So many words. So many symbols.

Consider this...nature represents the source of sound; while those within represents insane (in sanus aka within sound) person (per sonos aka by sound) aka the responses to perceived sound aka the resound aka resonance.

a) how does one respond to all perceived? By choice based response to balance aka need (resonance) or want (dissonance).

b) what if choice can shape perceived sound into words, which can then be suggested as idolized meaning towards the responding choice of others? What if responding to suggested information (from within form) ignores perceived inspiration (from within spirit; spiro; to breathe aka adaptation as form to flow aka as choice to balance)? What if adaptation to inspiration is needed; while all suggested information tempts one to want vs not want it?

c) notice how the suggested meaning for "insane person" differs from the implied meaning of "in sanus + by sonos"? The former suggests a name; brand; idol for those within form, while the latter represents the attempt to communicate the function of flow. The thing is...flow communicates itself to all form within by simply moving us; which we perceive as inspiration. Responding to perceived inspiration a) grows ones comprehension of all perceived (temporary growth out of ongoing loss) and b) represents the only real communication aka resonance as choice with balance.

What if all suggested information represents spell-craft by the few towards the many? What if flow upon form represents the natural order, and the resulting communication represents the bond of offer/consent aka balance/choice? What if the parasitic few exploit ignorance of the bond by suggesting the inversion thereof aka RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, from religo, to bind anew; re and ligo, to bind.] aka a bond that ignores balance/choice for choice/choice aka submission of free will to suggested -isms by free will of others?

I fear that the excessive longposting is going to cause a debacle. (I don't really).

I learned/taught myself to adapt to inspiration for the sustenance of self; while resisting to suggest information to others. I only write so much because this represents me growing my comprehension by adaptation to perceived (aka the alchemical transmutation out of base ALL into ONEself).

On temporary form and ongoing flow (or, how I learned to stop living and go for a walk)

What you call living represents consenting to behave as others suggest one to do aka participation in society (the beast system designed to domesticate free will of choice by suggestion; while racketeering the self destructive ignorance of those that consent; while using them within a chain of command hierarchy against those who stand in the way). The simplicity in what is suggested represents consent to progression aka going with the flow; while ignoring to resist as temporary form to the ongoing velocity of flow.

Life is not outcome oriented; because flow defines direction (inception towards death) for the form (life) within. Form represents a choice based response to balance (momentum) of flow.

On what basis should one make this distinction?

• DISTINCTION, noun [Latin] - "the act of separating".

As form within flow we each represent differentiated ONEs out of the same ALL. We are already distinct, and each of us now needs to grow self discernment thereof aka who; where and why am I? Another one cannot suggest understanding of self discernment to you; only your choice based response to perceived balance can grow your understanding of what you perceive; hence where you are; hence why you are. I can explain all these to you; that just tempts you to ignore perceived inspiration for suggested information; hence choosing want over need; hence ignoring need for want, which in return causes ONEs lack of understanding of ALL perceived.

The basis you lack represents your lack of understanding the foundation for your existence aka the balance your represent the choice based response to. Before you can choose to want or not want anything anyone suggests to you...before that you respond as choice to balance under natural law by choosing need or want. Considering any suggestion (want or not want) already implies you falling for the temptation to ignore need (perceived inspiration) for want (suggested information).

From another perspective...as form within flow one exists within constant perceivable change; hence only being able to make assumptions within the ever changing moment (um) of motion. What one is missing is the understanding of the only thing that cannot change within constant change...the rules that define how change operates aka the laws of nature aka flow upon form.

Example...as life you cannot perceive your inception and death; because you exist within the momentum (balance) in-between them; yet by adapting to the moving behavior of everyone around; you can grow you understanding of your own position as life in-between inception and death; hence as form within flow; hence as ONE within ALL. This growing of self discernment represents balancing perception (input) and comprehension (response to input) aka communication by resonance to balance (momentum).

Lastly...allow yourself to question "making" aka creation out of nothing. Can you create anything without first responding to everything perceived? Can you shape a "new" thought without utilizing inspiration from everything that already exists?

Suggested creationism (out of nothing) represents the inversion of perceive transmutation (out of everything) aka formed ONEs out of flowing ALL and flow /form out of the ONEness of ALL (energy).

These things called "lives" are themselves just components in a greater structure. It's structures all the way down I think. There's a river also.

Temporary growth potential (form) out of ongoing loss of potentiality (flow). Energy causes internal flow (loss of potentiality); which causes internal balance (momentum); within which temporary growth is formed. Flow (velocity) meeting form (resistance) causes friction; vibration; resonance all the hierarchic form we perceive as the response within it.

