What makes you do good things? Making "the right" choice, Having a positive(?) thought.
There needs to be a push from a balanced (that is in balance) reference point(?) of being/state of mind. Push towards the positive(?) (omnidirectional/infinite). Well most certainly it depends on which frame you choose, from where you look.
The realization simply being the acknowledgement of the existence of good. The potential. Hey, there's a possibility of/for good.
Does anyone practice/does breathwork/yoga/etc? Tounge on the palate and breathing modes/techniques to control the energy works best for me.
Needed self sustenance, eh?
As simple as form within flow representing responsibility of choice within balance.
Individually (blood) and collectively (bloodline).
Learn/teach yourself about pockets. Whenever you lose something; add another pocket within one of your pockets and put the replacement into it.
Perception (knowledge); Comprehension (understanding). Not knowing represents lack to comprehend perceived knowledge; based on consenting to suggested information branded as "knowledge". Meanwhile comprehending knowledge (to know one knows) represents awareness of growth potential.
Seeking answers from choices instead of representing the responding answer to the question of balance...choice.
Seeking suggested spirits over perceived spirit (spiro; to breathe)...something to ponder over when feeling short of breathe in a bar fight. That's when the philosophical output goes as for as "empty bottles; yet full of potential".
Trademarked indeed. I thought consenting to ignore evaluation (choice) for suggested value (money) was the bottom of ignorance; but consent to the copyright of "intellectual property" allowed me to INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand) that the bottom of ignorance also represents ALL potentiality offered; even to the ONEs ignoring it.
As if finite struggle within infinite isn't demanding enough...temptation of infinite ignorance.
ONEs growth stems from needed momentum; not from wanted outcomes. Money suggests self sustenance as the outcome for compliance to self destruction.
Ignorance of responsibility as choice to balance (reality) for dependence to suggested choices of imbalance (fiction)...a fiction neatly packaged as enter-tame-mind as to sustain ignorance.
What if blood represents the fire; and you represent the kindling burning away; while you breathe as resistance (form) to the velocity coming in (flow)? How do you scam the ONEness (universe) of ALL by low effort sustenance of ONEself?
Also scam out of what? Spirits for spirit aka just one more sip for one less breathe?
"I keep the ends out for the tie that binds...Because you're mine (flow), I walk the line (form)"
The frequency of flow INSIST's, verb intransitive [Latin insisto; in and sisto, to stand.] form within its momentum; hence no rest for the WICKED, adjective [to depart, to fall away.]
It's the frequency of others insisting what they want or not want one to do; which represents the temptation to ignore being already insisted as form within flow.
Yep. Suggested choices as substitute questions to the questioning balance for the answering choice. Here we have mass ignorance; yet suggesting questions tempts to ignore answers...
Balance (flow); Maypole (form)...if balance is a maypole; where does the maypole balances in?`
a) if knowledge represents perception; then how to perceive nothingness?
b) if I can define absolute; then why is there so much different everything around me?
c) it translates to "I perceive (know) everything (absolutely) nothing".
There's everything (ALL flow) and every thing in it (formed ONEs). ONE (choice) represents responsibility to perceived ALL (balance); not to the choices of everyone else suggested. "driven me" implies ignoring being driven as form within flow; hence driving oneself bonkers over others.
Before choice can respond to any other wanted or not wanted choice (want vs not want); it needs to respond to balance (need/want).
It grows instead of reasoning about into what...not towards the sun (choice of evaluation); but in adherence to what the sun offers (perceived value).
Ant: "hey psst...wanna hear the latest?"
Plant: "totally; let me just quickly grow back down there..."
Hiding in the shadows from the sun...
Then we would've grown our skill of adaptation by utilizing implication (if/then); instead of diminishing it by reasoning over blue vs red helmets.
Great rhetoric for ignorance...cessation of motion within the momentum of motion.
What if each ONE combination can only be shaped out of the same ALL (energy) aka what if differentiation is within equal? What are the implications of ignoring this for suggested ultimate equal outcomes (order out of chaos)?
What if form represents the main product of flow; and its ability represents growth within loss?
A sleight of hand for "a name for what?" aka pro (for) noun (name) in response to "what's your name?"
A suggested idol; a suggested narrative; suggested by the few to the many. How can one proclaim to the many without the infrastructure of the few to do so? The few understand the differences between perceived sound and suggested words; while using the latter to masquerade the former.
How to corrupt implication (if/then)? Suggest it to be within reasoning (want vs not want) aka within conflict instead of balance.
Consider the difference between figuring the suggested "it all" out, and growing ONEs comprehension out of the perceived ALL? Can ONE figure out ALL he/she's responding to?
