Comments (16)
sorted by:
Afks 10 points ago +10 / -0

So, quick question

How do we know what the historical numbers were like

They’ve covered up a ton about our history

Why would I assume the numbers are real

Even if they have never been caught lying before, HOW do we have any idea of world populations thousands of years ago

Zap_Powerz [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

You bring up a good point. Its likely their numbers are inaccurate, but how inaccurate is hard to know. What we do know is there are a fuck ton more people now, orders of magnitude more, than ever before. Humans leave evidence of their existence through their cities, roads, agriculture etc.

free-will-of-choice -5 points ago +1 / -6

How do we know what the historical numbers were like

  • NUM'BER, noun [Probably the radical sense is to speak, name or tell, as our word tell, in the other dialects, is to number number may be allied to name, as the Spaniards use nombre for name, and the French word written with the same letters, is number ] - "the designation of a unit reference to other units".

Question a) does nature communicate numbers or do those within nature suggest numbers to each other? b) As ONE within ALL...what represents the reference to other ONEs? What differentiates ALL reality into each ONE within?

  • HIS'TORY, noun [Latin historia; Gr. knowing] + KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"

...not the suggested his-story by others; but what ONE perceives within ALL.

They’ve covered up a ton about our history

If knowledge represents ALL perceived reality; then the cover up represents ONEs lack of understanding thereof; which can be easily achieved by consenting to suggested his-story.

Why would I assume the numbers are real

As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) can only assume everything; not define anything. for all is constantly changing. How to corrupt ones understanding thereof? By suggesting affixed meaning (words; brands; idols). Nature does not use words to communicate itself; it moves all within to communicate inspiration towards perceiving senses.

even if they have never been caught lying before

What if consenting to a suggested "truth" is what allows those suggesting it to then contradict it as a "lie"? What if true vs lie (conflict of reason) represents want vs not want towards suggested information; while ignoring perceived inspiration?

HOW do we have any idea of world populations thousands of years ago

Question if you represent ONE within ALL; then question if everyone represents ONE (form) within ALL (flow); then question if ALL (flow/form) represents ONE in energy aka EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power".

BuckeyePatr1ot 6 points ago +6 / -0

Very Malthusian of you.

nc777 3 points ago +3 / -0

So that's where that half billion number comes from

radx4 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ding, ding, ding. Winner! Wait until you see what things look like when less fossil fuels are available and crop yields drop by 80-90%.

Zap_Powerz [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

I did not have to be this way. If we never implemented system to feed and care for people that cannot feed and care for themselves then we would not be here in this mess.

some_crypto_guy 2 points ago +2 / -0

This problem was completely unnecessary. It was created by governments financing large families for parents that couldn't support large families.

Now our "solution" is going to be a system where millions starve randomly when the weather is too cold or hot?

Simple solutions like tax incentives for having fewer (or no) children work just fine in first world countries.

Encouraging the third world to immigrate to the first world is the biggest problem, yet our banking family friends continue to push for this through their puppet leaders that we "vote" for.

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
pkvi 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its been my position that my only concern with depopulation is not having been informed. If Klaus had come to me, said, listen, they gotta go, ayh would have said, ayh know how to drive a bulldozer.

Since they didn't include me --> now its us vs them vs (them)

More precisely its us vs (them) with human shields in between like a really bad miniature golf course.. ~(o.o)~

Zap_Powerz [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0


I wish they would have never of wasted all those resources in the first place that allowed the retards to reproduce in such huge numbers. We should have never even gotten here. There should have never been a need to cull. Let nature do what nature does and everything would have been fine.

But no, we just had to reward the dysgenic, diseased, disabled and degenerate and punish the hygienic, healthy, able bodied, disciplined, resourceful and productive.

Well nature is about to reassert herself with a fucking holy vengeance.

BloodShallReign 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nope, it's that elves want all the toys for themselves.

Love_Over_Fear 0 points ago +1 / -1

Is that another climate change / depopulation propaganda?

free-will-of-choice -1 points ago +1 / -2

a) count to six million or until you question consenting to any suggested numbers...especially as ONE within ALL.

b) HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form] + RACE, noun [Latin radix; radius; ray, radiate, etc.] What if the radius of form (life) represents the momentum of flow (inception towards death), and radiating form outwards within flow represents sustenance of self (blood); shared among others (bloodline)?

c) what if agree vs disagree represents the conflict of reason (want vs not want) caused by consenting to a suggestion (numbers)? Why consent by choice to a suggested conflict by the choice of others; when choice represents the response to balance?

d) SITUA'TION, noun - "position; location in respect to something else". What has more value...being choice (free will) within balance (need/want) or choice vs choice (want vs not want)?

What if choice represents evaluation in response to the only value of balance? What if there can't be a higher value than evaluation?

e) what are the ramifications for the few if the many (how many is irrelevant) are culled? Does the few controlling the many dynamic change at all?

wowdudeokay 0 points ago +2 / -2

Shut up, aspie. Your posts suck every single time.

free-will-of-choice -1 points ago +1 / -2

Your posts suck every single time.

Doesn't "every single time" imply your consent to that which you evaluate as "sucking"?


Look underneath the Asberger story and you can find an internationalist; anti-human parasite called chaskel leib kanner; suggesting and mass propagating the autism belief system.