What makes you do good things? Making "the right" choice, Having a positive(?) thought.
There needs to be a push from a balanced (that is in balance) reference point(?) of being/state of mind. Push towards the positive(?) (omnidirectional/infinite). Well most certainly it depends on which frame you choose, from where you look.
The realization simply being the acknowledgement of the existence of good. The potential. Hey, there's a possibility of/for good.
Does anyone practice/does breathwork/yoga/etc? Tounge on the palate and breathing modes/techniques to control the energy works best for me.
Awareness to resonance can be grown; like "reading a room" just by entering. For me its about body language; while others told me about being able to discern moot from sound or even colorful auras.
Growth (form) is within loss (flow); yet choice of form to process flows offering is where the potential of vinegar operates.
Together (energy); breaking apart (flow causing form aka self differentiation); to break apart (form in response to flow aka transmutation out of base).
Corruption implies perceivable; hence as form (chaos) out of flow (order)...that's where it matters as inspiration for form to sustain self or as temptation to ignore doing so.
The entire beast system is suggested; hence wanted; therefore in ignorance of need. The few simply respond parasitically to the weakness of ignorance among the host many...aka host/parasite; a tool of balance for the responding choice within. Happy merchants of temptation...
That's the wanted exploitation of a host; but before that comes the needed self sustenance...both (need/want) represent choices responsibility to balance aka a response to being processed for growth and loss. Contribution implies form judging other form about behavior.
Ask yourself if self sustenance represents a contribution for form within flow or a responsibility? The former tempts to want outcomes (payment for contribution); the latter would make maintenance of ones surrounding a needed responsibility; hence lowering the temptation of everything around us by growing our resistance to it.
Which isn't against the parasites; but for self sustenance by adaptation to ever changing circumstances within momentum. Both learn from that.
How would you understand which weakness of yours is tempting others? How would others understand how to leech from a host?
By those who grew their comprehension thereof...not so much by those whose gardening skills amount to watching grass grow; while having a Mexican on speed-dial if uneven growth is inconveniencing the optics.
...to those who chose want over need to be able to consider to want or not want what they sell. Sages and scientist also already imply consent to those titles and the umbrella idols above them. Selling itself implies ignoring to be ONE being offered ALL for use to sustain self.
A response to ignored responsibility of choice to balance aka consenting to others implies ignoring oneself. We already share reality...what's there to consent to? Consider breeding...without consent; would it happen? Self sustenance is needed; so it's gonna go down anyway. The issue is that violation of will is being suggested to get the consent corruption going. Will needs to respond for self; not against others.
Insistence implies the use of frequency when suggesting submission; which only works when one ignores that consent to suggestion represents submission of will to will. Those who insist are either aware of the weakness; hence utilizing persistent frequency; or domesticated enough by others to perpetuate it.
Example...racism as an accusation. The few are aware that the many will submit to being accused of by defending themselves against it; hence affirming the suggested idol of racism. Meanwhile among the ignorant many...accusations are being wielded blindly against others to protect ones own ignorance from responsibility acting up aka fault within self reflected as accusations against others.
Responsibility (contract of choice to balance) of self sustenance through growth (tree).
Question the just. Why does flow (velocity) differentiate you into form (resistance)? To balance ongoing flow with temporary growth...like growing understanding of form through adaptation to perception through flow. You know ALL the river has to offer; but what you make out of yourself in it is based on your choice.
Does a seed show any indication of being intimidated by the soil offered or does it express exponential growth; while utilizing every aspect of the soil for self sustenance? Think from the perspective of an ecosystem radiating outwards...that's your growth potential; your responsibility to everything around you. Ask yourself how potentiality offered can intimidate the potential within to restrict growth?
What if ALL represents inspiration to each ONE for growth, while others suggest temptation to feel intimidated by everything? What if suggesting starvation tempts to ignore exponential fruits of labor? What if suggesting loss into nothingness tempts one to ignore growth out of everything? What if suggesting overpopulation or depopulation tempts one to ignore being within balance? What if suggesting exponentially increasing numbers (debt) and decreasing numbers (worth) tempts one to ignore the only number that matters within ALL...ONEself? How can one grow if he counts others? How can one respond to balance when he follows choices? How could one adhere to momentum if he remembers captured moments?