Figuring out suggested lyrics; or adapting to perceived sound?
What if the real river (flow) only opens up to the ones within (perception) by them growing roots (comprehension); instead of the rootless pursuit of suggested fun within the puddle of ignored potential?
Rootless (with the flow) or rooted (resisting the velocity of flow)...want or need. If rooted vs rootless represents want vs not want; then what would represent need? Is choice rooted within balance; or is it rootless?
The few use the allegory of the "Library of Alexandria" as the analog book-burning narrative; while the bluntness of the digital one reflects the corruption caused among the readers; who consent to read their books on first the "Kindle"; then on the "Kindle Fire"...instead of Ninjas they use Yokozuna wearing groucho marx masks.
More marketable represents less resistance to suggestion. The "success" of the few represents the downgrading of resistance among the many.
Need (important); balance (simple); hard (responsibility of choice).
How can pulling (by choice) on a suggestion (by choice) lead towards balance; when choice represents the response to balance?
Quick fingers avoid multiple pockets...
Reason represents the response to suggestion (want over need); while reasoning (want vs not want) resulting in suggestions (want to more want) represents the perpetuation of the initial ignorance.
That implies thinking in suggested terms (words; brands; idolized meaning) aka the ego of suggested information upheld within memory. We are being suggested that responding with the correct information makes us smart; when we ignore the need to respond to perceived inspiration.
Processing of physical input; shaped by mental response to perceived or suggested input. What makes the gut special is that it's used to filter content; hence taking longer to physically corrupt than the brain who can be fooled into consenting to a simple suggestion.
What if the frequency of beat regulates the temptation to measure?
What if they represent pressure release by resistance to incoming velocity?
All in one aka oneness; not togetherness. TEAM, noun - "two or more horses, oxen or other beasts harnessed together to the same vehicle for drawing" Whose dream is the cattle working for...
As life being moved from inception towards death...how does one pin down ones owns inception and death? Only comprehension of perceived movement allows that; hence not pinning down; but responding as choice to a balance caused by movement; by velocity; by current.
Comprehension cannot be shared by suggestion; it has to be grown by ONEself out of ALL. I can tell you that you're within movement; but only you can grow understanding of being moved...not to be mistaken by believing me that you are within movement. That represents consent to suggested choice; not comprehension of perceived balance and the source thereof.
Potential implies loss/growth; hence represents balance (momentum) for responding choice (form). Flow represents the potentiality that causes the momentum aka everything (ALL) that causes something (ONE) within itself. The electrical current suggested to us is measured within momentum aka among form; not out of flow.
Potential (choice) responds to balance (need/want); hence balancing within. Both poles (aka jachin + boaz aka twin towers) are suggested. POLE, noun [Latin palus.] - "instrument for measuring".
The circumstances of resonance (growth) and dissonance (loss) to balance.
Resisting the velocity of hunger.
Individual self sustenance (blood); collectively shared (bloodline).
Not the temptation to hold onto form; but the responsibility as choice (form) to respond to balance (flow); while resisting the temptation to fall for imbalance. There's nothing to hold onto within form; yet every form tempts just that; hence the struggle to grow (need) within loss (want).
That represents the temptation of taste (want) over quenching thirst (need). Guess what...drink while thirsty and you elevate the taste; which then tempts you to want to recreate it.
Go into any (in)convenient store...all taste (want vs not want); no thirst (need).
That represents growth potential; which needs then to be utilized to hone as a skill; not hold onto. What does "I can do karate now" imply for the daily training? The belts are suggested to corrupt that very balancing within momentum by suggesting things to want to hold onto.
Form adapting to flow by mimicking it; hence reducing friction (velocity meeting resistance).
Tying a lighter to a gummi snake could lower their eagerness. You're outnumbered if they see through this tho.
The issue with knowledge before understanding is their lack of understanding the source of knowledge (inspiration; not information). Also; perceived transmuted into comprehended is between ONE (choice) and ALL (balance); not among ONEs (suggested choices).
Life represents the temporary answer (choice) to the ongoing question (balance) of how one chooses to shape it.
That implies choice seeking answers from others suggesting questions; while ignoring to respond to the questioning balance (need/want).
HOR'IZON, noun [Gr. to bound, a limit.] aka the temptation of a perceived limit on expansion; which deceives one to a) ignore growth of self and b)seek to reach the horizon. Meanwhile; choice is bound to balance; free in choice within.
An outcry represents lack of self discernment aka wanting to be noticed over expressing ALL through ONEself.
"Welcome to the jungle, we got fun and games" aka welcoming temptation.
"We got everything you want, honey, we know the names" aka suggestion of -isms (branded idols).
