No, it is functional. If you want to deceive your enemies, you can't have regular people actually know what's going on. They lie for specific reasons. Those aren't the actual conclusions.
why leak the “what’s actually going on” part then? wouldn’t a functional intelligence community be able to, idk, not blurt out it’s secrets verbatim on national television in a very calculated fashion? lol
Because we aren't talking about how Wuhan was in fact the source of the virus are we? We are criticising the intelligence community as a whole and it will blow over.
They changed the conversation. Classic Intelligence misdirection.
No, it is functional. If you want to deceive your enemies, you can't have regular people actually know what's going on. They lie for specific reasons. Those aren't the actual conclusions.
why leak the “what’s actually going on” part then? wouldn’t a functional intelligence community be able to, idk, not blurt out it’s secrets verbatim on national television in a very calculated fashion? lol
Because we aren't talking about how Wuhan was in fact the source of the virus are we? We are criticising the intelligence community as a whole and it will blow over.
They changed the conversation. Classic Intelligence misdirection.
It is calculated, but I don't see any "blurting out" of anything. The issue is far to complex to play the "But then why would they..." game.