Same thing could be said about science, only difference is that there exist no evidence that their scientific theories are true, it is all faith based. People saw it on TV, so they assumed it must be true.
Big bang is nothing more then a theory. No proof exist that Einsteins theories holds up, in fact all you are going to find is that he has been disproved, e=mc2 does not even work. 300 years later we still have no proof that Newtons theory of gravity holds up, people were able to explain why things fall even before Newton, any idea that two objects attracts each other is just false. NASA, the Moon landing, ISS and Mars rovers, all fake, can not be confirmed by anyone outside of the governments Freemasons.
If flow (inception towards death); then form (life). If balance; then choice. Implication (if/then) represents balance; reason (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs bad; believing vs not believing etc.) represents imbalance caused by ignorance of balance.
If question for choice (want vs not want); then balance (need/want) came before and want over need (ignorance) was chosen.
Same thing could be said about science, only difference is that there exist no evidence that their scientific theories are true, it is all faith based. People saw it on TV, so they assumed it must be true.
Big bang is nothing more then a theory. No proof exist that Einsteins theories holds up, in fact all you are going to find is that he has been disproved, e=mc2 does not even work. 300 years later we still have no proof that Newtons theory of gravity holds up, people were able to explain why things fall even before Newton, any idea that two objects attracts each other is just false. NASA, the Moon landing, ISS and Mars rovers, all fake, can not be confirmed by anyone outside of the governments Freemasons.
SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] + KNOW, verb transitive [Latin nosco, cognosco.] - "to perceive".
What if consent to suggested scientism corrupts understanding of perceived knowledge?
I do not answer what if questions.
If flow (inception towards death); then form (life). If balance; then choice. Implication (if/then) represents balance; reason (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs bad; believing vs not believing etc.) represents imbalance caused by ignorance of balance.
If question for choice (want vs not want); then balance (need/want) came before and want over need (ignorance) was chosen.
Want is from "to want" (not want); true is from "true" (false); good is from "good" (bad); and balance is from "balance" (imbalance).
To balance:
need/want (if/then) = need (balance) over want (imbalance)
good/bad (if/then) = good (balance) over bad (imbalance)
Truth/false (if/then) = truth (balance) over false (imbalance)
Balance (need/want/good/true/false) is the reason