Who has a problem with all those miles? The "Proclaimers" thereof aka those who claim what is; while ignoring to grow what they already are instead? "When I wake up, well, I know I'm gonna be" aka I perceive that I am; yet..."But I would walk five hundred miles; And I would walk five hundred more;Just to be the man who walked a thousand miles" aka I perceive that I am; yet I want to be anything but what I am.
Was constant energy suddenly presented to you or was it already there? Surprise represents temporary response to the constant offering. How often can you steal your sons nose before he understands what you're up to? Eventually his potential grows and instead of being surprised he adapts and get your nose too.
Driftwood implies processed by flow; playing implies choice to respond to being moved. Utilize choice; build a raft; grow potential of choice; build a boat...shape (choice) driftwood (form within flow) for self sustenance.
https://ahdictionary.com/word/indoeurop.html ...got any better ones (older; cleaner; downloadable)?
To see implies ONE perceiving ALL; discernment implies growing understanding of being ONE within ALL; choosing to look represents perceiving the differentiation of the same as inspiration within temptation. The more one grows understanding; the more of ALL each ONE differentiation expresses.
I got it rougher...worked within; while protected by the beast; stepped on the wrong toes; got kicked out, and only then got inspired to question the who; where and why of what just happened.
Tempting consent to narrow ones own view by self imposed beliefs in mental restrictions. Why use unrestricted choice when others suggest me choices within restricted boundaries...why does me pointing this out sound less tempting than when others suggest it?
"I can't breathe" leads to death...any yet the majority consents to reason about breathing; while breathing. Is this really a "pay no heed" suggestion or are they just mercilessly rubbing our faces into our own ignorance with a sprinkle of cognitive dissonance added; just to stay under the plausible deniability clause?
The temptation to count the movement; by first branding everything within is what corrupts our understanding of the ongoing. After that the few then suggest past; present and future to distract from the momentum already ignored aka rebranding memories; while attaching corrupt meaning through suggestion.
Way simpler...the initial consent of choice to suggested choice exchanges understanding of sole authority over self (free will of choice) with submission to the will of others (their choice). At this point everything suggested represents an idol of authority with its own chain of command growth of corruption.
The simplicity represents want over need aka suggested choices over perceived balance; afterwards any suggestion adds complexity upon it; building by itself the same hierarchy; the same chain of command under false authority; the same pyramid scheme.
Also; having consented (want) to any suggestion; doesn't require the explanation thereof to hold up; because the conflict of reason (want vs not want) between both consenting sides will distract those who consent from those who suggest. And what does one do while reasoning about meaning of suggestion? One makes up endless more suggestions of why the suggested meaning means what one believes it means. There is your self perpetuating "comprehensive web of suggestion".
They all use assumptions upon suggested information; instead of upon perceived information through the foundation of natural law (flow to form). House of cards...the few tempt them by suggestion to keep building; while using stagecraft to sell them on the destruction of the collapsing cards (aka the civilization racket). The world's a stage they say...
Besides accidents; a certain type of skill-set is required to survive such an environment; which includes reading others.
Differences within potential imply form; the real current represents the potentiality of flow. The unit of electromotive force (volt) implies the resting force that can measure it; hence within form.
Is to is "less" represents loss of ALL potentiality; is less to is represents growth of ONEs potential. Both together represent balance (loss/growth) aka inherent power of velocity/resistance.
Perceivable voltage is based by us generating the current to measure it aka our movements in response to being moved. Balance (momentum) is what we ignore; hence being separated within the electric current; using magnetic resistance to channel it through each individual ONE into the momentum for self sustenance.
Comprehensible voltage aka electromotive force represents the velocity aspect of energies inherent balance aka the loss form ALL into the internal ONE; which in return causes the growth of ONE towards the external ALL.
Needed self sustenance, eh?
As simple as form within flow representing responsibility of choice within balance.
Individually (blood) and collectively (bloodline).
Learn/teach yourself about pockets. Whenever you lose something; add another pocket within one of your pockets and put the replacement into it.
Perception (knowledge); Comprehension (understanding). Not knowing represents lack to comprehend perceived knowledge; based on consenting to suggested information branded as "knowledge". Meanwhile comprehending knowledge (to know one knows) represents awareness of growth potential.
