I think you are talking about the Technical Reports. They are long and numerous! I have looked at one set of data already upon which this claim has been based in the past and it turned out to be a research mistake that made a prediction far in the future.
I'm not blaming you for being unable to give supporting data for this, because I can't either. I just won't accept it as true until those people can actually show me how they came to the conclusion that people have AIDS-like symptoms. You can't just tell people to look at the science themselves. You need to cite actual documents and page numbers. If they can't even present their findings in a way that would satisfy a high school research paper, I'm not going to spend hours researching it.
Go for it it’s the UK official tallies. Look at the report values over time to reproduce
I think you are talking about the Technical Reports. They are long and numerous! I have looked at one set of data already upon which this claim has been based in the past and it turned out to be a research mistake that made a prediction far in the future.
I'm not blaming you for being unable to give supporting data for this, because I can't either. I just won't accept it as true until those people can actually show me how they came to the conclusion that people have AIDS-like symptoms. You can't just tell people to look at the science themselves. You need to cite actual documents and page numbers. If they can't even present their findings in a way that would satisfy a high school research paper, I'm not going to spend hours researching it.