"We are the people that can find whatever you may need" aka suppliers of suggested want to those who ignore need.
"If you got the money, honey, we got your disease" aka consenting to ignore evaluation (choice) for suggested value (money) causing self destruction.
The whole it's a jungle out there allegory represents outside domestication of free will by consent to suggestion.
Sound (flow to form) represents infinite inspiration for responding need and infinite temptation for ignoring want.
Momentum aka choice transmuting back to base balance.
Towards a suggested goal (want) instead of in response to balance (need). Meanwhile; EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.]...within ALL work; ONEs play of ignorance shapes dullness.
a) consent to believe any suggestion represents ignorance of free will of choice for submission to suggested choice by others.
b) velocity (flow) meeting resistance (form) causes friction; vibration; resonance and heat; hence form within flow representing a burned offering (holocaust).
Aka the ongoing (collective) within the temporary (individual) aka that which remains of form within flow.IN'TERCOURSE, noun [Latin intercursus, intercurro; inter and curro, to run.] - "silent communication or exchange" aka not as sound but as response by sound (per sonos) within sound (in sanus).
One going all in represents the suggested inversion of being ONE within ALL. What a cruel yet fitting deception to pull on a gambler aka one (form) addicted to loss (flow). Meanwhile the HOUSE, noun [Latin casa; Heb. to put on, to cover] aka momentum (balance; hence shelter for choice) always wins.
A wallet represents the ignorance to evaluate (choice) the endless value (balance) offered.
STAKE, noun [The primary sense is to shoot, to thrust, hence to set or fix.] aka setting affixed (information) into ongoing (inspiration) for want to grow.
What if ONE represents the universe (ONEness of ALL); both within perceivable momentum as well as comprehensible energy? How is it a winnable game if the highest value within ALL (balance) represents ONEs evaluation (choice) thereof?
Body/mind represent the vessel for the self (blood; liquid). Self sustenance implies both individual (blood) and collective (bloodline) self. Does the propagation of your potential (offspring) look exactly like you?
Root and reach implies to radiate outwards; which can only happen within aka as ONE within ALL; as form within flow; as choice within balance. Nothing represents the choice within everything to ignore it for the suggestion of the inversion (nothing) everything vs nothing (conflict of want vs not want) do not represent natural opposites (balance for need).
Flow gives form to sound (aka momentum; balance; resonance); responding choice shapes self within perceived sound (need/resonance or want/dissonance). Truth (want) and False (not want) represent the choice to shape the ignorance of need...a choice suggested by others.
All these represent responses (ONE) to received (ALL); while "once" implies being within momentum as form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
The question of balance demands the answer of choice; so any other suggested question needs to be utilized as inspiration to respond to balance; yet tempts to be utilized as wanted information from the choice of others (causing imbalance).
What if ONE doesn't resist the existence of everything (ALL); but the power of how it communicates itself to those within aka velocity of flow towards resistance of form? REPEL', verb transitive [Latin repello; re and pello, to drive.] - "to drive back; to force to return". Form implies driven by flow; representing the force of resistance to it; hence balancing by choice as adaptation for the sustenance of self. What one can repel by resisting represents the temptation of others; which then also attracts those that respond the same (in resonance with balance).
Take the word further apart...you represent ONE thing within every (ALL) thing, so what represents a no thing? THING, noun [The primary sense of thing is that which comes, falls or happens, like event, from Latin evenio.] Incoming implies communication by flow towards form. No also implies versus Yes (another conflict ignoring balance), so if energy represents yes; how could anything perceivable within energy represent no? Yes vs no represents agreement vs disagreement among choices aka want vs not want (reasoning)...a conflicting response to a suggestion.
Take it down as well...response. If balance; then response of choice. If you perceive; then you respond to incoming by choice (adaptation to ever changing circumstances). To respond is needed; yet acknowledging ones response ability tempts one to want or not want the implied sole responsibility over free will of choice within balance. This shirking of responsibility represents the choice of want over need; hence ignorance.
Responding to balance for the sustenance of self. Put them inside and they will seek any light source.
Aren't they into troop movements? I only ever been around domesticated capuchins...not the sneakiest bunch; still into accumulation of anything they can get away with.
That implies form within the momentum of flow; hence not a cessation of motion; but of the response to being moved aka running out of resistance until transmuted back to base velocity.
I witnessed many struggling attempts to hold breathe to prolong life; yet never successful attempts of holding breathe to end life...unless that of others by force. Also; the active force (vigor) of form within flow represents resistance; hence adaptation; hence breathing; which is why SUFFI'CIENT, adjective [Latin sufficiens.] - "enough; equal to the end proposed; adequate to wants" aka ignorance of need for temptation of want.