The river represents the ongoing that the temporary (choice) within its momentum (balance) can only comprehend by perceiving the consequences of flow upon other form. We cannot perceive flow while existing within its momentum. Only within momentum can we have a free will of choice over directions; while simultaneously being moved by flow from beginning towards end (one direction) aka free-dom..."free" will of choice in response to "dom"inance of balance.

From the alchemy perspective...flow to form (inception); form within flow (life); form to flow (death) aka ONEs transmutation out of base ALL (energy). Then again...this isn't textbook information one can learn from others; but needs to be individually grown as comprehension by adaptation to perceived inspiration aka the allegory of enlightenment; illumination; waking up out of the matrix etc.

I don't mimic continuous motion, I am continuous motion.

Again question creation...can you create new movement or are you responding by choice of form to balance within flow? As form you can only mimic flow; yet as energy you are flow/form aka "ONE for ALL and ALL for ONE" aka "there can be only ONE" aka "islands in the stream; that is what we are; no ONE in between; how could we be wrong"...all sleight of hands for those with eyes to see by our parasitic dipshits.

I am...You are

This is for another level of understanding. As energy ALL is ONE aka the sleight of hand allegory "alone". You represent ONE within ALL; I represents ONE within ALL; each ONE within ALL responses for the sustenance of ONEself within ALL, and ALL (potentiality) self segregates into individual ONEs (potential) to establish self sustenance by internal balance of loss (flow) and growth (form).

ONE perceives differences only because they are needed to communicate inspiration to ONEs sense as to inspire ONEs choice to sustain ONEself within ALL. If everything would be the same; what would inspire ONE within to struggle for self sustenance? It's not I and YOU it's only ever ONE. You are alone aka ALL(in)ONE. The parasitic few suggest choice based agreements for togetherness under the suggested umbrella of unity; while to many ignore the following...U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness".

Everything's always moving, and it's not going to wait up just because somebody hasn't yet put on their walking shoes.

Correct; but your position as temporary form exists within the momentum of ongoing flow. Without momentum (balance); flow couldn't differentiate itself into temporarily growing form; it therefore couldn't establish growth out of loss.

The parasites suggest us to follow flow (to progress; to seek; to hope; to want etc.) They suggest us the inversion (flipping tables allegory) of reality aka seeking order out of chaos (rise of the phoenix allegory); when we represent temporary chaos (form) transmuted out of the natural order (flow). This is why life represents the struggle to grow (choice of need) within the temptation of loss (chocie of want).

Boat leaves in an hour, and it's absolutely impossible to sail down the same river twice. I know; I've tried.

a) counting (hours) implies choice based evaluation of value within balance. Time implies the mimicry of ongoing movement (tick; tick; tick...); which the parasites corrupt by suggesting affixed states (past; present; future). Consenting to those states represents the self inflicted trauma of perceived loss (past); hope/fear (future) and both together cause perceived stress (present).

The trick behind racketeering ignorance of movement is to use suggestion of affixed information which when consented to; is being upheld within ones conscious memory. That's where we are tricked to "capture the moment"; which then tempts us internally (ego) to respond to information based memory (remembering); instead of adapting to perceived inspiration from the ever changing moment(um) of motion.

The conscious memory needs to be used like a ram (temporary storage of information for ongoing adaptation to inspiration); not like a hard-drive (accumulation of suggested information until capacity). The former grows ONEs potential; the latter restricts it.

b) impossibility represents ONEs (growth potential) ignorance of ALL (loss of potentiality). You represent the finite potential being offered access to infinite potentiality to grow out of; which is also why the few require the many to stay ignorant aka to keep restricting the potential willingly by choosing want over need (falling for temptation of ignorance).

c) twice represents counting of ONEs; then suggesting the idolized meaning of two. The parasitic few have this one covered under the suggestion of dualism aka DUAL, adjective [Latin, two.] - "expressing the number two".

Good and bad, up and down, wanting and not wanting, headwaters and deltas - all the same.

Good; bad; want; not want imply conflict. The former represents the suggested rebrand of the latter.

Up and down; headwater and delta imply coexistence of natural opposites within balance.

Want vs not want represents conflict of reason; while up/down represents implication (if/then); hence if one chooses to jump up; then it implies coming from a down and vice versa. Therefore...reason (want); implication (need). The talmud suggests to use implication over reason; while utilizing talmudic reasoning (suggestion of contradictions to both sides within the conflict of reason) to control and perpetuated every conflict from both sides. It represents a farming tool...suggestion (-isms) for division (reason).