Seeking answers from choices instead of representing the responding answer to the question of balance...choice.
Seeking suggested spirits over perceived spirit (spiro; to breathe)...something to ponder over when feeling short of breathe in a bar fight. That's when the philosophical output goes as for as "empty bottles; yet full of potential".
Trademarked indeed. I thought consenting to ignore evaluation (choice) for suggested value (money) was the bottom of ignorance; but consent to the copyright of "intellectual property" allowed me to INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand) that the bottom of ignorance also represents ALL potentiality offered; even to the ONEs ignoring it.
As if finite struggle within infinite isn't demanding enough...temptation of infinite ignorance.
ONEs growth stems from needed momentum; not from wanted outcomes. Money suggests self sustenance as the outcome for compliance to self destruction.
Ignorance of responsibility as choice to balance (reality) for dependence to suggested choices of imbalance (fiction)...a fiction neatly packaged as enter-tame-mind as to sustain ignorance.
What if blood represents the fire; and you represent the kindling burning away; while you breathe as resistance (form) to the velocity coming in (flow)? How do you scam the ONEness (universe) of ALL by low effort sustenance of ONEself?
Also scam out of what? Spirits for spirit aka just one more sip for one less breathe?
"I keep the ends out for the tie that binds...Because you're mine (flow), I walk the line (form)"
The frequency of flow INSIST's, verb intransitive [Latin insisto; in and sisto, to stand.] form within its momentum; hence no rest for the WICKED, adjective [to depart, to fall away.]
It's the frequency of others insisting what they want or not want one to do; which represents the temptation to ignore being already insisted as form within flow.
Yep. Suggested choices as substitute questions to the questioning balance for the answering choice. Here we have mass ignorance; yet suggesting questions tempts to ignore answers...
Balance (flow); Maypole (form)...if balance is a maypole; where does the maypole balances in?`
a) if knowledge represents perception; then how to perceive nothingness?
b) if I can define absolute; then why is there so much different everything around me?
c) it translates to "I perceive (know) everything (absolutely) nothing".
There's everything (ALL flow) and every thing in it (formed ONEs). ONE (choice) represents responsibility to perceived ALL (balance); not to the choices of everyone else suggested. "driven me" implies ignoring being driven as form within flow; hence driving oneself bonkers over others.
Before choice can respond to any other wanted or not wanted choice (want vs not want); it needs to respond to balance (need/want).
It grows instead of reasoning about into what...not towards the sun (choice of evaluation); but in adherence to what the sun offers (perceived value).
Ant: "hey psst...wanna hear the latest?"
Plant: "totally; let me just quickly grow back down there..."
Hiding in the shadows from the sun...
Then we would've grown our skill of adaptation by utilizing implication (if/then); instead of diminishing it by reasoning over blue vs red helmets.
Great rhetoric for ignorance...cessation of motion within the momentum of motion.
What if each ONE combination can only be shaped out of the same ALL (energy) aka what if differentiation is within equal? What are the implications of ignoring this for suggested ultimate equal outcomes (order out of chaos)?
What if form represents the main product of flow; and its ability represents growth within loss?
A sleight of hand for "a name for what?" aka pro (for) noun (name) in response to "what's your name?"
A suggested idol; a suggested narrative; suggested by the few to the many. How can one proclaim to the many without the infrastructure of the few to do so? The few understand the differences between perceived sound and suggested words; while using the latter to masquerade the former.
How to corrupt implication (if/then)? Suggest it to be within reasoning (want vs not want) aka within conflict instead of balance.
Consider the difference between figuring the suggested "it all" out, and growing ONEs comprehension out of the perceived ALL? Can ONE figure out ALL he/she's responding to?
Figuring out suggested lyrics; or adapting to perceived sound?
What if the real river (flow) only opens up to the ones within (perception) by them growing roots (comprehension); instead of the rootless pursuit of suggested fun within the puddle of ignored potential?
Rootless (with the flow) or rooted (resisting the velocity of flow)...want or need. If rooted vs rootless represents want vs not want; then what would represent need? Is choice rooted within balance; or is it rootless?
