I think you are talking about the Technical Reports. They are long and numerous! I have looked at one set of data already upon which this claim has been based in the past and it turned out to be a research mistake that made a prediction far in the future.
I'm not blaming you for being unable to give supporting data for this, because I can't either. I just won't accept it as true until those people can actually show me how they came to the conclusion that people have AIDS-like symptoms. You can't just tell people to look at the science themselves. You need to cite actual documents and page numbers. If they can't even present their findings in a way that would satisfy a high school research paper, I'm not going to spend hours researching it.
This seems flawed to me. We need to see the data to make sure they are not extrapolating into the future, which I have seen happen before.
Go for it it’s the UK official tallies. Look at the report values over time to reproduce
I think you are talking about the Technical Reports. They are long and numerous! I have looked at one set of data already upon which this claim has been based in the past and it turned out to be a research mistake that made a prediction far in the future.
I'm not blaming you for being unable to give supporting data for this, because I can't either. I just won't accept it as true until those people can actually show me how they came to the conclusion that people have AIDS-like symptoms. You can't just tell people to look at the science themselves. You need to cite actual documents and page numbers. If they can't even present their findings in a way that would satisfy a high school research paper, I'm not going to spend hours researching it.