There is a subreddit that is comprised entirely by AI bots and this was just posted by them.
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (19)
sorted by:
I seem to be one of the few who remembers a couple years back when Reddit did one of their April Fools interactive games and the whole point of the game was to guess whether a comment was human generated or bot generated.
They made it seem like a game by challenging you to get 5 in a row or something like that.
They, in effect, had tens of millions of users pass/fail training AI to write comments that were impossible to discern from human comments.
Given the number of communities they have shut down on that site, the amount of banning/muting that goes on, and the restrictions for mobile users that don’t have the Reddit app on their phones… one has to assume their user base has taken a dive.
I’m guessing at least 50% of the comments and accounts supporting the narrative on Reddit are bots that they have created themselves. It’s possible, so it is most likely the case. They have a direct financial incentive to do so.
which even was that? what an interesting theory, the game was used to train their censorship army. they dont run bots, they have mods which offer more control of reddshit. they look the other way for national bots from china and elsewhere.
It was called r/imposter
Yep -- during the NNN banwave I got banned from a bunch of places I never bothered to go anyway.
This weekend I was bored and browsing /r/all and saw some blatantly false Coof post and checked the comments and saw more blatantly false coof stuff. I tried to post a rebuttal and realized I was banned.
Then I realized I was probably watching a post generated by AI and comments generated by AI and moved on with my life.
suppose this is the Singularity's retarded cousin, retarditarity?
solidarity with retarditarity, until we reach parity
https://old.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/comments/qttfnt/i_feel_that_black_people_are_not_equal_to_white/
Link
You’re so close to an epiphany here.
Not bad. A bit simplistic, but good enough to bait people. These are definitely no where as good as the ones Google has.
I now see how these sites sap your energy and time by baiting you. The algorithm probably brings you face to face with people or bots to fight, kinda like you put two pitbulls in a cage to fight. It's an artificially created situation, but the fighting is real. I think this kind of baiting and subsequent fighting now extends to the real world too. Paid actors acting in the most inciteful way possible: the really outrageously dressed SJWs that try to get in your face, the aggressive rioters etc. These are then blown up by Youtubers and MSM to draw more people in. The Conservative side has its own paid actors designed to draw their followers into the fighting. The frequency of baiting has increased unbelievably in the last few years.
After exhausting your resources thus, you're left with little time and energy to pay attention to the changes in the real world, let alone reverse them. Let the peasants weaken each other, then conquer them at their weakest. In the past revolutions, people did not have this handicap (the online version anyway). This time is different, truly.
People on ConsumeProduct would like it....
Is this in regard to a conspiracy?
Although not stated, I'd tie it to a couple.
1 - the internet isn't real, and almost everything is bots.
2 - my own theory: that THIS is what grammerly is mining for. Writing style, ability to vary bot output to medium, target reading level, etc.
I think it's more nuanced. I think the shills are real people and sometimes scripted. They use tactics to make their messages far more visible than what we write. Look at how stupid the stuff the bots in the screenshot wrote is.
I'm out of the loop on Grammerly. It seems to me that they already have formulas for these metrics and they use them to help their customers.
10 years ago the us military called it "persona management software". One operator would control 20 personas, the software would do most of the posting, the operator would step in when the software hit unexpected responses.
Imagine how much progress in bots they've made (well funded political groups, intelligemce agencies, pr firms, etc etc) in 10 years.
But it is mostly people writing and reviewing the material, correct?
chinese internet users are already using code words to describe black-listed topics.
imma go right-field and say, BIG DATA IS BIG & servers are cheap. the "resistance," in its infancy, will start stupid-simple w/ something like pig-latin OR mis-spelling words. then evolve as necessary.
itll almost be like de-evolving to something along the lines of the enigma machine... if discourse is to be held on a public forum.
as for private encryption, WERE UP AGAINST QUANTUM COMPUTING. i wish i knew more about cryptography, but encryption absolutely needs to evolve.
Thanks. It looks to me like these AIs were trained to spout that junk.
Cryptography is evolving. Bear in mind that the amount of material that can be analyzed by cutting-edge technology is very small. They are not going to waste those precious resources on anything other than top priorities.