The few use the allegory of the "Library of Alexandria" as the analog book-burning narrative; while the bluntness of the digital one reflects the corruption caused among the readers; who consent to read their books on first the "Kindle"; then on the "Kindle Fire"...instead of Ninjas they use Yokozuna wearing groucho marx masks.
More marketable represents less resistance to suggestion. The "success" of the few represents the downgrading of resistance among the many.
Need (important); balance (simple); hard (responsibility of choice).
How can pulling (by choice) on a suggestion (by choice) lead towards balance; when choice represents the response to balance?
Quick fingers avoid multiple pockets...
Reason represents the response to suggestion (want over need); while reasoning (want vs not want) resulting in suggestions (want to more want) represents the perpetuation of the initial ignorance.
That implies thinking in suggested terms (words; brands; idolized meaning) aka the ego of suggested information upheld within memory. We are being suggested that responding with the correct information makes us smart; when we ignore the need to respond to perceived inspiration.
Processing of physical input; shaped by mental response to perceived or suggested input. What makes the gut special is that it's used to filter content; hence taking longer to physically corrupt than the brain who can be fooled into consenting to a simple suggestion.
What if the frequency of beat regulates the temptation to measure?
What if they represent pressure release by resistance to incoming velocity?
All in one aka oneness; not togetherness. TEAM, noun - "two or more horses, oxen or other beasts harnessed together to the same vehicle for drawing" Whose dream is the cattle working for...
As life being moved from inception towards death...how does one pin down ones owns inception and death? Only comprehension of perceived movement allows that; hence not pinning down; but responding as choice to a balance caused by movement; by velocity; by current.
Comprehension cannot be shared by suggestion; it has to be grown by ONEself out of ALL. I can tell you that you're within movement; but only you can grow understanding of being moved...not to be mistaken by believing me that you are within movement. That represents consent to suggested choice; not comprehension of perceived balance and the source thereof.
Potential implies loss/growth; hence represents balance (momentum) for responding choice (form). Flow represents the potentiality that causes the momentum aka everything (ALL) that causes something (ONE) within itself. The electrical current suggested to us is measured within momentum aka among form; not out of flow.
Potential (choice) responds to balance (need/want); hence balancing within. Both poles (aka jachin + boaz aka twin towers) are suggested. POLE, noun [Latin palus.] - "instrument for measuring".
The circumstances of resonance (growth) and dissonance (loss) to balance.
Resisting the velocity of hunger.
Individual self sustenance (blood); collectively shared (bloodline).
Not the temptation to hold onto form; but the responsibility as choice (form) to respond to balance (flow); while resisting the temptation to fall for imbalance. There's nothing to hold onto within form; yet every form tempts just that; hence the struggle to grow (need) within loss (want).
That represents the temptation of taste (want) over quenching thirst (need). Guess what...drink while thirsty and you elevate the taste; which then tempts you to want to recreate it.
Go into any (in)convenient store...all taste (want vs not want); no thirst (need).
That represents growth potential; which needs then to be utilized to hone as a skill; not hold onto. What does "I can do karate now" imply for the daily training? The belts are suggested to corrupt that very balancing within momentum by suggesting things to want to hold onto.
Form adapting to flow by mimicking it; hence reducing friction (velocity meeting resistance).
Tying a lighter to a gummi snake could lower their eagerness. You're outnumbered if they see through this tho.
The issue with knowledge before understanding is their lack of understanding the source of knowledge (inspiration; not information). Also; perceived transmuted into comprehended is between ONE (choice) and ALL (balance); not among ONEs (suggested choices).
Life represents the temporary answer (choice) to the ongoing question (balance) of how one chooses to shape it.
That implies choice seeking answers from others suggesting questions; while ignoring to respond to the questioning balance (need/want).
HOR'IZON, noun [Gr. to bound, a limit.] aka the temptation of a perceived limit on expansion; which deceives one to a) ignore growth of self and b)seek to reach the horizon. Meanwhile; choice is bound to balance; free in choice within.
An outcry represents lack of self discernment aka wanting to be noticed over expressing ALL through ONEself.
"Welcome to the jungle, we got fun and games" aka welcoming temptation.
"We got everything you want, honey, we know the names" aka suggestion of -isms (branded idols).
