I saw a video on YT that was pulled down within a few days. It was like a nutritionist or chiropractor, or maybe a sports doctor, going over one of his patients' bloodwork. He said the tests that they ran were the same tests you would order for an AIDS patient. He was rapidly losing CD4 cells within a few months after the jab.
The researchers used data from the UK surveillance report and analyzed it over time. This lead to the UK censoring the surveillance report. It’s the same data source axo keeps posting on. No idea where they got individual protein marker numbers. I agree that deserves dd
I think you are talking about the Technical Reports. They are long and numerous! I have looked at one set of data already upon which this claim has been based in the past and it turned out to be a research mistake that made a prediction far in the future.
I'm not blaming you for being unable to give supporting data for this, because I can't either. I just won't accept it as true until those people can actually show me how they came to the conclusion that people have AIDS-like symptoms. You can't just tell people to look at the science themselves. You need to cite actual documents and page numbers. If they can't even present their findings in a way that would satisfy a high school research paper, I'm not going to spend hours researching it.
Re debate.. maybe you can get in touch w Kevin McCairn. He has a YT where he does livestreams but he deletes them immediately afterwards to avoid the strikes. He is not PC.
He is pals w Dr. Richard Flemming. They are both on Twitter.
Kevin has a neuroscience background & does good breakdowns on the C19 studies of the day.
He is not American but he calls out the wokeling bullshit & race propaganda & corruption in Academia. He has a dedicated audience of "Raccoons."
He is kind of an acquired taste but he grows on you, as does the live chat.
He wouldn't be debating you per se, just having a good conversation. He knows a lot about prions, if that interests you. He has also looked at some vials under the microscope.
Re: prions- the spikes are toxic proteins and they are capable of causing damage to DNA. Even if they are not technically prions they may have ostensibly similar capabilities and side effects. Thus the distinction between a toxic protein and a prion may have little practical importance. Treating them with similar techniques such as through the use of antioxidants seems to be helpful.
What’s your problem? I’ve given you evidence and a method. That’s better most of what gets posted. You’re welcome to post your own efforts. Don’t expect someone ever to do the work for you.
Testable hypotheses in terms of timeline *
Yeah good point. AIDs-like depletion is better description. Even do this appears to be explanatory of:
I saw a video on YT that was pulled down within a few days. It was like a nutritionist or chiropractor, or maybe a sports doctor, going over one of his patients' bloodwork. He said the tests that they ran were the same tests you would order for an AIDS patient. He was rapidly losing CD4 cells within a few months after the jab.
Wish I could find the video again.
I would like to check out this person's channel. Do you have a link to the source?
This video does not sufficiently show how the shots impair the immune system.
The researchers used data from the UK surveillance report and analyzed it over time. This lead to the UK censoring the surveillance report. It’s the same data source axo keeps posting on. No idea where they got individual protein marker numbers. I agree that deserves dd
This seems flawed to me. We need to see the data to make sure they are not extrapolating into the future, which I have seen happen before.
Go for it it’s the UK official tallies. Look at the report values over time to reproduce
I think you are talking about the Technical Reports. They are long and numerous! I have looked at one set of data already upon which this claim has been based in the past and it turned out to be a research mistake that made a prediction far in the future.
I'm not blaming you for being unable to give supporting data for this, because I can't either. I just won't accept it as true until those people can actually show me how they came to the conclusion that people have AIDS-like symptoms. You can't just tell people to look at the science themselves. You need to cite actual documents and page numbers. If they can't even present their findings in a way that would satisfy a high school research paper, I'm not going to spend hours researching it.
Is this your video or a repost from someone else?
Re debate.. maybe you can get in touch w Kevin McCairn. He has a YT where he does livestreams but he deletes them immediately afterwards to avoid the strikes. He is not PC.
He is pals w Dr. Richard Flemming. They are both on Twitter.
Kevin has a neuroscience background & does good breakdowns on the C19 studies of the day.
He is not American but he calls out the wokeling bullshit & race propaganda & corruption in Academia. He has a dedicated audience of "Raccoons."
He is kind of an acquired taste but he grows on you, as does the live chat.
He wouldn't be debating you per se, just having a good conversation. He knows a lot about prions, if that interests you. He has also looked at some vials under the microscope.
R u on YT?
Not mine.
Re: prions- the spikes are toxic proteins and they are capable of causing damage to DNA. Even if they are not technically prions they may have ostensibly similar capabilities and side effects. Thus the distinction between a toxic protein and a prion may have little practical importance. Treating them with similar techniques such as through the use of antioxidants seems to be helpful.
This is incorrect. If one loses 5% of something every week you never go to zero.
Starting at 100% we would have 95% then 90.25% then 85.74% then 81.5% then 77.38% etc...
After 26 weeks (1/2 a year) one would still have 28% of their immune system.
After a year, one would still have 7.5% of their immune system.
A slight change from 5% loss to 2.5% loss would be 53% immune system after 6 months and still nearly 30% after a year.
We can do the math and figure out the rate. From 750 to 250 in 26 weeks. So (250÷750)^(1÷26)=~4.2% weekly decline.
Even so the question is what is the critical immune level past which every day illnesses become critical?
If it is a testable hypothesis, please post the data here.
I said it’s possible never said I’d do the work lol but if i see a follow up I’ll repost
So you blindly post bullshit because it fits your agenda? Or why exactly?
What’s your problem? I’ve given you evidence and a method. That’s better most of what gets posted. You’re welcome to post your own efforts. Don’t expect someone ever to do the work for you.
you have posted a youtube video.
do you even hnderstand what evidence means?
Try harder troll