Con (together; with) Cernere (sift; separate) aka together yet separated aka form within the momentum of flow.
What represents energy; again implies contra; contrary to.
Where do all formed products end up? Back within base flow.
Idolatry aka the temporary suggesting affixed meaning for the ongoing to each other.
a) individual narration of collective existence.
b) ignorance of existing as temporary form within ongoing flow.
c) ONE represents the story of ALL. The story of the ONEness of ALL and each ONE within ALL represents self sustenance shaped into ignorance.
HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form] + AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.]...why would animated form chase animated form; instead of sustaining self within flow?
Why so many perceivable differences? Too much inspiration for the sustenance of self or too much temptation to want more?
Aka wanting vs not wanting others instead of sustaining self. Why does one seek the question of self within other ones?
Want won over not want...or does that simply represent the ignorance of need nonetheless?
Still want vs not want. ALL doesn't denial anything to any ONE within. Why did another hold a position that allows denial towards you? That implies a parasite exploiting a host weakness; a weakness one needs to resist to fall for.
Investing response into momentum.
Sharp or dull represent choices of response to momentum; while the transmutation back to base implies the ongoing flow.
The few who suggest "stay hungry" are tempting the many to consent to want over need; hence ignoring thirst and hunger; which will corrupt both their tastes and their self sustenance skills. Misreading words already implies ignoring perceived sound for suggested words shaped out of it. Whatever the words may suggest; they already represent miscommunication.
ONEs ecosystem radiating outwards into ALL represents that radar of perceiving senses. Losing track implies EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.] aka ignoring momentum for going with the flow.
Representing ones own diminishing sense of taste.
Aka using the suggestions of others as the justification to seek other sources for ones wants; while ignoring the need to grow ones ecosystem.
Which is why everything suggested represents affixed meaning that deceives one to mentally hold onto; which in return corrupts the comprehension of the moving river and of the need to plant roots.
Is that a thing? Arson by Monkey.
Perceived reality implies differences; hence the suggestion of words to corrupt understanding of sameness (energy). Balance represents the help for choice; not suggested choices.
a) every word suggests meaning to those who ignore perceived meaning.
b) the layer (ledge) of perception (know) implies momentum (balance) for the choice within.
GRA'TIS, adverb [Latin] - "for nothing; freely; without recompense". That represents the inversion of free-dom (free will of choice in response to dominance of balance).
Winning implies a price; which implies value; which each ONE already represents the highest value within ALL...evaluation. Of course; ignoring that everything was won; tempts to assume that nothing's winnable.
How could a man be a man without reflecting upon self when looking into the eyes of his children?
Words imply suggestion of meaning; hence ignorance of perceived meaning. Only this ignorance of want over need then allows the subsequent corruption of words as spell-craft.
Free choice within dominating balance defined by a predefined path (flowing from beginning towards end).
Was this skill noticeable before the hedgefund (you finding your way into a hedge)?
Perceivable movement requires form within a momentum; to be able to perceive how other form responds to movement. Poor water into water and question if each drop goes through others or remains ONE within ALL among others alike? If so then balance sustains the differentiation of each ONE within ALL; which would make slipping through ONE another a want (imbalance) based agreement in ignorance of need (balance). On the flipside...you could make a stew out of someone and then flush him through most formed channels; including internal organs.
a) the trap implies the suggestion of "something" out of perceived everything; branded as nothing.
b) consent to either want or "not" want (aka wanting nothing) then causes the conflict of reason (want vs not want); which represents the imbalance (want vs not want) within ignored balance (need/want).
c) let's go at yes...does movement have to defined a yes state; when it's already been perceived as moving (aka always on)? Wouldn't "look at me; I'm moving" imply "no shit; I can see that"? Both yes vs no represent the suggested rebrand of want vs not want; in ignorance of need. Any yes state we suggest implies us ignoring that whatever we proclaim as such to be moving nonetheless. Another angle...if life equals yes; then being moved from inception towards death, implies that a yes state will automatically become a no state. Shouldn't this inspire one to question the "automatic" aspect (flow)? Shouldn't any yes be branded "not yet no", and shouldn't that inspire the question of being within momentum?
PROM'ISE, noun [Latin promissum, from promitto, to send before or forward; pro and mitto, to send.] That implies flow before form; flow sending forward form. A form out of a flow implies being spend; hence transmuting from flow to form (inception) to form within flow (life) to form to flow (death). Drinking as in perceived spirit (in-spirit-ation); not suggested spirits (information). Who's holds the monopoly on liquor (besides your liver)?