"We are the people that can find whatever you may need" aka suppliers of suggested want to those who ignore need.
"If you got the money, honey, we got your disease" aka consenting to ignore evaluation (choice) for suggested value (money) causing self destruction.
The whole it's a jungle out there allegory represents outside domestication of free will by consent to suggestion.
Sound (flow to form) represents infinite inspiration for responding need and infinite temptation for ignoring want.
Momentum aka choice transmuting back to base balance.
Towards a suggested goal (want) instead of in response to balance (need). Meanwhile; EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.]...within ALL work; ONEs play of ignorance shapes dullness.
a) consent to believe any suggestion represents ignorance of free will of choice for submission to suggested choice by others.
b) velocity (flow) meeting resistance (form) causes friction; vibration; resonance and heat; hence form within flow representing a burned offering (holocaust).
Aka the ongoing (collective) within the temporary (individual) aka that which remains of form within flow.IN'TERCOURSE, noun [Latin intercursus, intercurro; inter and curro, to run.] - "silent communication or exchange" aka not as sound but as response by sound (per sonos) within sound (in sanus).
One going all in represents the suggested inversion of being ONE within ALL. What a cruel yet fitting deception to pull on a gambler aka one (form) addicted to loss (flow). Meanwhile the HOUSE, noun [Latin casa; Heb. to put on, to cover] aka momentum (balance; hence shelter for choice) always wins.
A wallet represents the ignorance to evaluate (choice) the endless value (balance) offered.
STAKE, noun [The primary sense is to shoot, to thrust, hence to set or fix.] aka setting affixed (information) into ongoing (inspiration) for want to grow.
What if ONE represents the universe (ONEness of ALL); both within perceivable momentum as well as comprehensible energy? How is it a winnable game if the highest value within ALL (balance) represents ONEs evaluation (choice) thereof?
Body/mind represent the vessel for the self (blood; liquid). Self sustenance implies both individual (blood) and collective (bloodline) self. Does the propagation of your potential (offspring) look exactly like you?
Root and reach implies to radiate outwards; which can only happen within aka as ONE within ALL; as form within flow; as choice within balance. Nothing represents the choice within everything to ignore it for the suggestion of the inversion (nothing) everything vs nothing (conflict of want vs not want) do not represent natural opposites (balance for need).
Flow gives form to sound (aka momentum; balance; resonance); responding choice shapes self within perceived sound (need/resonance or want/dissonance). Truth (want) and False (not want) represent the choice to shape the ignorance of need...a choice suggested by others.
All these represent responses (ONE) to received (ALL); while "once" implies being within momentum as form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
The question of balance demands the answer of choice; so any other suggested question needs to be utilized as inspiration to respond to balance; yet tempts to be utilized as wanted information from the choice of others (causing imbalance).
What if ONE doesn't resist the existence of everything (ALL); but the power of how it communicates itself to those within aka velocity of flow towards resistance of form? REPEL', verb transitive [Latin repello; re and pello, to drive.] - "to drive back; to force to return". Form implies driven by flow; representing the force of resistance to it; hence balancing by choice as adaptation for the sustenance of self. What one can repel by resisting represents the temptation of others; which then also attracts those that respond the same (in resonance with balance).
Take the word further apart...you represent ONE thing within every (ALL) thing, so what represents a no thing? THING, noun [The primary sense of thing is that which comes, falls or happens, like event, from Latin evenio.] Incoming implies communication by flow towards form. No also implies versus Yes (another conflict ignoring balance), so if energy represents yes; how could anything perceivable within energy represent no? Yes vs no represents agreement vs disagreement among choices aka want vs not want (reasoning)...a conflicting response to a suggestion.
Take it down as well...response. If balance; then response of choice. If you perceive; then you respond to incoming by choice (adaptation to ever changing circumstances). To respond is needed; yet acknowledging ones response ability tempts one to want or not want the implied sole responsibility over free will of choice within balance. This shirking of responsibility represents the choice of want over need; hence ignorance.
Responding to balance for the sustenance of self. Put them inside and they will seek any light source.
Aren't they into troop movements? I only ever been around domesticated capuchins...not the sneakiest bunch; still into accumulation of anything they can get away with.
