin insanus; in and sanus, sound.] + ASY'LUM, noun [Latin from Gr. safe from spoil.]
Transmutation (ONE) within Port (momentum) of ALL.
In German "Weg" implies both way "Der Weg" and away "weg damit"; hence form (growth) within flow (loss).