Need implies self sustenance; that's what they grow in adherence to. Sunlight or substitute...they respond to self sustenance (need over want).
In today's episode "vervets" we learn about how the Tavistock Institute came up with the terms "black face" and "blue balls"...
Those narrow eyes; that sunken forehead; this long face...never trust ron perlman.
Why call it standing still when it implies balancing (adaptation by choice within momentum). Get a balance board and hold one legged stances; do footwork among uneven underbrush or switch stances on ice (rocking a baby to sleep while switching from horse stance to side lunges also works), and of course the classics (water and wind) will all help with footing.
How could the free will of choice overrule the dominance of the balance; which defines having a choice based response?
Knowledge (perception) implies power perceived as movement.
That represents want over need (information over inspiration); which ignores the moving power perceived when looking. Looking for implies want of explanation (suggested information) for what is seen (perceived inspiration); while ignoring to grow it for self (comprehension). Take the label off anything and question how and what it communicates through being moved (velocity of flow) and reacting to being moved (resistance of form)?
Then why the belts; ropes; pills; guns etc. when having the powerful will to simply check out? Suicide also represents an act of vanity in response to others, and the shirking of responsibility for the sustenance of self. The suggestion of (assisted) suicide for the alleviation of pain is based on the deception of pharmaceutical barbiturates; which corrupted the inner to outer communication of sickness by numbing the symptoms with crude-oil based drugs. When dying of pain; then the body processes the ignored (withheld) symptoms of causes. It drives the pain outwards to clean itself up; while inspiring choice to resist putting more poison in.
Base as the flowing foundation of form; acid as the formed response to flow.
Pointing away from the only point of existence...momentum (balance for choice). Their suggestion represents a want vs not want offer; hence imbalance. Consent to the suggested caveat allows those suggesting it to manipulate (dereferencor) those consenting to it.
Suggested inversion of representing animated (animal) form (human) out of animating flow.
'ARCHETYPE, noun [Gr. beginning, and form.] aka flow; which one ignores when consenting to suggestion by others which "enter tame mind".
Both and then some (ALL in ONE).
Ignorance towards you (not want over want) implies secondary choice to want over need (ignorance of balance for suggestion of imbalance).
Gate represents a suggested opening; hence the vetting processes. Teach/learn yourself to utilize perceived openings and you will notice that the vetting is only for those consenting to the suggestion thereof.
Just one demand by ALL for ONE...need over want (self sustenance); yet for each and every choice of response within balance aka for the whole shebang of life. It's after each choice that the fruits of ones labor cause exponential growth/loss.
For the life within it represents momentum to resist in for growth or the temptation to utilize loss to move about.
Which still tempts them to want value; while ignoring the need to evaluate (choice) value (balance) by responding to it.
Inspiration leads towards responsibility. How does one respond to inspiration? Choice. Where does choice responds within? Balance. Momentum (balance) implies form being moved forwards; so there's no backwards besides the resistance to forwards. Exchange forwards with the moment(um) of existing as form within flow and you can understand that it always represents forwards. The few have a sleight of hand for that as well..."all roads lead to Rome".
That's balance taking care of imbalance within aka the consequences of falling for temptation (imbalance) bringing the whole misunderstanding (corruption of understanding based on ignorance of perceived inspiration for suggested information) back to base. He's not smart; his ignorance tempted others to be even more ignorant; which makes him king of the ignorant; hence lacking defense; while being surrounded by those who can never get enough and always want more.
DIGEST, noun [Latin, put in order.] Flow represents the natural order for form. The gut mimics this order by digesting input aka separating content; yet adapting to too many wants corrupts it as well; which is why it communicates outwards when receiving unnecessary input.
Justice just-is...do the parasitic few seem like a happy bunch? Who's more enslaved...the many by the few or the few within the many?
And somehow mankind finds itself within the increasing consequences of predatory capitalism.
That's the issue with suggestion...it tempts those consenting to perceive those suggesting as the source to lead them towards wanted outcomes. Whenever ones suggests; one breeds followers; hence ignorance within others.
What if forwards represents a temptation to ignore the only moment ONE can exist within ALL? Avoiding obstacles represents adaptation to balance; not a race towards an end; while jumping over spike pits and ducking explosions.
Until you cultivate a majority pretending to be slaves; while secretly pretending to not be slaves. What does sneaking around within a controlled prison environment matter?
That's why balance represents the ongoing and imbalance the temporary.
Until suggested convenience of using others for supply & demand, which represents ignorance of self sustenance; which will cause imbalance.
Sensing (feels) implies something; nothing implies ignorance of everything and the added but implies acknowledging everything; while ignoring it for suggested nothingness; one word before.