That implies form within the momentum of flow; hence not a cessation of motion; but of the response to being moved aka running out of resistance until transmuted back to base velocity.
I witnessed many struggling attempts to hold breathe to prolong life; yet never successful attempts of holding breathe to end life...unless that of others by force. Also; the active force (vigor) of form within flow represents resistance; hence adaptation; hence breathing; which is why SUFFI'CIENT, adjective [Latin sufficiens.] - "enough; equal to the end proposed; adequate to wants" aka ignorance of need for temptation of want.
Con (together; with) Cernere (sift; separate) aka together yet separated aka form within the momentum of flow.
What represents energy; again implies contra; contrary to.
Where do all formed products end up? Back within base flow.
Idolatry aka the temporary suggesting affixed meaning for the ongoing to each other.
a) individual narration of collective existence.
b) ignorance of existing as temporary form within ongoing flow.
c) ONE represents the story of ALL. The story of the ONEness of ALL and each ONE within ALL represents self sustenance shaped into ignorance.
HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form] + AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.]...why would animated form chase animated form; instead of sustaining self within flow?
Why so many perceivable differences? Too much inspiration for the sustenance of self or too much temptation to want more?
Aka wanting vs not wanting others instead of sustaining self. Why does one seek the question of self within other ones?
Want won over not want...or does that simply represent the ignorance of need nonetheless?
Still want vs not want. ALL doesn't denial anything to any ONE within. Why did another hold a position that allows denial towards you? That implies a parasite exploiting a host weakness; a weakness one needs to resist to fall for.
Just one demand by ALL for ONE...need over want (self sustenance); yet for each and every choice of response within balance aka for the whole shebang of life. It's after each choice that the fruits of ones labor cause exponential growth/loss.
For the life within it represents momentum to resist in for growth or the temptation to utilize loss to move about.
Which still tempts them to want value; while ignoring the need to evaluate (choice) value (balance) by responding to it.
Inspiration leads towards responsibility. How does one respond to inspiration? Choice. Where does choice responds within? Balance. Momentum (balance) implies form being moved forwards; so there's no backwards besides the resistance to forwards. Exchange forwards with the moment(um) of existing as form within flow and you can understand that it always represents forwards. The few have a sleight of hand for that as well..."all roads lead to Rome".
That's balance taking care of imbalance within aka the consequences of falling for temptation (imbalance) bringing the whole misunderstanding (corruption of understanding based on ignorance of perceived inspiration for suggested information) back to base. He's not smart; his ignorance tempted others to be even more ignorant; which makes him king of the ignorant; hence lacking defense; while being surrounded by those who can never get enough and always want more.
DIGEST, noun [Latin, put in order.] Flow represents the natural order for form. The gut mimics this order by digesting input aka separating content; yet adapting to too many wants corrupts it as well; which is why it communicates outwards when receiving unnecessary input.
Motion communicates itself without talking to inspire those within to grow; yet those within are struggling to find the right words to talk about it...hilarious. Does form need to brand flow? What for?
Why would ALL that can be look at the loss/growth of the lesser ONE within? Perception implies response to (form to flow). What would ALL energy respond to? What does energy (Internal or inherent power) need to perceive?
I seldom even glance at usernames or what forum I'm respond to; just adaptation to inspiration keeps me in balance nonetheless.
Ignorance of that which is (momentum) for suggested information of what might be (usually sold coupled with suggested fear as well).
Set "it" aside and question communication as response (choice) to predefined (balance). The natural order (flow) causing a resonance (balance) as need for the responding choice within; while choice within balance also has dissonance to choose from (ignorance of resonance).
Perception is defined as response to moving input aka a limitation of form within flow. Understanding being ONE within ALL allow to question what ALL (everything aka energy) would need perception for?
Energy represents self sustenance through internal self differentiation (flow/form aka loss/growth). It is the mimicked energy among form within the momentum of flow; that has to emulate sameness (potentiality); hence having issues with differentiation of potential.
The road (flow); the potential difference (form); the hassle (resistance of form to velocity of flow); the fight (friction; vibration; resonance...).
UNITED NATIONS aka Unity (oneness aka same) and Nation (a people aka difference). The few are suggesting the many to mix differences into sameness...a deliberate mistake.